General Performance and Encoding

General Usage Performance

Content Creation Performance

MPEG-4 Encoding Performance - 'Sum of All Fears' Ch. 9

General Performance

As pointed out in recent reviews of Athlon 64 motherboards, the presence of the memory controller on the Athlon 64 chip has really tightened the range of performance that we see in benchmark tests. Stock performance in Winstones, PCMark04, and Auto GK encoding do not reveal a consistent leader in the benchmarks. It is still noteworthy that the Epox consistently appears at or near the top in all the General Performance and Encoding Benchmarks.

As we would expect, the Biostar performs the same in encoding whether running the PCIe or XGP graphics. This is confirmation that video has little impact on encoding results as we would expect. However, it is impossible to miss how very poorly the Biostar XGP performs in PCMark2004. Clearly, this is not a slot that is equal in performance to AGP 8X.

Standard Performance Test Configuration Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

75 Comments

View All Comments

  • vijay333 - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

    oh...final system will have 4-5 HDs, standard DVD reader/writer along with (most likely) a 6800Ultra or a X800XL...
  • Xenoterranos - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

    Anandtech did toy with a listening test a while back (I really don't remember much about it, other than the fact that they should have used Klipsch proMedia Ultra 5.1 speakers...)
  • vijay333 - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

    Maybe I missed this info in the article somehow, but could you provide the minimum/recommended PSU wattages for the motherboards? esp the DFI and the Epox. I have a Antec 400W Smartpower PSU right now, but read a few posts on newegg that this might not be enough? Hope I don't need to upgrade this too along with the mobo, cpu and gpu...
  • vijay333 - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

  • knitecrow - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

    I have a comment about audio -- a topic that most sites ignore.

    Shouldn't there be a blind listening test?


    i mean cpu utilization is fairly useless. If i am listening to mp3s i care more about the quality than cpu utilization.
  • flatblastard - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

    I stopped reading on page 4 upon discovering the round-up. No explanation needed...
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - link

    g33k -
    The DFI was more a control to demonstrate SLI and Ultra performance were the same other than SLI video. Drivers have updated and we retested everything on the DFI as a sanity check. We ran benchmarks and not a full review, but it was hard to ignore the excellent performance.

    There is also a comment in our Final Words that the MSI Ultra board should also be considered a winner, since the SLI version was a Gold Editors Choice in the SLI roundup, and the Ultra should perform the same.
  • g33k - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link

    Along the same logic though, I'm curious as to why you chose to review the DFI Ultra-D when you reviewed the SLI version of this board earlier as well?.
  • g33k - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link

    Jeez, read Wesley's comments, he just answered why he did not review, the MSI board. It was already reviewed in the SLI roundup.

  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - link

    "As you can see, none of the onboard audio solutions were quite as low in CPU utilization as the Creative SoundBlaster Live! Chip, which is used on the MSI K8N Neo4 SLI Platinum tested in the nForce4 SLI roundup."

    Since this is still nF4 we included components tested on all nForce4 boards. The Ultra version of the MSI, BTW, uses the Realtek ALC850 chipset and not the Sound Blaster Live!. The SB Live! is only used on the MSI SLI.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now