Announcement Four: AVX-512 & Favored Core

To complete the set, there are a couple of other points worth discussing. First up is that AVX-512 support coming to Skylake-X. Intel has implemented AVX-512 (or at least a variant of it) in the last generation of Xeon Phi processors, Knights Landing, but this will be the first implementation in a consumer/enterprise core.

Intel hasn’t given many details on AVX-512 yet, regarding whether there is one or two units per CPU, or if it is more granular and is per core. We expect it to be enabled on day one, although I have a suspicion there may be a BIOS flag that needs enabling in order to use it.

As with AVX and AVX2, the goal here is so provide a powerful set of hardware to solve vector calculations. The silicon that does this is dense, so sustained calculations run hot: we’ve seen processors that support AVX and AVX2 offer decreased operating frequencies when these instructions come along, and AVX-512 will be no different. Intel has not clarified at what frequency the AVX-512 instructions will run at, although if each core can support AVX-512 we suspect that the reduced frequency will only effect that core.

With the support of AVX-512, Intel is calling the Core i9-7980X ‘the first TeraFLOP CPU’. I’ve asked details as to how this figure is calculated (software, or theoretical), but it does make a milestone in processor design. We are muddying the waters a bit here though: an AVX unit does vector calculations, as does a GPU. We’re talking about parallel compute processes completed by dedicated hardware – the line between general purpose CPU and anything else is getting blurred.

Favored Core

For Broadwell-E, the last generation of Intel’s HEDT platform, we were introduced to the term ‘Favored Core’, which was given the title of Turbo Boost Max 3.0. The idea here is that each piece of silicon that comes off of the production line is different (which is then binned to match to a SKU), but within a piece of silicon the cores themselves will have different frequency and voltage characteristics. The one core that is determined to be the best is called the ‘Favored Core’, and when Intel’s Windows 10 driver and software were in place, single threaded workloads were moved to this favored core to run faster.

In theory, it was good – a step above the generic Turbo Boost 2.0 and offered an extra 100-200 MHz for single threaded applications. In practice, it was flawed: motherboard manufacturers didn’t support it, or they had it disabled in the BIOS by default. Users had to install the drivers and software as well – without the combination of all of these at work, the favored core feature didn’t work at all.

Intel is changing the feature for Skylake-X, with an upgrade and for ease-of-use. The driver and software are now part of Windows updates, so users will get them automatically (if you don’t want it, you have to disable it manually). With Skylake-X, instead of one core being the favored core, there are two cores in this family. As a result, two apps can be run at the higher frequency, or one app that needs two cores can participate.

Availability

Last but not least, let's talk about availability. Intel will likely announce availability during the keynote at Computex, which is going on at the same time as this news post goes live. The launch date should be sooner rather than later for the LCC parts, although the HCC parts are unknown. But no matter what, I think it's safe to say that by the end of this summer, we should expect a showdown over the best HEDT processor around.

Announcement Three: Skylake-X's New L3 Cache Architecture
Comments Locked

203 Comments

View All Comments

  • LuckyWhale - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    It's so unconsciously idiotic for tech articles to quote price of products as $1999. What the hell are you doing? Hello?!!! You are not Intel's marketing department.
  • catavalon21 - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    Idiotic? Hardly. I don't believe Ian was encouraging buying these, but he is providing insight on something ... unexpected? We (this community) have long criticized Intel's lack of much interesting for a long time. This is interesting. It may not be useful to many of us, but it's very interesting.

    Complaining about a $2000 processor with these specs? Highest end Intel enthusiast processors have often been expensive. Several enthusiast Extreme processors from a decade ago weighed in anywhere from $1000 and up at the time, with performance that blew chunks compared to this beast. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yorkfield_(microproc...

    If you think $1999 is too expensive for AT to preview, I wonder what you thought about the $5000 Dell monitor covered a while back. http://www.anandtech.com/show/11220/dells-32-inch-...
  • catavalon21 - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    If I could only copy and paste working links, then we'd have something.
  • wrkingclass_hero - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    Why is this announcement being reported on, but Threadripper never was? I even did a double check on this site and searched Threadripper and this is the only article that popped up.
  • catavalon21 - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    That's a big Twinkie.
  • Maleorderbride - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    Because AMD was literally on stage when you posted that. The article is up now.
  • ThreeDee912 - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    Uhm... I guess you need better searching skills.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/11482/amd-cpu-update...
  • Meteor2 - Saturday, June 3, 2017 - link

    Threadripper was announced weeks ago, at the AMD Financial Analysts' day. And indeed Anandtech did not report it. https://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2017/05/amd-ryze...

    It's hard to conclude anything other than that Purch has received/will receive a payment from Intel in return for only reporting Intel stories for a period.
  • BillR - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    I wouldn't get too excited, Amdahl's Law is asserting itself and you get diminishing returns by adding CPUs. It all comes down to the apps and how well and how many CPUs they can use effectively.
  • boozed - Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - link

    Was hoping for some more powerful LGA1151 CPUs

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now