Synthetics

As always we’ll also take a quick look at synthetic performance. As a pretty straightforward and wider implementation of Pascal, GTX 1080 Ti shouldn't offer too many surprises here.

Synthetic: TessMark, Image Set 4, 64x Tessellation

With TessMark, we find that the that the GTX 1080 Ti offers 26% better tessellation performance than the GTX 1080, and 63% better performance than the GTX 980 Ti. NVIDIA has always built their architectures geometry-heavy, and GTX 1080 Ti further adds to that lead.

Finally, for looking at texel and pixel fillrate, we have the Beyond3D Test Suite. This test offers a slew of additional tests – many of which use behind the scenes or in our earlier architectural analysis – but for now we’ll stick to simple pixel and texel fillrates.

Synthetic: Beyond 3D Suite - Pixel Fillrate

Synthetic: Beyond 3D Suite - Texel Fillrate

As it turns out, the pixel fillrate results for the GTX 1080 Ti are a bit surprising. The GTX 1080 Ti doesn’t dominate by as much as I would have expected given the massive memory bandwidth advantage and additional ROP throughput. Not that a 25% increase over the GTX 1080 is anything to sneeze at, but I wonder if we’re looking at one of the consequences of the unusual way NVIDIA has cut-down GP102 for GTX 1080 Ti. We haven’t seen NVIDIA disable a single ROP/memory channel at the high-end before in this manner.

As for texel fillrate, the GTX 1080 Ti excels. In fact it does a bit better than I’d otherwise expect based on the specifications. This could be a sign that GTX 1080 is a bit bandwidth limited at times when it comes to texel throughput, as that’s the facet of performance the GTX 1080 Ti has improved upon the most.

Compute Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

161 Comments

View All Comments

  • webdoctors - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    No, its because the dollar is worthless and real inflation is off the charts. Once we make the dollar great again, we'll see prices come down.
  • eddman - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    The only reason that we had $500 cards is because of the fierce competition from ATI back then.

    Whenever ATI's cards couldn't compete, or could but were not launched yet, nvidia jacked the prices up. I don't know why people forget the $600 8800 GTX or $650 GTX 280. Take a look at the link I posted above.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    What I miss is being able to buy a couple of well-priced mid-range cards that beat the high-end, with good scaling. I couldn't afford the 580 when it was new, but 2x 460 SLI was faster and served nicely for a good while. With support & optimisations moving away from SLI/CF though (lesser gains, more stuttering, costly connectors, unlock codes, etc.), a single good GPU is more attractive, but the cost way up the scale compared to 5 years ago.

    Have a look at the Anand review for the 280 though, it shows what I mean: 2x 8800GT SLI was faster than the 280, but $200 cheaper and with excellent scaling. I had 2x 8800GT 1GB before switching to the two 460s. Today, mid-range cards don't even support SLI (GTX 1060).

    Ian.
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - link

    What about two RX480s? Can they top a 1080?
  • aryonoco - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    The 780 Ti was released in November 2013.

    The 1080 Ti is being released now, in March 2017.

    So 3.5 years later, Nvidia's flagship consumer card has improved 260% while using pretty much the same amount of power and generating pretty much the same level of noise.

    If this continues, I can see that in the next few years, all sort of software will find a way to utilise the GPU more, not just games and neural networks.

    Nvidia has a lot to be proud of. Their execution in the past few years has been Apple-esque.
  • Meteor2 - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    Reflected in their share price!
  • virtuastro - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    @Ryan Smith

    Can you test Intel i7 7700K, Intel-E Processors, and Ryzen 7 1800x with a GTX 1080ti in benchmark? :)
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Unfortunately no. We don't have a central office; I'm in the US with the GPUs, and Ian is in the UK with the CPUs. He's working on game testing for Ryzen Part 2, but we likely won't be able to include the GTX 1080 Ti.
  • virtuastro - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Aw dang. Thanks for answer anyway. :D
  • Meteor2 - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    FedEx?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now