Total War: Attila

The Total War franchise moves on to Attila, another The Creative Assembly development, and is a stand-alone strategy title set in 395AD where the main story line lets the gamer take control of the leader of the Huns in order to conquer parts of the world. Graphically the game can render hundreds/thousands of units on screen at once, all with their individual actions and can put some of the big cards to task.

For low end graphics, we test at 720p with performance settings, recording the average frame rate. With mid and high range graphics, we test at 1080p with the quality setting. In both circumstances, unlimited video memory is enabled and the in-game scripted benchmark is used.

Total War: Attila on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Total War: Attila on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Total War: Attila on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)

Total War: Attila on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)

Total War: Attila on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)

Total War: Attila on Integrated Graphics

Similar to Alien Isolation, the only discrete GPU there seems to be much of a difference between the i3 and i7 is on the R9 285, where the newer microarchitecture has the advantage. The integrated graphics in Sandy Bridge were laughable, and the Core i3 offers over double the performance here.

Gaming: Alien Isolation Gaming: Grand Theft Auto V
Comments Locked

186 Comments

View All Comments

  • silverblue - Saturday, February 4, 2017 - link

    It's a bit weird, but most of them are within margin of error.
  • WoodyBL - Saturday, February 4, 2017 - link

    Am I the only one noticing that the i5-4690 was beating the i5-7600k in a lot of benchmarks? I'm having a hard time processing how that was even possible...
  • fanofanand - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    Wasn't the 4690 Devil's Canyon? Similar IPC higher clocks I would assume. Most of the changes lately have been hardware decoders/encoders and I/o changes. Intel takes baby steps because it can, hopefully that changes with Ryzen.
  • WoodyBL - Saturday, February 4, 2017 - link

    Am I the only one noticing that the i5-4690 was beating the i5-7600k in a lot of benchmarks? I'm having a hard time processing how that was even possible...
  • yankeeDDL - Saturday, February 4, 2017 - link

    Glad to see that my 2 years old A10 still trashes anything Intel on integrated graphics.
  • Gothmoth - Saturday, February 4, 2017 - link

    no wonder intel is not selling to consumers, complaining about stagnation.
    the money they make comes from enterprise i guess.

    i have not updated my sandy bridge for 6 years.

    and i will not until intel gives me a reason.. this is only babysteps.
    i had to cash out 1200 euro for a new mobo, cpu, ram, cooler... and for what.... 30% more performance..... meh
  • TelstarTOS - Saturday, February 4, 2017 - link

    "Responsiveness? Top class."

    No way. It will suck in heavy multitasking.
  • synth0 - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    This is how good a 2011 chip really is!
    This shows there really isn't much sense to upgrade a PC anymore, and with time it will get even less sense to invest money for an upgrade. What will be in 2024? Are we entering into a stalemate in the PC area?
  • lopri - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    An excellent review but I would rather get a 7600K. Oh, wait. I already have something similar: 2600K.
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    "The Intel Core i3-7350K (60W) Review: Almost a Core i7-2600K"
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    .....and not even CLOSE to a Sandy Bridge!

    Can the Intel Core i3-7350K use my Optical port in DRM crippled Windows 10 for Audio Production?

    Show me how!

    Can I record what I hear on the desktop with the DRM crippling API's found in Windows Vista / 7 / 8 and 10 ?

    Show me how!

    Will it boot "directly" to Windows XP faster than I can on my 35 watt dualcore Sandy Bridge (3-seconds on a Samsung 850 Pro SSD) so I CAN use my optical ports and record whatever I want without a DRM crippled Spyware Platform, or do the new motherboards prevent me from booting to a NON-crippled O.S. like my copy of Windows XP?

    Well?

    Should I "upgrade" to a crippled platform that prevents me from doing ANYTHING I want to do, but allows me to do only what Microsoft graciously allows me to do?

    ........ and explain to me again why I should pay more for my own enslavement?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now