Meet the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 OC

As the otherwise reference GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition is only available directly though NVIDIA, for our GTX 1060 review I also reached out to ASUS to take a look at a retail card. What they sent over was nothing less than what’s the most feature packed and overall premium of the GTX 1060 cards.

ASUS has made a name for themselves with their Republic of Gamers lineup of hardware, with a focus on premium construction and features, and their STRIX GTX 1060 OC certainly lives up to this reputation. Along with the ubiquitous factory overclock, the card features a sizable triple fan open air cooler, a custom PCB, RGB lighting, and even a pair of 4-pin fan headers for full size chassis fans. In short, ASUS threw in everything for their highest-end GTX 1060 and then some. The tradeoff? It’s also the most expensive of the GTX 1060s, retailing at around $314.

GeForce GTX 1060 Cards
  NVIDIA GTX 1060 Founders Ed. ASUS STRIX GTX 1060 OC
Base Clock 1506MHz 1620MHz
Boost Clock 1709MHz 1848MHz
Memory Clock 8Gbps GDDR5 8.2Gbps GDDR5
VRAM 6GB 6GB
Length 9.75" 11.75"
Width Double Slot Double Slot
Cooler Type Blower Open Air
Price $299 $314

The specific SKU we’re looking at, the STRIX GTX 1060 OC, ships with a moderate factory overclock. Out of the box the GPU base clock is 1620MHz and the boost clock 1847MHz, 114MHz and 138MHz respectively over the GTX 1060 reference clocks. This amounts to an 8% GPU overclock. Meanwhile the memory also features a much smaller factory overclock, shipping at 8.2Gbps, 200Mbps (3%) over reference.

In terms of construction, the STRIX GTX 1060 teeters on being overbuilt. ASUS has taken advantage of the pin compatibility between the GP104 and GP106, reusing the fundamental board and cooler design from their STRIX GTX 1080/1070 cards and simply replacing the GPU with GP106. The end result is that this is a board and cooler setup designed to feed and cool a 180W+ video card, but now attached to the 120W GTX 1060.

At 11.75” in length, the card’s large size allows ASUS to outfit the card with a full, high end cooling setup. Providing airflow is a trio of the company’s 90mm “wing-blade” fans. Like many other ASUS cards in the last year, these fans support zero fan speed idle (or as ASUS calls it, 0dB fans), so they only spin to begin with once the card gets up to a temperature that requires active cooling. And as we’ll see in our noise testing, with 3 such fans they definitely don’t have to spin up very far.

Meanwhile heat transfer is provided by one of ASUS’s DirectCU III heatsinks, which runs virtually the entire length of the card. ASUS runs 5 heatpipes between the GPU baseplate and the rest of the heatsink; 4 going towards the rear, and the final looping around the front. The sheer size of the heatsink for a 120W card means that STRIX GTX 1060 can soak up a significant amount of heat before switching to active cooling, both keeping temperatures down and allowing the card to stay in zero fan speed idle mode for longer.

Moving on, since the PCB itself is carried over from the higher-end GTX 1000 series parts, so is the power delivery system. ASUS implements a 6+1 phase delivery system on the STRIX GTX 1060, utilizing their own Super Alloy Power branded components (yes, that’s the ROG logo on the chokes). Though impressive in its own right, this is the one area where I suspect that the card’s overbuilt design really is going to waste; NVIDIA’s strict TDP limits and locked-down overvoltage controls means that short of modifying the card, the power delivery system isn’t running anywhere near its limit, even with overclocking.

Speaking of which, powering the card requires an 8-pin PCIe power connector. ASUS has placed a reverse connector near the top of the card, along with their traditional LED status light to indicate whether there’s a working connection or not. The placement of this connector is my only real complaint about the card; the connector sits lower than the heatsink, and while the reversed connector makes it much easier to work with, it’s still hardware to work with since it’s buried below the heatsink. I have a pretty good idea why ASUS did it this way – so that the external power cable won’t stick up even higher on an already taller than normal card – but it means that you’ll be glad the LED status light is there if you’re plugging in a 6+2-pin power cable.

At the other end of the spectrum, the STRIX GTX 1060 doesn’t just draw power, but it supplies it as well. Found at the far side of the card is a pair of 4-pin fan headers, installed specifically for letting the video card power and control full size chassis fans. This is the first time a card with this feature has crossed my desk, and while it’s admittedly a bit unusual since the card itself is already plenty capable of cooling itself, the feature has some logic to it. Chassis fans are usually slaved to the motherboard, which makes a great deal of sense when the motherboard and its components (i.e. the CPU) are the biggest heat sources. However with the GTX 1060 pushing 120W (and 180W for the full GTX 1080), in most systems the video card is actually the single biggest heat source. So by putting fan headers on the video card, 1 or 2 fans can be set to respond to the video card temperature instead. I don’t have any real guess as to how many users will actually use this feature – this is really just a minor cooling/noise optimization – but it’s a neat idea that shows that ASUS can still think outside the box.

Up next, let’s talk about the card’s RGB lighting feature. Dubbed Aura by ASUS, the company has embedded RGB LEDs on to the PCB and into the fan shroud, allowing the card to be lit up in a number of different patterns and colors. In terms of functionality this is entirely superfluous, but there’s a market for windowed cases for this very reason. For gamers who are the type to show off their systems or just want a bit of extra flair, this certainly makes the STRIX GTX 1060 stand out.

Finally, for display I/O ASUS has deviated from the NVIDIA standard a bit. ASUS has replaced one of the DisplayPorts with another HDMI port, resulting in a 2x DisplayPort, 2x HDMI, 1x DL-DVI-D configuration. ASUS says that they’ve done this for VR headset reasons, swapping ports so that there’s still an open HDMI port after plugging in a VR headset. I see where ASUS is coming from, but at the same time I have mixed feelings about this. The great thing about DisplayPort is that it’s easily convertible to other ports, but an HDMI port is always going to be an HDMI port. Ultimately a second HDMI port isn’t truly necessary – a standard HDMI display will be just fine with an adapter – but if nothing else it does save buyers the hassle of tracking down said adapter.

Moving on, let’s talk about software side of matters. The STRIX GTX 1060 comes with ASUS’s GPU Tweak II software. This software hasn’t substantially changed since the last time we looked at it, so I’ll skip the full rundown here, but in a nutshell it’s a solid GPU monitoring and overclocking suite. It allows for all of the usual clockspeed and fan adjustments, and also serves as the control interface for the 4-pin fan headers ASUS put on the card. The software also includes a couple of additional card profiles: a quiet mode that clamps down on TDP to limit card noise, and an OC mode that applies a marginal further 26MHz (2%) overclock. Standard for ASUS cards, GPU Tweak II also includes a built-in copy of the XSplit game broadcasting software, along with a 1 year premium license.

Overall the STRIX GTX 1060 was meant to be the final word in GTX 1060 cards, and certainly it lives up to that expectation. ASUS has thrown in virtually every premium feature they have, from cooling to lighting, and it definitely makes for a unique card. At the same time however this makes ASUS’s card the most expensive of the GTX 1060s, $315, or a $65 premium over the base GTX 1060 MSRP. So this is a card decidedly priced for enthusiasts as opposed to mainstream gamers.

Meet the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition The Test
Comments Locked

189 Comments

View All Comments

  • Greeba77 - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I don't subscribe to some of the bitchier comments on here and I do read Anandtech because of the depth of the reviews. I do feel a trick or two has been missed on this one, because since the 1080 and 1070 review, the results came out elsewhere to show the low level API performance on the Pascal cards seemed to be a problem (the Vulkan Doom benchmarks were awful compared to the RX480). I was hoping this review would include a deeper dive in to this as it's a potential question mark on the 1060's future proofing vs the RX480.
  • Thermalzeal - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    I will please ask that you use "other" review sites for your insatiable impatient needs.

    No way AnandTech will be left out because it's the only site that Industry professionals actually read these days. And if for some reason this catastrophe happened...I'm pretty sure one call to Anand, and he'll walk right into Jen Hsun's office and take the card right out of his computer. Especially now that he's just hanging out at Apple. ,
  • Colin1497 - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Clearly the last couple months have been unfortunate, as whatever dynamic has happened has corresponded with the most exciting time in the GPU world in years. The question is where he can get back on track. I doubt that Ryan is unaware of all of the issues surrounding this. We will see how he responds. :)
  • just4U - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    100% certain he's aware of the criticisms.. as he does comment on some of them. Also a likely reason why Daniel Williams was brought on board to help with overflow.. Although I'd really like to see Ian take a stab at the video card reviews.. (just for sh... and giggles) as processors are not so interesting these days with incremental bumps... but they all have their niche areas to work with so whatever.

    The only real criticism I have would be the waiting game.. If Ryan says something will be ready on a certain date (or in a few days..) and then it takes weeks.. well shoot that's disappointing and shouldn't happen. But hey.. I was one of those happy with the Preview the Review was just icing on the cake (even if I disagree on the 480 vs 1060 assessment)

    Ryan's good at what he does late or not, many of us look forward to Anandtech's takehome on new Video Cards.
  • ridic987 - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    what about his 480 vs 1060 assessment do you disagree with?
  • just4U - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    He puts it at and around 10% faster than the RX480. The feel I am getting from most who have hands on experience with both cards suggest the 480 might be a little better.

    It reminds me of the 380/960 comparisons online initially.. both excellent products overall but after a lot of time with both I kind of felt ripped off by the 960 which I paid a premium for and it certainly wasn't as good as the 380.
  • Cygni - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Then go start your own review website, nerd. This one ain't yours, and nobody cares about how you think it should be run.
  • Devo2007 - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Actually, very few (if any) sites were sampled Titan X Pascal cards - has nothing to do with Anandtech's review schedule.
  • Nagorak - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    They didn't sample anyone on Titan X it seems like.
  • Tabalan - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    What about RX470? It would be nice to see some decent AIB cards compared. Also, I really would like you to add 2 charts in summary - overall performance and perf/$. This would help comparing your review to other reviews without going though all benchmarks and game tests.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now