First Thoughts

Bringing our first look at AMD’s new architecture to a close, it’s exciting to see the field shape up for the FinFET generation. After over four years since the last great node transition, we once again are making a very welcome jump to a new manufacturing process, bringing us AMD’s Polaris.

AMD learned a lot from the 28nm generation – and more often than not the hard way – and they have put those lessons to good use in Polaris. Polaris’s power efficiency has been greatly increased thanks to a combination of GlobalFoundries 14nm FinFET process and AMD’s own design choices, and as a result, compared to AMD’s last-generation parts, Polaris makes significant strides where it needs to. And this goes not just for energy efficiency, but overall performance/resource efficiency as well.

Because AMD is launching with a mainstream part first they don’t get to claim to be charting any new territory on absolute performance. But by being the first vendor to address the mainstream market with a FinFET-based GPU, AMD gets the honor of redefining the price, performance, and power expectations of this market. And the end result is better performance – sometimes remarkably so – for this high volume market.

Relative to last-generation mainstream cards like the GTX 960 or the Radeon R9 380, with the Radeon RX 480 we’re looking at performance gains anywhere between 45% and 70%, depending on the card, the games, and the memory configuration. As the mainstream market was last refreshed less than 18 months ago, the RX 480 generally isn’t enough to justify an upgrade. However if we extend the window out to cards 2+ years old to things like the Radeon R9 280 and GeForce GTX 760, then we have a generational update and then-some. AMD Pitcairn users (Radeon HD 7800, R9 270) should be especially pleased with the progress AMD has made from one mainstream GPU to the next.

Looking at the overall performance picture, averaged across all of our games, the RX 480 lands a couple of percent ahead of NVIDIA’s popular GTX 970, and similarly ahead of AMD’s own Radeon R9 390, which is consistent with our performance expectations based on AMD’s earlier hints. RX 480 can't touch GTX 1070, which is some 50% faster, but then it's 67% more expensive as well.

Given the 970/390 similarities, from a price perspective this means that 970/390 performance has come down by around $90 since these cards were launched, from $329 to $239 for the more powerful RX 480 8GB, or $199 when it comes to 4GB cards. In the case of the AMD card power consumption is also down immensely as well, in essence offering Hawaii-like performance at around half of the power. However against the GTX 970 power consumption is a bit more of a mixed bag – power consumption is closer than I would have expected under Crysis 3 –  and this is something to further address in our full review.

Finally, when it comes to the two different memory capacities of the RX 480, for the moment I’m leaning strongly towards the 8GB card. Though the $40 price increase represents a 20% price premium, history has shown that when mainstream cards launch at multiple capacities, the smaller capacity cards tend to struggle far sooner than their larger counterparts. In that respect the 8GB RX 480 is far more likely to remain useful a couple of years down the road, making it a better long-term investment.

Wrapping things up then, today’s launch of the Radeon RX 480 puts AMD in a good position. They have the mainstream market to themselves, and RX 480 is a strong showing for their new Polaris architecture. AMD will have to fend off NVIDIA at some point, but for now they can sit back and enjoy another successful launch.

Meanwhile we’ll be back in a few days with our full review of the RX 480, so be sure to stay tuned.

Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

449 Comments

View All Comments

  • Badelhas - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    No Virtual Reality benchmarks? This doesn't sound like AnandTech. That's the main reason I am interested in gpu's nowadays. What a disappointment...
  • T1beriu - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    As you can read in the headline, this was a PREVIEW.
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    The VR benchmarking situation is currently poor. I'll have something for the full review, but we don't have any good VR benchmarks like we do standard displays. VR Mark and VRScore should be released soon.
  • IntoGraphics - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Any MXGP2 players here?
    What are your thoughts about RX 480 8GB playing MXGP2 at 1440p@60fps?
    Recommended GPUs are GTX 970 and R9 390. But this video shows a GTX 970 in-game already at 100% at 1080p with maxed out settings.
    I'm assembling an X99 based PC. i7-6800K, 32GB 3200MHz DDR4.
  • IntoGraphics - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Link to the vid : https://youtu.be/e8y3IR-7YIU
  • D. Lister - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    You're "into graphics", yet instead of going for a "mid-end CPU/mid-end GPU" combo, you would rather go for "high-end CPU/Low-end GPU"? If e.g., you went instead with an i5/1070, you would probably be able to down-sample from 3K to 1440p and still have a locked 60FPS.
  • fanofanand - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    He is trying to get "followers" for his youtube channel. Don't even click the link or you will drive up his view count, which will only encourage him to spam comments with more links to his video.
  • D. Lister - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    No worries, I never click on random forum links, unless it is porn, lol. Just kidding.
  • IntoGraphics - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Are the reference RX 480 cards going up to other reference cards in this comparison?
    Or were some or all of their competitors equipped with aftermarket coolers and factory overclock?
    What was compared here?
  • sparrowkhx - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    AMD hype again, 2 RX 480s probably beat a single 1070 while consuming twice the power and ultimately being a similar cost... They definitely aren't going to beat a 1080 and I'm even more glad that I purchased an EVGA 1070 FTW for 429.

    Additionally, I haven't been on Anandtech since the 1080 preview, seriously what is the deal with all these previews and missing reviews? I'm more interested in reading the reviews than random articles and other places are actually doing full reviews not previews.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now