Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Intel's Pentium 4 570J - Will 3.8GHz do the trick?
Intel's Pentium 4 570J - Will 3.8GHz do the trick?
Date: November 14th, 2004
Topic: CPU & Chipset
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi
Buy the AMD ADA4000ASBOX 1MB Socket 4000 939
Blank
 Amazon $289.95
 
 

Power Consumption

To measure power consumption we looked at overall system power consumption and tried to keep as many variables static. There are some basic differences which we cannot get around, mainly that the 925X uses lower voltage DDR-II while the nForce4 uses regular DDR, but for the most part our results were quite controlled. We also included power consumption figures from 130nm Socket-939 Athlon 64 3200+ and 3000+ chips, which as you may know, do not exist. The reason we did this was to show the sharp contrast to the power consumption figures of the 90nm 3500+ we've included in the charts below.

We measured power consumption in two states: idle sitting at the Windows desktop and under load while running our Windows Media Encoder 9 test, which proved to be one of the most strenuous CPU tests we ran as it pretty much isolated the CPU subsystem.

The Pentium 4 570J tops the charts as the heaviest power consumer out of our collection of CPUs here, which is no surprise. Since the 570J here is a different chip than the other Pentium 4s, its not too unsual to see slightly lower idle power consumption given that different chips in the Pentium 4 family can have different operating voltages.

We can't wait until AMD brings more of their Athlon 64 chips down to 90nm next year so that we may have an even cooler running Athlon 64 4000+.

System Power Consumption IDLE

System Power Consumption LOAD

Final Words   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

40 Comments - Last by pplapeu, 1909 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by FinalFantasy, 1913 days ago
Same old same old...

It's the same old thing man...Intel releases their "new" chip clocked at "whatever speed" with "whatever features" and AMD continues to dominate and stay on top. I don't even have to say anything to back this up...the benchmarks say all.......go look!

Go buy a 90nm S939 A64 and be happy you've just bought the best chip on the market.

Reply
No Subject by AtaStrumf, 1913 days ago
I've probably said this before, but I really like those tables with % numbers. You might wonna switch everything over to it. It gives a much more precise picture of diffence than those graphs.

Reply
No Subject by michaelpatrick33, 1913 days ago
The power consumption at load is a tad high for the 3.8 at being nearly twice as high as the 3500+. 226 vs. 114. That trend is obviously why Intel killed the 4.0 and beyond and the Tejas I would imagine. I wonder how much the 600 series chips from Intel will be with the extremely expensive L2 cache vs the current 3.6 and 3.8 chips.

Reply
No Subject by Dustswirl, 1913 days ago
I don't understand how the A64 3500 90nm consumes less power then the A64 3000 (512/2CH) that is supposed to be also a 90nm part...

Reply
No Subject by michaelpatrick33, 1913 days ago
#4. They are using the 754 130nm core 3000+. That is why they say 90nm beside the 3500+ and not any of the other AMD64's

Reply
No Subject by Dustswirl, 1913 days ago
Hmmmm so 2CH isn't like dual channel or? coz afaik 754 is single channel!
Thx for the info :)

Reply
No Subject by Dustswirl, 1913 days ago
Quote:
"[...]We also included power consumption figures from 130nm Socket-939 Athlon 64 3200+ and 3000+ chips, which as you may know, do not exist.[...]"

Mea culpa...

Reply
No Subject by Glassmaster, 1913 days ago
#6: I'm pretty sure they downclocked a 130nm 939 3500+ for those measurements.

Glassmaster.

Reply
No Subject by michaelpatrick33, 1913 days ago
#6 You are right probably since they didn't mention 754 and that would give more parameters for the test. Good catch. They simply downclocked the 130nm 939 3500+.

Reply
No Subject by michaelpatrick33, 1913 days ago
I meant #8 not #6 for the above post sorry

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 4

Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
Report Unlicensed Business Software Use
Earn Up to $1 Million by Reporting Unlicensed Software Use. Fill Out Our Form!




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank




pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information