Intel's server CPU portfolio just got more diversified and complex with the launch of the Intel Xeon E3-1200 V4 at Computex 2015.  It is basically the same chip as the Core i7 "Broadwell" desktop that Ian reviewed yesterday: inside we find four Broadwell cores and a Crystal Well-backed Iris Pro GPU, baked with Intel's state-of-the-art 14 nm process. The Xeon enables ECC RAM support, PCI-passthrough, and VT-D, the former two being features that the desktop chips obviously lack, and VT-D only being present in some desktop chips.

But the current line-up of the Xeon E3-1200 v4 based upon Broadwell is not a simple replacement for the current Xeon E3 1200 v3 "Haswell", which we tested a few months ago. Traditionally, the Xeon E3 was about either workstations or all kinds of low-end servers. 

It looks like the current Xeon E3-1200 v4 is somewhat a niche product. Besides being a chip for workstations with moderate graphics power, Intel clearly positions the chip as a video transcoding and VDI platform. It looks like - once again - Intel is delivering what AMD promised a long time ago. AMD's Berlin, a quad steamroller with Radeon GPU was supposed to address this market, but the product did not seem to convince the OEMs.

Intel claims that the 65W TDP E3-1285L v4 was able to decode 14 1080p (at 30 fps) 20Mbps streams, four or 40% more than on the Xeon E3-1286L v3, which could only sustain 10 video streams. Another use are virtual desktops that use PCI device passthrough to give the virtual machine (VM) full access to the GPU. That way of working is very attractive for an IT manager: it enables centralized management of graphical workstation in a secure datacenter.  

But it is should be noted that this kind of virtualization technology comes with drawbacks. First of all, there is only one VM that gets access to the GPU: one VM literally owns the GPU (unlike NVIDIA's GRID technology). Secondly you add network latency, something that many graphical designers will not like as adds lag compared to the situation where they are working on a workstation with a beefy OpenGL card. 

Below you can find the table of the 5 new SKUs. I added a sixth column with the Xeon-D, so you can easily compare.  

Intel Xeon E3 Broadwell Lineup For
comparison:
  E3-1258L v4 E3-1265L v4 E3-1278L v4 E3-1285 v4 E3-1285L v4 Xeon D-1540
Price $481 $418 $546 $557 $445 $581
Cores 4 4 4 4 4 8
Threads 8 8 8 8 8 16
Base CPU Freq. 1.8 GHz 2.3 GHz 2 GHZ 3.5 GHZ 3.4 GHZ 2 GHz
Turbo CPU Freq. 3.2 GHz 3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz 2.6 GHz
Graphics P5700
1 GHz
Iris Pro P6300 (GT3e)
1.05 GHz
Iris Pro P6300 (GT3e)
1 GHz
Iris Pro P6300 (GT3e)
1.15 GHz
Iris Pro P6300 (GT3e)
1.15 GHz
none
TDP 47W 35W 47W 95W 65W 45W
DRAM Freq.
(DDR3L)
1600MHz 1866MHz 1600MHz 1866MHz 1866MHz DDR4-2133
L3 Cache 6MB 6MB 6MB 6MB 6MB 12 MB
L4 Cache none 128MB (Crystal Well) 128MB (Crystal Well) 128MB (Crystal Well) 128MB (Crystal Well) none

It is pretty clear that the Xeon-D is a much more attractive server chip for most purposes: twice the amount of cores, twice the amount L3-cache, while remaining inside a 45W TDP power envelop. On top of that, the new Xeon E3 v4 still needs a separate C226 chipset and is limited to 32 GB of RAM. The Xeon-D does not need a separate chipset and supports up to 128 GB of DDR-4. 

In summary, the current Xeon E3-1200 v4 lineup is only interesting if you need a server chip for video transcoding, centralized workstation or a local workstation with relatively modest graphical needs. 

The Atom C2000 and hopefully the X-Gene 2 chips are the SoCs to watch if you want ultra dense and relatively cheap server cpus for basic server processing tasks (static web content, object caching). The Xeon E3-1240Lv3 is probably still the best "single/lowly threaded performance"/watt champion. And the Xeon-D? Well, we will be reviewing that one soon... 

POST A COMMENT

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • tabascosauz - Wednesday, June 03, 2015 - link

    Looks like Intel finally reined in the E3s. For the past 5 years, the E3s have been rising in popularity as good gaming CPUs. By setting a price point higher than that of the 5775C, Intel basically has killed the E3v4's gaming prospects. Reply
  • austinsguitar - Wednesday, June 03, 2015 - link

    completely agree!!! there was a reason to buy cheap e3's... and now with graphic they ruin the price points for everyone.... intel... WE DON"T WANT YOU FKKKKKKING GWAPHICSSSSS Reply
  • Casper42 - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Then just wait a few more months for SkyLake instead. Reply
  • aakash_sin - Wednesday, October 07, 2015 - link

    +1 Reply
  • tipoo - Wednesday, June 03, 2015 - link

    It's kind of annoying. The Xeons were the one way to get by without paying for the extra silicon you wouldn't use if you had discreet graphics, often over half the die size. Seems wasteful to not have the option to get them without the integrated graphics, but Intel just wants to eat up a bigger part of the BoM of your computer. Reply
  • patrickjp93 - Thursday, June 04, 2015 - link

    Actually it's about undermining Nvidia's low end sales and preparing its graphics architecture for deployment on E5/E7 Skylake Xeons. Intel intends to knock Nvidia out of the HPC space altogether so it can legally go through with a merger. Seriously people, it's obvious why Intel isn't pushing CPU power on the desktop side while simultaneously is going all in on the Xeon Phi and its integrated graphics. This is the same company that beat IBM out of the server market once before starting from nothing. The game is much bigger than the PC market. Reply
  • hingsun - Thursday, June 04, 2015 - link

    AGREE! Reply
  • Refuge - Thursday, June 04, 2015 - link

    So you think Intel is knocking nVidia out of the super computer database market in the hopes of being able to buy them up without being shot down?

    (Not sarcastic, truly an honest question, because if so I want to hear more on this theory, it seems interesting and unique.)
    Reply
  • patrickjp93 - Thursday, June 11, 2015 - link

    Yes. Intel's trying to keep AMD alive long enough for it to knock Nvidia out of competition for a buyout, and simultaneously Nvidia is trying to knock AMD out of business so it can swipe up x86_64 and set itself up for better market differentiation with PC drying up. If Intel gets Nvidia, IBM, AMD, Qualcomm, and eventually even Samsung won't be able to stand against it. Reply
  • Vlad_Da_Great - Friday, July 03, 2015 - link

    The licensing agreement INTC/NVDA ends at 2016. So after that your theory might be correct. But if AMD files for bankruptcy which I have predicted long ago in 2017. INTC will face long litigations from the different governing bodies in US, and EU and your theory will be DOA. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now