Concluding Remarks - Unbeatable Value

It is quite rare that I start the concluding section of any review with a positive spin in the headine itself. The UFO Power Center has been shipping for almost a year now, and I can only say that I am a bit surprised it took me this long to find out about this awesome device.

The UFO Power Center is a device with a unique combination of features. In the home automation area, it competes with the Belkin We-Mo Wi-Fi switch. By providing three extra outlets and bundling energy management features for slightly more than twice the cost of the We-Mo, the UFO Power Center is able to acquit itself quite well against the Belkin unit. In the power measurement area, it can replace up to four Kill-a-Watts (for approximately the same cost) or four Watts Up? Pro meters (for a fourth of the cost). The other meters also provide other important line information, but those quantities are already being measured by the ADE7763, and it should just be a matter of updating the firmware to deliver those values. The device can also be used to replace PDUs such as the Web Power Switch from Digital Loggers. The functionality is delivered wirelessly, though the UFO Power Center doesn’t turn out to be cheaper on a per-socket basis. That said, for the extra cost, the user also gets power measurement and energy management features which are not available in the Web Power Switch.

Any user considering one of the Belkin We-Mo switches or a Kill A Watt type product or a PDU would do little wrong in choosing the UFO Power Center over them. The product gets our wholehearted recommendation. That said, we reviewers are hard to please completely. Visible Energy should pay attention to the following drawbacks of the device while planning future products / firmware revisions:

For the average consumer:

  • Bulky, industrial design might not go down well with everyone. Despite the size, it is sometimes difficult to plug in wall warts, i.e, adapters directly connected to the electrical outlet.
  • Though static scheduling of socket state as well as limited roles support is available, rules-dependent scenes (such as those from ifttt.com) are not directly supported. Users shouldn’t purchase this item under the impression that it would magically lower their electricity bills automatically.
  • Lack of physical buttons or switches implies that the only way to toggle the state of the outlets is through Wi-Fi.
  • Ad-hoc Wi-Fi based setup might be a bit overwhelming for the non-tech-savvy consumers
  • No official Android app yet.
  • Visible Energy recommends against connecting very heavy loads. That said, the relay is rated for 15A, which should be plenty for most devices in the household.
  • The unit doesn’t have noise / surge suppression, and the recommendation is against connecting this device to a power strip (though I connected mine to a surge protector during the course of the review and faced no issues)

For the geeks:

  • There is no way to change the HTTP access port. This might be useful in the case where the user cooks up a custom script to control / query the unit, but wants to use it from an external network. It is possible to set up port forwarding to access the unit via the default HTTP port. However, in the case that this port already forwards to another machine in the local network, the user has no way to access the UFO over the Internet without modifying the HTTP port of the other machine.
  • Instantaneous power consumption is updated every second, even though a faster update frequency is possible. For example, the Extech power meter records five values every 2 seconds.
  • The power APIs only report the active power. The system is capable of reporting voltage, current, reactive power and power factor, but the reviewed firmware release didn’t expose them.
  • As a PDU product (or, in a rackmount environment), a wired Ethernet connection is sometimes preferable to Wi-Fi (Visible Energy might want to do a separate product for that market)

Despite the long list of complaints / suggestions above, we are big fans of the UFO Power Center. The fact that it is Visible Energy’s debut product makes it even more praiseworthy. Visible Energy might face some trouble convincing the average consumer about the benefits of a $130 power strip, but tech-savvy folks will find the price a bargain for the wealth of features offered.

Update: Readers have chimed in with solutions for a couple of the drawbacks mentioned above. With reference to the absence of port configuration in the UFO Power Center, it is possible to configure most routers to map a port on the outside that is different than inside in the forwarding. For the issue with the wall warts, consumers could use some really short extensions cables (there are even pass-through versions to double up the number of devices).

Taking Advantage of the Open APIs
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • OCedHrt - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    It does look like it would fit then?
  • ssddaydream - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    I actually would enjoy having a device like this if it were in the common surge suppressor form factor. I think the lamp-like UFO appearance detracts from the product. I usually mount stuff like this behind the desk where it is still accessible, but out of view. I'm sure I could find a way to get this thing mounted and tucked away, but it takes up valuable extra space needlessly.
  • ZETAPIERRE - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    We have one made that is WiFi. It has only a duplex receptacle, but each half is individually controlled. It too uses 16A relays, the same type. We use them to collect power information and to control equipment at work. We power the compressors, printers, solderbench, etc... We also have a control in the system tray that allows employees to turn on the equipment. If they forget to turn it off, it goes off under a timer. It's software, so you can make it do anything, even send out emails.
  • Flunk - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    "There is no way to change the HTTP access port. This might be useful in the case where the user cooks up a custom script to control / query the unit, but wants to use it from an external network. It is possible to set up port forwarding to access the unit via the default HTTP port. However, in the case that this port already forwards to another machine in the local network, the user has no way to access the UFO over the Internet without modifying the HTTP port of the other machine."

    A lot of routers, even cheap ones, support routing with different external and internal ports. E.G. mapping port 3333 to port 80 on 192.168.1.1 so this isn't that big of a deal.
  • IKeelU - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    So many of my power cables are longer than they need to be (for my needs), so setting up my home theater or adding a new component always involves some form of cable management to ensure I don't have spaghetti back there. This design, while a bit cumbersome, would alleviate that.
  • nathanddrews - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    This is odd for an eco-driven device. Why would I want to buy something that consumes that much power on its own (WiFi/bulb) in order to monitor and regulate power? Seems counterintuitive, but I suppose there are many people that don't have wired connections in their homes (sad). The option would be nice. The fact that it is completely fugly as a lamp is also confusing. That last bit is subjective, I realize...

    Looking foward to future revisions, though! I'd love to have a wired rackmount version for my server rack, my home theater, and then conventional looking power strips for other power-hungry areas (washer/dryer, office devices, other entertainment areas, powertools in workshop, etc.).
  • NeBlackCat - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    +1 for rackmount version

    As an eco fascist I'd be tempted to have my house electrics rewired from the standard multiple "multidrop" circuits, to a single star configuration where every power outlet/device goes to a UFO port.

    The things I could then do...
  • DanNeely - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    The reason most outlets are wired in a multiloop fashion is to minimize copper use. Replacing an N outlet loop with N outlets wired in a star pattern will use approximately N times more copper.

    After being convicted by the court in eco Nuremberg for wasteful use of resources extracted by destructive mining you wouldn't be able to do much beyond pushing up daisies.
  • taltamir - Friday, October 26, 2012 - link

    By law, businesses must be wired in a star configuration rather than multidrop.
    Multidrop is used because its cheaper, but its less safe as multiple outlets share a single line.
  • ironargonaut - Sunday, November 4, 2012 - link

    In what country? I can overload a single 20A receptacle by creating a short just as easy as a 10 receptacles on the same loop. The only thing that matters is you keep the breaker small enough to trip before the wire insulation fails. I.E. don't use 14guage wire with a 20A breaker...etc.

    Technically all homes/businesses use a star config as you have multiple breakers, but you also have multiple lights/outlets per breaker. Or am I defining "star" config differently then you?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now