by Andrew Cunningham on 11/8/2011 3:30:00 PM
Posted in Browsers , Firefox

Another six weeks have gone by, which means that it's time for a new Firefox release: Firefox 8.0 was moved to the stable release channel today, and it features a few more visible improvements over Firefox 7.0, which brought mostly under-the-hood updates.

Most of the user-facing changes involve add-ons: a new add-on selection dialog box is shown at first launch, giving users to option to enable and disable add-ons. Most automatically installed third-party add-ons (such as those added by Skype, Acrobat Pro, and other less legitimate programs) are now disabled by default, though they can be re-enabled manually. Add-ons installed by users will usually be unaffected by this decision, which seems to be an IE9-like effort on Mozilla's part to keep the browser running smoothly by disabling unwanted or potentially buggy add-ons.

Additionally, users who like the tabs from previous browsing sessions to load automatically can now turn on a feature in the browser's preferences that doesn't load the contents of tabs until those tabs are selected, reducing the time it takes to re-open a busy browsing session.

Lastly, heavy Twitter users may appreciate the fact that the microblogging site has now been added as a search option by default, alongside long-standing search options like Google and Wikipedia.

Under the hood, Mozilla has made performance and memory improvements when using the <audio> and <video> tags, has added support for HTML5 context menus, and has fixed security and stability issues, among a few other things. For a complete list of changes, the release notes are linked below for your convenience.

Source: Mozilla

What about Seamonkey 2.5? by geekfool on Tuesday, November 08, 2011
This is the first Firefox release in a while not to be in synch with a SeaMonkey release (lately SeaMonkey 2.X is based on Firefox X+3).Has the recent server crash broken this?
geekfool
RE: What about Seamonkey 2.5? by jed22281 on Wednesday, November 09, 2011
Huh? They've rarely been in sync over the yrs.
Tis not entirely feasible....
jed22281
Remember when... by rstove02 on Tuesday, November 08, 2011
I remember when minor updates resulted in one of the numbers to the right of the first decimal point increasing.
rstove02
RE: Remember when... by JarredWalton on Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Blame Google and Chrome. :-\

Welcome to Firefox 4.3.1, a.k.a. Firefox 8.
JarredWalton
RE: Remember when... by Zoomer on Wednesday, November 09, 2011
So you're saying mozilla can't think for itself and do what it wants to?
Zoomer
RE: Remember when... by Belard on Wednesday, November 09, 2011
There have been more changes in Opera 11.50 ~ 11.52 than firefox 4.0~"8.0".

And still, Opera kicks Chrome and ff in features and functionality... and stupid ff team went so far and copied the look of Opera to their browser, that is how lame they are are.

An Awesome feature of Opera... ever close the wrong window with tabs? Or closed tabs hours ago and then realize you needed a tab? Opera allows you to easily bring it back.

Tab Grouping rocks on Opera.
Belard
RE: Remember when... by bigboxes on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Put down the fanboi sauce. :eyeroll
bigboxes
RE: Remember when... by inighthawki on Tuesday, November 08, 2011
This is retarded. They are trying too hard to be chrome. I choose to use Firefox because it's NOT chrome, so stop trying to copy what they do!
inighthawki
RE: Remember when... by JHBoricua on Tuesday, November 08, 2011
What's retarded is ppl getting worked up over something so silly as a version number. I use Firefox simply because it works for me. I couldn't care less about the version scheme.
JHBoricua
RE: Remember when... by CharonPDX on Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Except some uses (especially corporate environments and corporate-made web apps) have policies based on "major version" numbers.

My company's web-managed app only has Firefox 3 as the latest approved Firefox. Our software gives nasty warnings if you're running too new a version. We only add new versions about once every six months to one year. And, of course, it requires testing. So we'll probably have FF6 (MAYBE 7) supported in our next release.

It doesn't just inconvenience US, it annoys our customers. The fact that Firefox said "we don't care about the corporate user" doesn't matter.

Hell, *I* like to use Firefox, but my own test environment bitches at me every time I try to. (Of course, we don't support Chrome at all.)
CharonPDX
Latest from AnandTech