by Anand Lal Shimpi on 9/26/2011 6:15:00 PM
Posted in Tablets , Samsung , android , Honeycomb , Galaxy Tab 8.9

When I first met the Galaxy Tab 8.9 in Florida earlier this year I felt like it may be the perfect tablet form factor: small enough to be really portable, while large enough to really be a tablet. Our own Jason Inofuentes is live at Samsung's press event where the company just announced availability of the 8.9-inch Galaxy Tab. The new tablet will be available nation-wide starting October 2nd in 16GB and 32GB configurations for $469 and $569, respectively. 

The specs of the Galaxy Tab 8.9 are virtually identical to its bigger brother. You still get a 1280 x 800 PLS display, just in a smaller form factor. NVIDIA powers the tablet, Samsung lists the SoC as a dual-core T250S, presumably running at the same clocks as the Tegra 2 in the 10.1. 

The weight also drops a bit to 447g. The 8.9 features two cameras (2MP front facing and 3MP rear facing), is WiFi-only and ships with Android 3.1 with Samsung's TouchWiz UX. Battery capacity is listed at 6100mAh. Jason should be getting our review sample in the next hour, expect a quick preview in the next day followed by our usual in-depth treatment next week!

Samsung 2011 Tablet Comparison
  Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
SoC NVIDIA Tegra 2 (Dual ARM Cortex A9 @ 1GHz) NVIDIA Tegra 2 (Dual ARM Cortex A9 @ 1GHz)
GPU NVIDIA GeForce NVIDIA GeForce
RAM 1GB 1GB
Display 1280 x 800 PLS 1280 x 800 PLS
NAND 16GB 16GB
Dimensions 230.9 x 157.8 x 8.6mm 256.6 x 172.9 x 8.6mm
Weight 447g 565g
Price $469 $499

 

Only a $30 price difference? by JohnnyRockets911 on Monday, September 26, 2011
More than an inch less in viewable screen size and only a $30 price difference?

Who the heck would buy an 8.9 when the 10.1 is only $30 more?

And why isn't this $399?
JohnnyRockets911
RE: Only a $30 price difference? by jordanclock on Monday, September 26, 2011
For some people, bigger isn't always better?
jordanclock
RE: Only a $30 price difference? by pcgeek101 on Monday, September 26, 2011
True -- for me though, the only reason I'd buy the 8.9 is for inherently higher DPI. Same resolution on smaller screen = win.
pcgeek101
still waiting for a 1920x1080 tablet by surt on Monday, September 26, 2011
And waiting and waiting. First one out the gate gets my money.
surt
RE: still waiting for a 1920x1080 tablet by pcgeek101 on Monday, September 26, 2011
No one cares about screen resolution :( It makes me sad to see us still in the dark ages.
pcgeek101
RE: still waiting for a 1920x1080 tablet by bennyg on Monday, September 26, 2011
question is, wouldya pay a coupla hundred premium for it over a lower res same size model.

OEMs think not enough buyers would, so it don't get built. Bloody good 14" and lower 1080p on laptops still aren't reality except for the $4k Sony Z and not many of them need to be sold at that price for profit to be made.
bennyg
RE: still waiting for a 1920x1080 tablet by pcgeek101 on Monday, September 26, 2011
I bought a 15" Dell Inspiron about 7 years ago that had a 1920x1200 matte display. It was incredibly beautiful, and only cost around $1000. Why are we 7 years later and still cannot achieve high resolutions at a low cost?
pcgeek101
RE: still waiting for a 1920x1080 tablet by sprockkets on Tuesday, September 27, 2011
The dpi on your example is the same as the 10.1 Samsung tablet.

Soooooo....
sprockkets
And another one bites the dust! by lurker22 on Monday, September 26, 2011
Here we go again, moron manufacturers think people will pay iPad prices for non-ipads

Wake me up when its $99
lurker22
RE: And another one bites the dust! by insurgent on Monday, September 26, 2011
Enjoy your everlasting sleep, evreyone else will.
insurgent
Latest from AnandTech