Motorola Droid X: Thoroughly Reviewed
by Brian Klug & Anand Lal Shimpi on 7/20/2010 4:27:00 PM
Posted in Smartphones , Motorola Droid X , OMAP
Buy the eforcity 270309 eforcity Amazoncom
Amazon
$16.00

You have to hand it to Motorola; as little as a year ago their future looked bleak. Android was still in its infancy and lacking polish, mainstream devices running it were few, and there weren’t public or visible signs of any forthcoming devices which would challenge the dominance of BlackBerry or iOS, especially from Motorola. A few months later, they launched the Motorola Droid, and a few months after the floodgates opened up - out has poured a steady stream of relatively polished devices running Android 2.x. It’s been breakneck almost, with new flagships every 3 months on average - the latest is Motorola’s Droid X on Verizon - henceforth just 'X.'

You also have to hand it to Verizon for getting its act together. Previously, they were infamous for crippling device hardware and OSes - the Touch Pro notoriously lacked an entire row of keys, and half the RAM. Their smartphone lineup also used to consist entirely of BlackBerries and Windows Mobile devices. That’s all changed.

Since the first Motorola Droid, they’ve been probably the single most vocal proponent of Android, embracing and billing their lineup of “Droids” as serious iPhone alternatives. The unique combination of being the largest carrier and the largest 3G footprint (and the  perception of having above average coverage) has resulted in massive growth of the Android platform. That’s definitely a turnaround for two giants.

Eight months after launch, the Motorola Droid is now a relatively old piece of kit. It’s amazing how fast the market is moving - the fact that an 8 month old handset is now obsolete is a testament to just how breakneck this pace is.

Motorola and HTC are now locked in a battle for dominance of the Android segment on the nation’s largest carrier. On one side is the HTC Incredible, on the other is the X and eventually the Droid 2. Across the aisle at Sprint, HTC has the EVO 4G. If you’re interested in a smartphone of the Android variety, you’ve got the most options ever right now, and the X is the newest contender. Let’s dive in.
 

Form Factor and Build Impressions
screen comparison photo by czesiu on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
great review!

higher res version for this please:)
http://images.anandtech.com/doci/3826/DROIDX-AnandTech-4578.jpg
czesiu
RE: screen comparison photo by Brian Klug on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
I'm actually going to dump all the screen comparison photos I've got (there are quite a few) into a gallery, then you can peruse at native resolution. Should be up in a little bit ;)

-Brian
Brian Klug
What's up Anand? by hatter_india on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Fantastic review but I expect no less from AnandTech. But there are a couple of bloopers:

1- OMAP 3630 is third mobile chip to use 45nm process. First is of course A4. But second is Samsung's Hummingbird, a chip that the korean company designed with help of Intrinsity. This chip is found in Galaxy S or its variants. Samsung is the same company that also tweaked A4, which incidentally is fabbed by Samsung. Too many coincidences ;-)

2- A comparison to PowerVR SGX 540 found on Galaxy S would have been interesting as according to Samsung SGX 540 is almost three times more powerful than SGX535.

3- Droid X should have also been compared with Galaxy S or any of its variants like Captivate, Vibrant etc
hatter_india
RE: What's up Anand? by hatter_india on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
This line: Samsung is the same company that also tweaked A4, which incidentally is fabbed by Samsung

Should read: Intrinsity is the same company that also tweaked A4, which incidentally is fabbed by Samsung
hatter_india
How about a Galaxy S? by Goty on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Does AT have any plans to review any of the Galaxy S phones? I just picked up a Captivate on Sunday and I'd love to see how it stacks up. I just ran the Neocore benchmark and got around 55 FPS, which speaks well of the GPU, but I'd like to see results from the other tests you guys do.
Goty
RE: How about a Galaxy S? by Brian Klug on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Hey Goty,

We definitely have plans to do reviews of all of the Galaxy S phones we can get our hands on. I'm working on getting them as soon as possible ;)

I'm also pretty excited to explore that SoC and compare.

-Brian
Brian Klug
RE: How about a Galaxy S? by Goty on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Good to know. I ran most of the same benchmarks on my own and it seems that the Captivate is actually slower in the Sunspider test than any of the newer TI or Qualcomm SoCs, but faster in everything else. Very curious.

Anyhow, looking forward to the review(s)!
Goty
RE: How about a Galaxy S? by metafor on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Sunspider is kinda wonky. It can vary depending on what version of the browser you're using. In either case, unless you know you have the exact same software, it's usually not a good way to test processor speed.
metafor
RE: How about a Galaxy S? by FozzyofAus on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Great to hear.

The Galaxy S has been on sale in here in Australia for a while and I'd love to see how it compares to the HTC EVO and Droid X.

Regards,
Michael.
FozzyofAus
RE: How about a Galaxy S? by FozzyofAus on Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Background reading on performance from another site:
http://androidandme.com/2010/07/news/droid-x-vs-galaxy-s-and-more-with-quadrant-professional/

No doubt your review will be even better when it's ready.

Regards,
Michael.
FozzyofAus
Latest from AnandTech