EncryptEase Complete Software - The Burn Process

The burn process is more than just writing the data to the disc. There are a total of 4 or 5 steps, depending on what we select for comparing data. In the first step, the data is prepared for the entire process. The second step involves encrypting the data followed by creating an image file on the hard drive selected. These first three tasks finished fairly quickly because of our Athlon 64 based test bed. We're assuming that it will take much longer on a 133MHz processor, which is the minimum requirement for a Windows 2000 system.

The fourth step in the entire process is writing the prepared image to the disc. The length of this step depends on the optical writer that is used. Obviously, a drive that can't write to a CD-R faster than 24x will not be able to take full advantage of the 40x maximum speed of the media. The final step compares the written data to the original, which, again, is an optional step.

Once all of the steps have finished, the EncryptEase software will present us with a simple "Write process complete." dialog box. After clicking on "OK", we can see the session and the files on the disc. If there are multiple sessions on the disc, we will be able to see each session by clicking on the associated tab. The tabs themselves are labeled with numbers, which make it difficult to differentiate the session that you want to access if there are more than just a couple of sessions on the disc. Actual descriptive text labels would have been much more helpful. Hopefully, Ricoh incorporates something like that into their DVD based EncryptEase media.


EncryptEase Complete Software – Create a New Session EncryptEase Complete Software – Extracting Encrypted Files
Comments Locked

18 Comments

View All Comments

  • MercenaryForHire - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    No crossplatform support, extra driver layers for the optical drives, questionable burning software, and no specified or controllable encryption level. Oh boy, where do I sign up?

    I'll stick with RAR+PAR2 thanks. If it's good enough for the warez "industry" it's good enough for me.

    - M4H
  • VirtualLarry - Sunday, February 19, 2006 - link

    Glad to see I'm not the only one using that solution.. I've had "bad things happen" writing precious data, especially to CD-RWs. PAR2 can be a life-saver.

    I want to know something though.. instead of a windows-only solution such as Ricoh's - why not mass produce recordable media with a per-disc mfg-unique serial number, perhaps on a bar code imprinted on the inner ring (like GameCube discs have). That would allow, in conjunction with an additional program and key, per-media unique encryption keys. Treat the barcode data like a salt, or use it much like MS's EFS uses per-file keys, derived from some master passphrase (not stored on the media). Wouldn't that make more sense? And please... on CD-Rs? Prehistoric tech these days, for bulk optical data storage.
  • NeonAura - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    On pages one and five, you say "let's" us do something, etc. In English, the apostraphe indicates a contraction. For example, let's means let us. If you mean lets as in to allow, you say "lets" instead of "let's." A good example: This operation lets us enter the main menu. Please do fix. Thanks.
  • Questar - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    Maybe I'm just stupid, but I found the article very difficult to read. The grammer throughout the article is bad.
  • kmmatney - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    Please shut down the Anandtech web site until all grammatical and spelling errors have been fixed.
  • Phiro - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Since the speeling and the grammar police are in full force, I will chime in that the article was abit tough to read quickly - the English was abit stilted and the thought processes behind them were a little tough to discern. It also read abit too much like a brochure from Ricoh, and the screenshots were waaay over the top.

    Also, why would Anandtech be working with Ricoh to bring us the latest in this type of news?

    Isn't that just the weirdest thing to say and/or expect from a website like this?
  • PuravSanghani - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    Thank you for letting us know. "Lets" go ahead and fix the error, shall we?
  • NeonAura - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    You'd use "let's" in that situation. Learn your grammar, son!
  • NeonAura - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    For info, I know that was a joke :P
  • JonB - Tuesday, February 7, 2006 - link

    This is aimed at managers and supervisors and directors of companies. They have data that they think should be protected before sending through the mail. Keep in mind, these people are just now getting computers with burners on their desktop or laptop. They only learned how to burn a CD six months ago and they don't care how much a CD costs, just that they can get one from the supply cabinet when needed.

    If this is marketed properly in trade journals, they'll sell millions. This is encryption for dummies.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now