Asus P5AD2 Premium: Features and Layout


 Asus P5AD2 Premium Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket 775 Pentium 4 (Prescott)
Chipset Intel 925X/ICH6R
Bus Speeds 100MHz to 400MHz (in 1MHz increments)
PCI Speeds To CPU, 33.33, Auto
DDR2 Speeds Auto, 400, 533, 600
Core Voltage 1.4375V to 1.7875V in 0.0125V increments
DRAM Voltage 1.80V to 2.10V in 0.1V increments
Chipset Voltage Auto, 1.5V, 1.6V
FSB Termination Voltage Auto, 1.2, 1.4
Memory Slots Four 240-pin DDR2 Slots
Dual-Channel Unbuffered Memory to 4GB
Expansion Slots 1 PCIe x16 Slot
2 PCIe x1 slot
3 PCI Slots
Onboard SATA/IDE RAID 4 SATA 150 drives by ICH6R
Can be combined in RAID 0, 1, Intel Matrix
plus 4 SATA 150 RAID by Sil3114R
(8 Total SATA ports)
Onboard IDE One Standard ATA100/66 by ICH6R
(2 100/66/33 drives)
Plus One IDE RAID by IT 8212F
(2 133/100/66, RAID 0, 1, JBOD)
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports
3 IEEE 1394b FireWire Ports by TI 1394b
Onboard LAN 2 X Gigabit PCIe LAN
Both by Marvel 88E8053
Onboard Audio CMedia CMI9880 (Intel HD)
8-Channel with SPDIF in/out
Wireless LAN WiFi 802.11g Included
Tested BIOS 1005 Beta 002

Asus calls their new 925X board the P5AD2 Premium, and the board is clearly top-of-the-line in every way. All of the Asus Proactive AI (Artificial Intelligence) features are included, and Asus proudly advertises the overclocking features of the P5AD2 Premium. This includes a special cooling plate on the bottom of the board in the CPU area that Asus calls Stack Cool.

Asus includes Dual Gigabit PCI Express LAN on the P5AD2, with both LAN ports powered by the new Marvel 88E8053 Ethernet controllers. You will also find a complete WiFi set-up with an 802.11g card and antenna included for the WiFi slot. Asus has devoted a lot of resources recently to providing standard-setting Wireless LAN on their motherboards, and the P5AD2 is the culmination of those efforts.

You will also find the premium C-Media CMI9880 codec supporting the Intel High-Definition audio, with 8 channels and Dolby Digital Live technology support. The CMI9880 is the only audio solution in this roundup that has a built-in Dolby AC3 encoder that can actually encode your digital audio into Dolby digital streams, which can then be output to the SPDIF for Dolby Digital playback. The CMI9880 does this real-time for any digital audio in your system to feed Dolby Digital playback. The rest of the boards in the roundup use sound solutions based on the newest Realtek ALC880 High-Definition audio chip, which is also an excellent audio solution, but Asus carries Intel High-Definition (Azalia) audio further on the P5AD2 than on any other board in this roundup. You will also find 3 of the high-speed 'b' versions of IEEE 1394 firewire, which promise double the speed of 1394a ports.

The storage area is one area where the Asus stands above the rest of the boards reviewed here. All of the boards support the ICH6R standard 4 SATA/1 IDE (2drives) configuration. The Asus and Gigabyte add 4 more SATA ports for a total of 8 SATA ports. The Asus goes even further by also adding an ITE controller for 2 more IDE devices for a total of 4.

It is clear that Premium certainly describes the features on the Asus P5AD2, but Premium also refers to the price. The Premium is the most expensive board in this roundup at about $100 more than the Abit AA8. The real question, then, is whether the Asus is worth the premium price. That is a question that you will need to answer based on your individual budget, but there is no other board in this roundup that offers the unique and useful feature set that you will find on the P5AD2.

Asus has also provided a truly complete set of overclocking controls in the BIOS. It is worth noting that the P5AD2 is the only board in the roundup to offer a DDR600 memory speed in addition to the 533 and 400 offered on all the boards. Since we found that the current DDR2 memory was all capable of DDR667 performance, this added 2:3 ratio will allow for running DDR2 at 667 with just a modest CPU overclock, something that will appeal to some users. Asus also provides adjustment of FSB termination voltage, something that we found useful in the extreme overclocking possible on the Asus.



Asus is a manufacturer who pays close attention to the layout of their motherboards. That certainly shows in the P5AD2 Premium. Floppy and Hard Drive connectors are in the preferred upper right board-edge position, where they usually work best in most case designs. The 24-pin power connector and 4-2pin 12V connector are both at board edges where they do not require being snaked across the CPU and restricting air flow. The 8 SATA ports are clustered at the lower right of the board (4 ports) and the bottom edge of the board (4 ports). The additional IDE connector is also near the bottom edge along with the headers for additional SATA and IEEE1384b ports.

The only complaint with the layout will be from those who still use a 4-pin audio header to one of their optical drives, since the audio connector is in the worst possible location at the bottom left of the motherboard. In a tower case, you will need to search for a longer audio cable, not an easy-to-find item, since every audio cable we had on-hand would not reach from the drive to the audio connector in a tower case. This should not be an issue in the more common mid-tower layouts.

The P5AD2 layout is very close to ideal and you will likely be very pleased at the thought that went into the layout of the Asus 925X.

Abit AA8: Overclocking and Stress Testing Asus P5AD2 Premium: Overclocking and Stress Testing
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • jdoor0 - Tuesday, October 26, 2004 - link

    This review has been reviewed:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18896
  • Nige - Tuesday, October 12, 2004 - link

    Does the ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe motherboard have the same overclocking capability as the P5AD2 Premium?
  • skiboysteve - Friday, August 13, 2004 - link

    Wow nice catch. i guess my "(I know... toms sucks)" disclaimer came true.


    yaeh i understand.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    #26 -
    There is now an apology to Asus up at THG. They measured the voltage wrong. We had also measured the voltage and found 1.5 to 1.55 which is well within spec, not 2.1 as they reported. They now acknowledge the correct voltage measurement for the P5AD2 is 1.53V.

    High Northbridge voltage is not the reason the Asus, or any other 925X/915 board, overclocks well. There are far too many simple and wrong explanations for the complex overclocking issues of the 925X/915 chipsets.
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    Page 10
    "...Broadcom attached to the faster PCI Express bus..."

    there is no PCI Express bus, its a point to point protocal.

    Just nitpicking.

    Great review.



    Also, over at Toms (I know... toms sucks) they looked at 9x5 Boards over there and showed that the Asus P5AD2 was running at an astounding 2.1v on the northbridge (1.5v is the stock)

    Something might have to be mentioned about reliability of such out of spec behavior, and cooling concerns. You might want to conduct your own quick test on the voltage with a multimeter.
  • broberts - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    One of the problems with these arguments is that the FX-53 is almost 20% more expensive.

    I've been thinking for a while now that benchmarks should show some form of pricing index so that one can better judge the advantage/disadvantage of the various choices. Just quoting prices isn't ideal, for a host of reasons. I'd suggest, instead, a relative measure. And not just the cost of the particular component being benchmarked. Calculate the cost of the each system used in the benchmarks. Pick one, perhaps the lowest or highest cost one and calculate the relative difference in price. I suggest using the entire system because quite often the choice of one component dictates the available choices for other components. Ideally a relative measure for both the components and entire system would be calculated and published.
  • manno - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    Moo Moo MOO.
  • manno - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    why no Doom3?
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    #21 -
    We will definitely be including Doom 3 benches in future reviews. The only reason they are not included in this 925X roundup is because most of the testing was completed before we had a working copy of Doom 3. You can get a clear idea of how the 925X/Intel 560 performs in Doom 3 in Anand's Doom 3: CPU Battlegrounds review published August 4th at http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
  • kherman - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    Umm, Doom 3 benches?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now