SSD 2015 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

SSD15 Product Benchmarks

View Single Product View Comparison

Bench Results

Samsung 960 Pro 2TB - Samsung Polaris - Samsung 256Gbit MLC V-NAND

Crucial MX300 2050GB - Marvell 88SS1074 - Micron 348Gbit TLC 3D NAND

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

1241

315

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

1038.64

224.88

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

160.9

2571.7

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >100ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.23

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.15

2.46

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

13.42

10.32

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

844.18

257.78

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

122.6

1139

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.08

0.72

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

1.86

0.94

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

1371.96

343.94

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

56.6

440.7

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.01

0.35

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

0.72

0.33

Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

444.17

227.29

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

2.56

1.48

Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

137.69

52.05

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

2.07

1.19

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

1552.87

311.74

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

4.72

3.28

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

1916.83

464.23

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

4.66

2.14

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

304.71

147.72

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

2.37

1.39

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

1119.74

289.13

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

4.08

1.97

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance
Average IOPS of Last 400 Seconds - Higher is Better

25548.6

5313

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency
IOPS Divided By Standard Deviation - Higher is Better

42.08

6.44

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

2593.38

461.14

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

2155.3

488.93

Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

111