SSD 2015 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

SSD15 Product Benchmarks

View Single Product View Comparison

Bench Results

Samsung 850 Pro 512GB - Samsung MEX - Samsung 86Gbit MLC V-NAND

Samsung 950 Pro 512GB - Samsung UBX - Samsung 128Gbit MLC V-NAND

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

300

1201

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

377.45

1018.9

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

1141.1

200.9

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >100ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.1

0.01

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

1.34

0.15

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

13.65

13.2

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

370.69

860.67

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

657.87

132.7

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.16

0.04

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

1.61

1.82

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

436.16

1380

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

278.35

54.68

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.13

0.01

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

0.61

0.77

Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

250.61

301.76

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

2.23

3.92

Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

87.13

132.36

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

1.73

1.96

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

493.36

922.84

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

2.49

4.37

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

523.54

1533.4

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

3.02

4.19

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

167.9

220

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

1.93

2.83

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

319.28

767.99

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

2.42

3.66

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance
Average IOPS of Last 400 Seconds - Higher is Better

8146.18

7405.7

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency
IOPS Divided By Standard Deviation - Higher is Better

44.62

3.89

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

504.15

2199

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

488.04

1416.26

Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better