Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AnandTech Bench (beta)

For years we've generated hundreds upon thousands of benchmark results for every article we do. Most of these results are presented in the articles themselves and forgotten as soon as the next big thing launches, that changes today. We're going to start opening up our internal benchmark database to the public.

The first incarnation includes CPU performance data in SYSMark 2007 for nearly all current AMD and Intel CPUs. Over the coming weeks we will add results for all of our standard CPU benchmarks, if you have any requests please email us directly. Any technical problems, please email our webmaster.










Intel Core i5 750 - 2.66GHz - 1MB L2 - 8MB L3
vs. AMD Phenom II X4 955 - 3.2GHz - 2MB L2 - 6MB L3
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Overall
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    217
    195
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - E-Learning
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    190
    172
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Video Creation
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    243
    243
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Productivity
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    218
    187
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - 3D
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    221
    184
  • Hide me
    Adobe Photoshop CS4 - Retouch Artists Speed Test
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    18
    22
  • Hide me
    DivX 6.8.5 Encode (Xmpeg 5.0.3)
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    39
    44
  • Hide me
    x264 HD Encode Test - 1st pass - x264 0.59.819
    Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
    73
    74
  • Hide me
    x264 HD Encode Test - 2nd pass - x264 0.59.819
    Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
    21
    19
  • Hide me
    Windows Media Encoder 9 x64
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    30
    30
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc 3dsmax 8 CPU Test
    CPU Rendering Composite Score - Higher is Better
    13
    11
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Radiosity
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    13
    16
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Throne Shadowmap
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    9
    12
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - CBALLS2
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    5
    6
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SinglePipe2
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    19
    21
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Underwater
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    24
    29
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SpaceFlyby
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    28
    29
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - UnderwaterEscape
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    24
    30
  • Hide me
    Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark
    Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
    4238
    3675
  • Hide me
    Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark
    Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
    14142
    13242
  • Hide me
    POV-Ray 3.7 beta 23 - SMP Benchmark
    CPU Score in PPS - Higher is Better
    2710
    2542
  • Hide me
    Par2 - Multi-Threaded par2cmdline 0.4
    Time to Recover 57.2MB from 707.5MB Archive in Seconds - Lower is Better
    30
    36
  • Hide me
    Blender 2.48a Character Render
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    60
    72
  • Hide me
    Microsoft Excel 2007 SP1 - Monte Carlo Simulation
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    20
    25
  • Hide me
    Sony Vegas Pro 8 - Blu-ray Disc Image Creation (25Mbps MPEG-2)
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    206
    242
  • Hide me
    Sorenson Squeeze Pro 5 - Flash Video Creation
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    128
    143
  • Hide me
    WinRAR 3.8 Compression - 300MB Archive
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    96
    112
  • Hide me
    Fallout 3 - 1680 x 1050 - Medium Quality
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    86
    86
  • Hide me
    Left 4 Dead - 1680 x 1050 - Max Settings (No AA/AF/Vsync)
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    130
    121
  • Hide me
    Far Cry 2 - 1680 x 1050 - Playback (Action Scene) - Medium Quality
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    72
    51
  • Hide me
    Crysis Warhead - 1680 x 1050 - Mainstream Quality (Physics on Enthusiast) - assault bench
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    83
    81


Add Item
Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

NOAA Releases Wealth of Climate Change Data to Public
Blank
Catching the Buzz on the Facebook-Like Google Buzz
Blank
Job Losses Concern NASA Administrator
Blank
Texas Instruments WiLink 7.0 is Industry's First Quad-radio Chip
Blank
Boeing's Next-generation 747-800 Takes First Flight
Blank
2/9/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews -- Radeon HD 5570 Edition
Blank
Seagate Launching 600GB Server Drives With 2M Hour MTBF
Blank
Former Intel Exec Rajiv Goel Pleads Guilty in Insider Trading Case
Blank
NVIDIA Optimus Tech Makes Switching Between Internal Notebook GPUs Seamless
Blank
Native Americans Fighting to Stop MA Wind Farm, Locals Fight Farm in MI
Blank
Google Reduces ETF for Nexus, Unveils Phone Support Line
Blank
ATI Launches Radeon HD 5570, Continues to Drive DX11 Volume
Blank
Microsoft Claims Windows 7 Has No Battery Life Problems, Customers Say Otherwise
Blank
Ford Reveals All-electric 2011 Transit Connect with 80-Mile Range
Blank
Toyota Announces Global Recall of Prius, Lexus HS 250h Hybrids Over ABS Software
Blank
Boeing Spy Given 15-Year Prison Sentence
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Nexus One Reportedly Isn't Selling Well, But Linux Founder Loves It
Blank




pipeboost    Appro
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information