As financial week rolls along this week, today AMD announced their second quarter 2015 financial results. Earlier this month ahead of today’s announcement the company issued a warning for their Q2 earnings, significantly revising down their projections for revenue and gross margin. As a result of AMD’s earlier warning today’s announcement doesn’t have too many surprises in it, but it’s none the less an important and unfortunately painful quarter for AMD.

AMD Q2 2015 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $942M $1.03B $1.44B
Gross Margin 25% 32% 35%
Operating Income -$137M -$137M $63M
Net Income -$181M -$180M -$36M
Earnings Per Share -$0.23 -$0.23 -$0.05

For the quarter AMD recorded $942 million in revenue. This marks the first time in quite a number of years that AMD’s quarterly revenue has dipped below $1 billion, indicating the challenges the company has faced as the PC market continues to be soft and AMD CPU/APU sales have declined. All told the company’s revenue has dropped 8% compared to Q1, and on a year-over-year basis it has dropped 35%

Unsurprisingly given AMD’s low revenue, operating and net income for the quarter were both losses. On a GAAP basis operating income was a $137 million loss while the net loss was $181 million, both of which are virtually unchanged from AMD’s Q1’15 performance. Meanwhile on a non-GAAP basis the operating income loss was $87 million and the net loss $131 million, both of which were accelerated versus the last quarter. On a year-over-year basis both GAAP and non-GAAP show a significant increase in losses versus Q2’14.

AMD Q1 2015 Financial Results (Non-GAAP)
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $942M $1.03B $1.44B
Gross Margin 28% 32% 35%
Operating Income -$87M -$30M $88M
Net Income -$131M -$73M $38M
Earnings Per Share -$0.17 -$0.09 $0.05

Meanwhile AMD’s gross margin has taken a hit as well. The GAAP gross margin is just 25%, while the non-GAAP gross margin is slightly better at 28%, the difference being due to AMD's $33 million charge to move 20nm products to FinFET. Both metrics are well below the kind of 30-35% margins AMD wants to sustain in the long run.

In discussing their financial results for the quarter, AMD cited the soft PC market as the biggest factor pulling down the company’s performance. Historically in turn Q2 is typically the softest quarter for technology companies, however in AMD’s case it has been especially soft. With AMD’s single biggest product line being APU sales and with those sales weaker than expected, it has significantly impacted AMD’s bottom line.

Of particular note, AMD is stating that they believe the impending launch of Windows 10 was a significant factor in their weak sales for the quarter, as consumers held back on buying new systems until the new OS is out, and OEMs held back in releasing newer designs in order to align those releases with the new OS. This has particularly impacted Carrizo, AMD’s latest generation mobile APU, given that it was released only two months before the launch of Windows 10. AMD is expecting that mobile sales will rebound once Windows 10 launches, though as we’ve seen with the launch of Windows 8 in 2012, that isn’t necessarily a given.

AMD Q2 2015 Computing and Graphics
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $379M $532M $828M
Operating Income -$147M -$75M -$6M

Breaking down AMD’s revenue by business, soft APU sales pulled down the Computing and Graphics business overall, and led to Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom carrying a larger share of the company. Computing and Graphics revenue was down 29% over Q1’15 and a staggering 54% over Q2’14, primarily due to weak sales of notebook APUs, while graphics revenue was also down. Despite this the ASPs for both CPUs/APUs and GPUs were up on both a sequential and year-over-year basis, as while overall sales are lower, the prices of what AMD has sold has increased thanks to a richer product mix and the launch of the R9 300/Fury series at the tail end of the quarter.

AMD Q2 2015 Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $563M $498M $613M
Operating Income $27M $45M $97M

Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom on the other hand had a much stronger quarter, with revenue there increasing 13% sequentially, though year-over-year revenue was still down by 8%. As part of AMD’s long-term plans they are attempting shift more of their resources and revenue over to this business, so any kind of growth is welcome growth for the company. However for this quarter in particular AMD was not prepared for such a high ratio of revenue from this business group, with the lower margin of AMD’s semi-custom products dragging down the overall gross margin.

Finally, compounding AMD’s difficulties this quarter was the impact of their previously announced plan to move the rest of their in-development 20nm products to a newer FinFET node. This project resulted in a further $33 million hit to AMD’s books, driving up losses and decreasing gross margins. The good news for AMD is that this is a one-time charge, so they won’t have to pay for it again.

Looking forward, AMD’s projections for Q3 are that sales will pick up in both the Computing and Graphics business and the Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom business. AMD is expecting improved PC sales as a result of Windows 10 and Carrizo reaching the market – in particular shoring up the company’s poor notebook sales – while orders for semi-custom processors for the game consoles will pick up in order to build up inventory for Christmas. AMD expects overall revenue to be up 6% (+/- 3%) sequentially, though the non-GAAP gross margin is expected to come in at just 29%, which is below where AMD would like to be and means there’s a good chance AMD will be in the red again for Q3.

Longer term, the company is still working on bringing their expenses under control and better aligning them with revenue, a task that becomes harder after quarters like these, with AMD admitting that the profitability timeline for the company has been pushed out. As it stands AMD still has over $800 million in cash and equivalents on-hand, however the company has also mentioned that restructuring to further cut expenses is not off the table, and that the company is assessing the option.

Source: AMD Investor Relations

Comments Locked

125 Comments

View All Comments

  • Nagorak - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Why bother? It's going to be the same story as the last few years, ~5-10% improvement in IPC and stagnant or even declining frequency. It's not going to light the world on fire.
  • yannigr2 - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    They just try to survive until Zen. If Zen comes and it comes with much better IPC and efficiency compared to today AMD hardware, they might have a chance. Of course even if Zen is 200% faster than Intel Skylake(just exaggerating here), Intel will use it's marketing dollars to keep AMD out of many OEM laptops and desktops. Anyway if Zen comes and it is competitive with Intel on IPC, then AMD will have a better chance in the retail market. People will start looking again for AMD cpus and motherboards, integrated graphics will get a significant boost thanks to the better CPU in the APUS, everything in AMD's line will be much better and much more competitive. The fact that Intel is slowing down with fabrication process, is also good news for AMD. Skylake wouldn't offer that much more compared to Haswell.

    @Anandtech. There much be Carrizo laptops by now, somewhere. I don't think Intel managed to stop every Carrizo laptop from reaching the retail market. Is there a chance we will see a review?
  • Shadow7037932 - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Do you really think Zen will be significantly better given that AMD doesn't exactly have the biggest R&D budget esp. with their financial troubles?
  • D. Lister - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Intel (or Nvidia, for that matter) would want AMD around, to make them look much better, though. Because without AMD, intel would have to compete against its own products to make new sales, and that would be a much tougher competetion.
  • melgross - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    When you compare the size of the companies, and remove ATI from AMD's sales, since Intel doesn't make discreet GPUs, you can easily see that Intel has been competing against themselves for years. AMD isn't really a factor since Intel changed course and came out with Yonah. And that was a long time ago.
  • yeeeeman - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    This is bad, really. And it is a reflection of what they do or shall I say, what they don't do. Really, this is the whole reason of why they don't get the attention they deserve. They have good products but they need to risk more, to cooperate with OEMs to get more design wins. They had that cool Discovery platform that really what a Bay Trail killer. Where are products like that released by OEMs? Why would you work on a project like Puma+ with products like Mullins and Beema if you stop at the most important part, selling the damn products. Ok, they don't have the best tech out there, but neither rockchip or allwinner or mediatek but they've suceeded. They released products which give them a lot of revenue to keep going. Damn, I really believe that there is no really visionary person in AMD, like Jerry Sanders or Hector Ruiz. And don't tell me about Lisa, because she ain't got it.
    So dear AMD. Release products, be creative. It doesn't matter if you have the slowest CPU in the market, it matters how you dress it. If you release quality products that can differentiate from the others at reasonable prices, you can sell big. Take cues from Apple, from Intel, from nVidia. Be smart and curageous.
  • melgross - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    With chips, it's just performance that matters. Price is less of an issue for major markets.

    Finished products are very different AMD is competing in the former, not the latter. And their chips just haven't measured up.
  • Achaios - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    This is sad.

    AMD gets pushed off the market slowly but steadily. The way things are going, I don't see AMD having much of a future.
  • ASEdouardD - Monday, July 20, 2015 - link

    This would be a major problem. We can't have a monopoly in two key segments of the pc business: cpus (Intel) and graphics cards (Nvidia).
  • huaxshin - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Time for this company to die or someone that knows how to run a business takes over.
    AMD have proved year after year that they are incapable of keeping up with Intel and with graphic processors they are falling further behind Nvidia. I bet Nvidia will beat them to launch the Pascal cards months before AMD get 400 series out.
    With Maxwell they were 1.5 year ahead of AMD before they got out efficient cards that match Maxwell in efficiency. Even with that the Fury cards isnt even a new architecture so Nvidia is ahead here as well.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now