Final Words

ASUS has crafted an elegant experience with the UX305. The body is a sleek creation of aluminum, the device is very thin, and at 1.2 kg (2.6 lbs) in weight, it is very portable. The UX305 could easily be mistaken for a device which costs far more than its $699 starting price. When one thinks of the mid-range laptop, one would expect a thick, heavy, and boring device with a TN display panel, a spinning hard drive, and a short battery life. ASUS has thrown all of this on its head.

The Core M processor in the UX305 which we received was the 5Y10 model. For now, the higher spec 5Y71 model will not be coming to North America in this device. However the performance was surprisingly good. In shorter, burst workloads, the 5Y10 struggled to compete against 5Y71 with its much higher boost clock speed, nor could it compete against Broadwell-U based devices with their 15 watt thermal envelope. However on sustained workloads, due to the cooling solution and higher surface temperatures that ASUS has allowed, the UX305 performed much better than the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro. Gaming was a big difference on this device, and while it is certainly not going to be the next Crysis killer, for lower demanding games like DOTA 2, it performed very well even over long periods of time.

The amount of components which lead to a better overall computing experience that ASUS packed into the UX305 is very impressive. At just $699, you still get 8 GB of RAM, and a 256 GB solid state drive. This is unheard of at this price point. The Dell XPS 13, for example, starts at $799 with just 4 GB of memory and a 128 GB drive.

The keyboard and trackpad are both quite good, especially when we consider the price, and the thin profile of the UX305. The keys had good travel, and while I would question the layout of having the power key as part of the keyboard, really the only thing missing from the keyboard experience is a backlight, and perhaps I only expect a backlight because the UX305 feels much more expensive than it is. The trackpad served me very well, and is quite large. ASUS has had some issues in the past with trackpad drivers, but I experienced no issues at all during my time with the device.

Battery life, while not class leading, is still very good, and bests any laptop we tested before 2015 with the exception of the MacBook Air under OS X. Even under a heavy load, the Core M kept its composure and ensured that the battery life did not slip away too quickly.

There are of course a few issues which need to be mentioned. The already mentioned keyboard backlight would be a great addition to the lineup, even if it was just on a higher priced model. I really do not like the display hinge which is crafed to lift the rear of the laptop up when the display is opened. It makes the laptop much more unstable, causes the display “legs” to dig into soft materials like a wooden table, and all of this is for an extra millimeter or two of height. ASUS would have been much better off with slightly thicker feet.

The display is both good and bad, but it has to be counterbalanced against the price point of this device. It is an IPS display, which is excellent to see even in a more budget offering, and it has excellent brightness and contrast levels. The matte coating is also something that many people prefer to knock the glare down. It performed very poorly in our accuracy tests though, and while that can also be attributed to the cost of the device, the post-calibration numbers on this display were fantastic. If only ASUS could take the effort to include an icc profile to help it out.

Overall, even with the knocks against it, this is a heck of a device for just $699. A Core M processor, which allows a fanless and therefore silent device, but still offers good performance, and much more performance than any other CPU which would allow for a fanless design. 8 GB of memory standard. A 256 GB solid state drive standard. A 1920x1080p IPS display, once again standard. ASUS has really raised the bar for what someone can expect in a mid-range device.

Battery Life, Wi-Fi, and Speakers
Comments Locked

164 Comments

View All Comments

  • darkich - Friday, March 27, 2015 - link

    ..as for "thoroughly trashing" in CPU(or should i say, in software-dependent web benchmarks only), well just wait for the 14nm Cyclone and Cortex A72.
    By year's end we will see ARM CPU beating core m even on 2.5w TDP and $50 worth of chips
  • Morawka - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    See this is how you treat your customers.

    This Asus Laptop does not have a Ethernet Port since it's so thin, but GOOD guy asus includes a ethernet adapter in the box.

    THen you turn around and look at apple's offering. 1 port, Twice as expensive, and requires you to buy a $80 adapter right after shelling out $1300 + Tax.

    With the Asus laptop, you can avoid sales tax easily.
    with the apple laptop, you can't.. They got sales tax everywhere because of apple stores in every state. Your only hope is mac mall and they lag behind several months on new models.
  • DavidTJ - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    Exactly what model is reviewed?
    I have looked at UX305FA-FB003P and it's totally different. Also UX305FA-FC008H looks different (4GB only)...
  • Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    Can you add a DOTA 2 battery life test? Also, why does the XPS 13 do sooooo much better in the normalized battery life test?
  • kyuu - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    It doesn't do *that* much better (well, I guess it does when you consider the XPS 13 uses a higher wattage CPU). But Dell worked closely with Intel and Microsoft to squeeze every little bit of power savings they could out of the hardware/software package, so I imagine that's responsible for the difference.
  • heytimbo - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    I tried one of the first gen UX31. If I recall, it was a 128GB SSD and so full of bloatware about 30 GB were free. I took it back to the retailer and questioned. I was told to buy a standalone copy of windows and install. It seemed easier to return the PC and go Mac. I have not looked back. ASUS, you make great products but are you still filling the laptops with bloatware?
  • Dorek - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    "If I recall, it was a 128GB SSD and so full of bloatware about 30 GB were free."

    I don't believe you. The OS takes about 10-20 GB, so that's roughly 100GB left. You're saying 70 GIGABYTES were taken up by crapware? That's bullshit. That'd be like, 20 installs of Adobe Premiere Pro, or two installs of a high-end AAA 2014 game. You're lying.
  • heytimbo - Friday, March 27, 2015 - link

    No, and that is why I returned the PC. I could not believe the level of bloatware. I am curious about these current machines. If I see any at a local store I may test to see.
  • beehofer - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    No back-lit Keyboard was the deal-breaker for me. I would have been very interested but I work/play in dark settings often and cannot go back to a non back-lit keyboard. It was a gross mistake by Asus. Get with it man!
  • creed3020 - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    I don't know where that $699 price is coming from. Amazon US is showing around $899 and in Canada the cost is $1200. So this "budget" ultrabook just went through the roof in pricing.

    I'm thoroughly impressed by it but this is MacBook pricing...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now