ATTO - Transfer Size vs Performance

I'm keeping our ATTO test around because it's a tool that can easily be run by anyone and it provides a quick look into performance scaling across multiple transfer sizes. I'm providing the results in a slightly different format because the line graphs didn't work well with multiple drives and creating the graphs was rather painful since the results had to be manually inserted cell be cell as ATTO doesn't provide a 'save as CSV' functionality.

OCZ Vector 180 240GB

Vector 180's performance across different IO sizes doesn't scale as smoothly as on some other drives and especially the read performance has room for improvement.

AS-SSD Incompressible Sequential Performance

I'm also keeping AS-SSD around as it's freeware like ATTO and can be used by our readers to confirm that their drives operate properly. AS-SSD uses incompressible data for all of its transfers, so it's also a valuable tool when testing SandForce based drives that perform worse with incompressible data.

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance

 

Mixed Read/Write Performance Idle Power Consumption & TRIM Validation
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • KAlmquist - Tuesday, March 24, 2015 - link

    Vector 180 vx. MX 100:

    I think that the Crucial MX 100 will be a bit faster than the Vector 180 under typical usage, though the Vector 180 does outperform the MX 100 on some benchmarks. Both drives have partial power loss protection. The Vector 180 has a 5 year warranty vs. the 3 year warranty on the MX 100, but a lot of people will be looking to upgrade from SATA to PCIe SSD's before the 3 year warranty expires. In short, I don't see any reason to pay a premium price for the Vector 180.
  • MrCommunistGen - Tuesday, March 24, 2015 - link

    If only HIPM+DIPM worked (yes I know its a hardware limitation of the platform) this looks like it'd be a great laptop SSD due to such low power consumption in the various workloads measured here.
  • djsvetljo - Tuesday, March 24, 2015 - link

    Two dead OCZ drives - there will never be a 3rd one. One of the drives was from the era of the bitcoins boom ( when they were easy to mine). Lost 150 coins there ( that's over $50 000). They stupid thing locked up due to power issues ( too many power cycles).

    STAY AWAY FROM OCZ
  • Antronman - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    Well the thing is, the internals are drastically different right now.

    I've been in the market for a good SSD for a while. These drives seem to perform well. Sadly outperformed by the 850 Pro drives, but I do think that the enclosure is actually very aesthetically pleasing. If the cost could be driven down a lot, I'd be very interested in the 180.
  • mapesdhs - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    You're right, they need to have a price advantage with the 180 to pull people in. Also,
    availability needs to be good - in the past it's been rather sketchy with the 150, which
    means prices tend to creep up from a small number of suppliers.

    Ian.
  • mapesdhs - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    More than 30 OCZ drives, all working fine. Some had bad luck, others used Marvell ports
    and blame OCZ. It varies.

    As for coins, well boohoo, not real money unless they're converted back to $.

    Ian.
  • ocztosh - Monday, March 30, 2015 - link

    Hi mapesdhs, thank you for your feedback and great to hear the drives are working well for you. We greatly appreciate both your business and support.
  • FalcomPSX - Tuesday, March 24, 2015 - link

    I've owned i think three OCZ drives in the past, they've all bricked on me within about a year. Never again will I purchase their shoddy products. While i was able to get warranty replacments each time, and the customer service is decent, the product itself is just not reliable in any way. I don't know if the new ones are improved at all, but i'm not risking MY data to find out.
  • ocztosh - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    Hello FalcomPSX, thank you for your comments and sorry to hear that you has a problem with previous drives. We are a new organization under Toshiba and have made significant changes to everything from processes to production. We understand how you feel and hope that one day we will have the opportunity to demonstrate the reliability of our current products. Thank you again for your feedback
  • NeatOman - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    Battery backup should be built into the PSU for workstations and servers, google does this for their data centers.. why shouldn't servers and workstations. All you need is 1 minute for the average workstation to go into hibernation until power is back on IMO.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now