CPU Benchmarks

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, memory subtimings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

For reference the ASUS TUF Z97 Mark S in our setup, with BIOS 2102, did implement a form of MultiCore Turbo.

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

 

Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01

Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link

Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. The principle today is still the same, primarily as an output for H.264 + AAC/MP3 audio within an MKV container. In our test we use the same videos as in the Xilisoft test, and results are given in frames per second.

HandBrake v0.9.9 Film CPU Only

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K CPU Only

Rendering – PovRay 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision RayTracer, or PovRay, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.

PovRay 3.7 beta

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-Zip MIPS

System Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ammohunt - Friday, November 14, 2014 - link

    Silly design. More impossible places to clean the dust out of.
  • SkyBill40 - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Spending ~ $300 on a motherboard alone seems pretty ridiculous to me and that doesn't even speak for the highly gimmicky plastic that covers everything.

    As has been said, to each their own.
  • snarfies - Tuesday, December 2, 2014 - link

    I asked Asus quite a long time ago if there would be an X99 version - they said "no." So Asus blew it on this one, I went with another board by another manufacturer entirely. Shame, I had a white case all picked out and everything.
  • kelendar - Friday, February 27, 2015 - link

    I'm not sure about all that hate for this board. Ask any manufacturer if they will doa white PCB mobo. Go ahead. They will say 'NO'. White PCB based products are much more expensive to manufacture so they don't do it. Now if the gamer asked for it instead of black then they would swap. But then, black would be Limited Edition and cost an arm and a leg:-)

    The armor part is nicer than you think. I don't feel like I'm about to bend my PCI slots running a couple of heavy video cards and a cooling loop with 1/2 ID 3/4 OD lines. This mobo feels like it could handle 20 lbs of gear. If $150 is too much money, you need a better job:-) Gaming is not for the faint of heart.
  • kelendar - Friday, February 27, 2015 - link

    I meant $150 more than the budget boards.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now