ASUS TUF Z97 Mark S Conclusion

To end with a cliché: beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For those that like a clean white camouflage design, it is easy to be seduced by the Z97 Mark S. After the positive responses ASUS received after showing a preview at Computex, it was almost a no-brainer release for them. This was something their following requested, and in my opinion it has been implemented well. There definitely feels like an attention to detail, even if the detractors might call it a paint-job over a TUF Mark 1.

Putting aesthetics to the side and looking at the motherboard pragmatically, it offers a few controllers over the base Z97 implementation, such as extra SATA ports and extra USB ports both from ASMedia controllers. Networking is provided by Intel I218-V and Realtek 8111GR controllers, with the bundled TurboLAN software allowing for packet prioritization. Audio comes in the form of an adjusted Realtek ALC1150 setup with PCB separation and filter caps, and PCIe layouts support x8/x8 multi-GPU gaming configurations.

The motherboard comes with Thermal Armor pre-attached, giving the white PCB of the motherboard a cleaner look, and in the box are a number of slot protectors and port defenders to reduce dust or corrosion. TUF branded motherboards are designed for their longer five year warranty, and while these might help extend that, they are not a condition for the warranty. ASUS instead offers air baffles for directional airflow and fan management software to help the situation as well as implementing components with a longer life span.

In terms of benchmarks, the Z97 Mark S comes out very well. Idle power consumption was a little high, but load power consumption was average and POST times were a reasonable 11 seconds. The Z97 Mark S takes the record for the best DPC Latency we have ever seen on a motherboard (an award it shares with the Maximus VII Impact we are currently testing), and also has very good audio scores. Due to its use of MultiCore Turbo, it also scores highly in our CPU tests.

The BIOS and software situation for ASUS products is ever evolving. While the package is missing some minor tweaks I would like to see, both the software and BIOS are more well-rounded than others and offer good tools in general. TUF motherboards have very good fan control systems, attempting to tune for power and noise, and I am pleased to see RPM/Temperature graphs in the mix as well. There is a lack of OC options in the OS software, and no one-touch button for overclocking, despite the Z97 chipset being used which might deter users who have never fiddled in a BIOS before.

Pricing of the ASUS Z97 Mark S has yet to be announced, but we assume it to be in the $260-$300 region alongside the other Z97 TUF motherboards. At $300 it might be a bit of a stretch price, even for a limited edition motherboard, but at $260-$275 it makes more sense.

It is very rare we get a chance to review the first production motherboard from a limited edition line but the Z97 Mark S performed solid from the start. For anyone wanting to show off a white motherboard build, the buck starts at the Mark S with a few white LEDs. Even if a user keeps it in a closed case for private viewings, the fact that it is a TUF range product is a big plus.

All ASUS needs to do now is create a TUF line of GPUs, and a limited edition white one, and put the two together. Failing that, I expect to see the Galaxy booth at CES to pair a Mark S with their white HOF cards. At Computex ASUS showed off an example build with one of their pre-release units:

 

Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pontius Dilate - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    I really would have liked to see pictures of the board with the armor removed. The white PCB sounds like it could be interesting by itself.
  • xthetenth - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Yeah, I'd be really interested in how it looks with just the white board, especially since it seems the thermal armor is removable. I think that'd look extra cool in a white case.
  • futurepastnow - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Cheap, stupid looking plastic and cheap, stupid looking fans, neither of which serve any purpose. Looks like a winner.
  • JaredNihilist - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Have the Z77 Sabertooth. Board fans still working fine and don't notice any extra noise from them. Albeit, I don't notice any benefit from them either, heat-wise - I'm sure they've stopped their fair share of dust.

    I didn't mind paying the extra for appearance though, I liked that it hid the rest of the board. I found the build the same as others, armour didn't impede anything. Once I upgrade though, shall definitely be removing the armour to customise its look - too scared to do it at the moment as my mainstay PC.
  • mexell - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    What a colossal waste of money. However, to each his (or her) own, I suppose.
  • nekoken - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    I'm pretty dubious about the thermal armor, and its efficacy. I have the Sabertooth 55i and Sabertooth 990FX motherboards and have been quite happy with them. They work quite well in a wide temperature range without that plastic wrap.

    I'm more than dubious about a modern motherboard that has two different on motherboard fans. I don't ever plan on owning another system that needs an active cooling solution for the stuff built into the motherboard (other than SoC systems.)
  • xthetenth - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Is there any word on whether they'll release one without the thermal armor?
  • Miqunator - Tuesday, November 11, 2014 - link

    There is the Z97 mark 2 board that doesn't have the armor, haven't bothered to compare the other features so not sure if you lose something else too.
  • xthetenth - Tuesday, November 11, 2014 - link

    I'm hoping they'll do something like the mark 2 with the S coloring, because a white PCB looks super cool and they're promising it'll actually stay white. IIRC the 2 only misses out on an ethernet port and a significant fraction of the cost.
  • CrazyElf - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    The back might be worth something. It it will serve as a function similar to those GPU backplates, preventing warping from heavy CPU coolers and perhaps triple slot GPUs as well. Gimmicky, but potentially useful in that regard.

    As far as the front side, it's mostly pointless and maybe harmful (ex: the components may be cooler with the cover off). Dust I suppose, but if you have a DataVac, then this is pointless too. The only protection it might offer is if your screwdriver slips. It also will make removing GPUs a bit of a pain.

    The rest of the board I think is underwhelming for the price. At $300, I expect very high end VRMs and a PLX chip.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now