Power Consumption

Currently the S10 controller doesn't support slumber or DevSleep power modes, which is why the idle power consumption turns out to be high compared to the competition. Phison told me that the slumber power (HIPM+DIPM) implementation is nearly complete and a new firmware should follow in about a month, but in the meantime the S10 and Neutron XT aren't really suitable for mobile use. The load power consumption is more moderate, although there are more efficient drives and controller solutions on the market.

SSD Slumber Power (HIPM+DIPM) - 5V Rail

Drive Power Consumption - Sequential Write

Drive Power Consumption - Random Write

Performance vs. Transfer Size Final Words
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • hojnikb - Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - link

    So pretty much, we're gonna have to wait another year or so to get 3D nand products (ie. mx200).
  • Chrispy_ - Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - link

    Corsair *knows* you're going to test steady state.

    If the drive isn't good at steady state, why risk mass exposure with a bad review when a simple firmware update could make a big difference?

    First impressions matter, and the Neutron XT is now an underwhelming drive unlikely to be able to compete with the MX100s on price.
  • ol1bit - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    I'm on my 3rd SSD.
    1st was Intel 74GB (first one would lock up, got Intel to replace it then was good).

    2nd was Corsair Force Series GT CSSD-F120GBGT-BK, and if my system got to busy, SSD would lock up HD light on solid, hard reset required, tried new drivers, everything and honestly I gave up on this drive, never fixed.

    3rd is Samsung 840 pro 250GB Uber fast, no lockups ever. I'm sticking with them for the foreseeable future!
  • zmeul - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    any word on pricing?
  • dj christian - Thursday, November 20, 2014 - link

    On the Performance Consistency page.

    "Each of the three graphs has its own purpose. The first one is of the whole duration of the test in log scale. The second and third one zoom into the beginning of steady-state operation (t=1400s) but on different scales: the second one uses log scale for easy comparison whereas the third one uses linear scale for better visualization of differences between drives. Click the dropdown selections below each graph to switch the source data."

    Which third one? All show log data and the last one doesn't show linear data.
  • editorsorgtfo - Saturday, November 22, 2014 - link

    My A10-7850K / G.1 Sniper A88X build-in-progress is perfect for an M.2 (NGFF) SSD on a PCIe 2.0 x4 adapter card. The mobo's single PCIe 3.0 x16 slot is ripe for a Radeon R7 250, for Dual Graphics use, and its other x16 slot is PCIe 2.0, running at x4, ready for a bootable SSD to be installed.

    As for adapters, a Bplus M2P4A, a Lycom DT-120, or a (not-yet-released) ASUS Hyper M.2 X4 would fit the bill nicely.

    The LSI SandForce SF3739-controlled cards, such as the ADATA that was shown at Computex 2013 and the Kingston seen at Storage Visions 2014 back in January, or the Kingston HyperX using the Marvell 88SS9293 Altaplus PCIe 2.0 x4 SSD Controller displayed at Computex 2014, or Phison's, or Hynix's controller-in-the-works, etc. have yet to be released to the retail market. Don't they know the world's enthusiasts are just itching to spend their dosh on those gems?!

    Kingston trotted out their native PCIe expansion-slot HyperX "Predator" unit at the 2014 CES show in January, with a SF3739 controller. That's actually the unit I want! So, it's "hurry up and wait" at my house! LOL

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now