Gaming Benchmarks

F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs is a benchmarking wet dream – a highly complex benchmark that can bring the toughest setup and high resolutions down into single figures. Having an extreme SSAO setting can do that, but at the right settings Sleeping Dogs is highly playable and enjoyable. We run the basic benchmark program laid out in the Adrenaline benchmark tool, and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Battlefield 4

The EA/DICE series that has taken countless hours of my life away is back for another iteration, using the Frostbite 3 engine. AMD is also piling its resources into BF4 with the new Mantle API for developers, designed to cut the time required for the CPU to dispatch commands to the graphical sub-system. For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures. We test at 1920x1080 at Ultra settings.

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


CPU Benchmarks Conclusion
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • poohbear - Friday, October 3, 2014 - link

    Oh and if ure looking for auto overclocking, this mobo is as good as it gets! Very simple & straight forward with very little hassle & ure at 4.6ghz.
  • zent - Friday, October 3, 2014 - link

    You don't have to install that molex, I'm running MGPU just fine without it.
  • The_Assimilator - Friday, October 3, 2014 - link

    If Asrock had gone with standard Intel GbE instead of the crappy "Killer" ethernet, and ignored Thunderbolt (TB on an overclocking board, seriously?), they would've easily been able to get this board under the $200 mark. Maybe that would've also allowed them to use 4-pin fan headers for the whole board. All in all, a missed opportunity.
  • gammaray - Friday, October 3, 2014 - link

    Always wondered why they put 4 slots for video cards, i mean, how many people put 4 VCs in their rigs??
  • The_Assimilator - Saturday, October 4, 2014 - link

    I'm guessing the same people who buy "overclocking" boards.
  • gammaray - Saturday, October 4, 2014 - link

    hmm, no, i always buy OC boards, but only use 1 video card.
  • Shiitaki - Saturday, October 4, 2014 - link

    The comments are more interesting than the motherboard review. iGP display port connector, really? LoL 4 vs 3 ping fan headers? Not enough USB ports? And there is a difficult to get to molex if you have a small case? Complaining about the TB header?

    This board is an oddity because if I was going to run a lot of hardware, why would I use a 1150 cpu? And for the AMD fan boys, Intel crushes AMD, not sure why AMD is included in any of the benchmarks, since this is theoretically aimed at the performance market. Seems a socket 2011 would be better. I think the reason this board will be bought is because it looks good in a windowed case. It's geek jewelry.

    My only complaint is PS/2 ports, really? Seriously? PS/2 ports? At least the printer and serial ports have finally been deprecated.
  • zent - Saturday, October 4, 2014 - link

    Do you own a mechanical keyboard? My QPAD (bought in 2014, not 1999) is native PS/2.
  • Kanuj5678 - Sunday, October 5, 2014 - link

    i have been using the Z77 extreme 6 mother board it is a good board but have minor issues with USB ports and sound output at times
  • redwolfe98 - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    i love the yellow and black color scheme..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now