The Metal Frame & External Antenna with Dynamic Tuning

While I’ve discussed material choices before in the context of mobile devices, the new Moto X requires a new depth of understanding in order to really appreciate the amount of work Motorola has done to enable the industrial and material design desired. In order to avoid issues with the metal frame detuning internal antennas and maintain radio performance, Motorola has developed their own custom antenna tuner that is supposed to be even better than the QFE15xx antenna tuner that Qualcomm has made as a part of their RF360 package.

Of course, at this point the iPhone 4’s “death grip” issue has been discussed to death. In short, due to a lack of antenna diversity, it was possible to easily detune the phone’s antenna and significantly decrease signal reception by putting a finger on the gap between two parts of the metal frame. Understanding how an antenna tuner can help to resolve this situation requires an understanding of impedance and how it relates to antennas.

The first and inevitable question is what impedance is. To briefly summarize this topic, impedance is essentially resistance in an AC circuit. Impedance in an AC (alternating current, or what comes out of most power outlets) is determined by resistors, capacitors, and inductors present in the circuit. In antennas, what’s really happening is that electromagnetic waves in the air are causing the antenna to resonate, and as a result the waves are converted in electrical signals. While this is easy enough to understand, the crucial portion of this is where the antenna connects to the rest of the system. Antennas inherently have an impedance determined by natural resonant frequencies, the height above the ground, and the conductors used to construct the antenna. For the most part though, this is relatively easy to tune for at the factory such that the impedance mismatch is small.

The major problem is that the real world is not just the inside of a factory. As mentioned before, the hand detunes the antenna due to its capacitive effects. This means that the impedance changes. For those still following along with the physics, the reason why an impedance mismatch causes reception to worsen is because the electrical signal is still in the form of a wave in the AC circuit, parts of the wave will reflect just like how some light is reflected when crossing from one medium to another, which is why water can appear to be a mirror from one side but a window from another.

Now that we’ve gone over the physics, let’s get back to the Moto X. Motorola has developed their own custom antenna tuner. While Qualcomm has their own antenna tuner, the major differentiator is that this antenna tuner actually detects capacitance changes at the antenna and adjusts impedance accordingly. In practice, the antenna is retuned incredibly quickly, with next to no hesitation. Motorola demonstrated this by showing two Moto Xs that were identical except one had the antenna tuner disabled. The Moto X without this antenna tuner rapidly dropped from ~23 dBm output power to ~7 dBm output power. The unit with the antenna tuner managed to achieve around ~15 dBm output power after detuning. Remember, decibels are a logarithmic scale so this represents around a 6.3x increase in power output.

In addition, in discussions with Motorola’s engineering team they claimed that the new Moto X improves upon the receive sensitivity of the first Moto X. This is no small feat as the original Moto X was known to have some of the best radio reception amongst its peers. Once again, this makes sense as even though polycarbonate is RF transparent there will always be some level of reflection, just like how there is reflection with impedance mismatches, and I would once again refer to our article on materials in mobile devices to get a better understanding of this subject.

Introduction & The New Moto X Moto Voice, Display, Actions, Attentive Display, Sound, Camera, and Final Words
Comments Locked

108 Comments

View All Comments

  • rocketbuddha - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    It the Apple and HTC effect.

    Worse! With most US Carriers, pushing users to tiered data plans and with the latest leak from the iCloud of private/nude fotos of Hollywood celebrities, I cannot imagine the dimwits who swear by the "Cloud" over uSD, are serious, especially the ones who pooh!pooh! uSD over the cloud.

    And removable battery makes it easier for end users to replace when they go bad. A basic 101 that any company that wants to reduce calls to its replacement center can hop on. It is a crime that they saddle non-removable battery of <2500 mA for a phone of this size.
    Add to it the repairability of phones with removable batteries is generally far above with the non-removable ones.
  • steven75 - Monday, September 8, 2014 - link

    MicroSD memory is the slowest and least reliable flash storage type. Anandtech has already covered this fact.

    The thing that kills it is the public does NOT want to manage files among two volumes. Sure some ultra geek types do, but 99.9% of everyone else does not. People want ease of use over everything else, and I mean everything. Look how many people spend $150 on a single cup coffee maker that is beaten in quality by a $25 Aeropress. The public ain't care, son!
  • erikiksaz - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link

    Unless you've got Xray vision, the first thing you notice about a smartphone is how it feels in your hand. Why wouldn't they start with aesthetics?
  • fswc - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Thank you for posting about radio recepiton. This is becoming a big thing for me when picking a new phone out.
  • julianocas - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    What a great "mini-review", far more relevant information than almost every other "full-review" among internet.

    BTW, at the chart, Moto X also have nano sim.

    Thanks
  • zir - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    I believe in Motorola. Going bye bye with my OG Moto X, gonna get me one of these bad boys.
  • MrVeedo - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    my moto x has been awesome, have had it since release. but I wish they would have stayed with the same size screen, 5.2 is just a pain in the arse and too big in my opinion.
  • JoricK - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    I'm wondering, if you have a choice between keeping your old gen Moto X and buying the new one. What would you do?

    I've been waiting for this phone but the size of the display seems to big for my use, so for me it's either buying the generation 1 or the new one.
  • Blairh - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    1st gen Moto X is 130 grams. Not 139 grams.
  • dragonsqrrl - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Oh no, that battery... what were they thinking? I guess they're not expecting people to use that display very much, you know, to interact with the device.

    Love to see those front facing stereo speakers, and they accomplished it while maintaining a very thin bezel. That's really been my only gripe with front facing speakers thus far, they tend to increase bezel and device size.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now