The Metal Frame & External Antenna with Dynamic Tuning

While I’ve discussed material choices before in the context of mobile devices, the new Moto X requires a new depth of understanding in order to really appreciate the amount of work Motorola has done to enable the industrial and material design desired. In order to avoid issues with the metal frame detuning internal antennas and maintain radio performance, Motorola has developed their own custom antenna tuner that is supposed to be even better than the QFE15xx antenna tuner that Qualcomm has made as a part of their RF360 package.

Of course, at this point the iPhone 4’s “death grip” issue has been discussed to death. In short, due to a lack of antenna diversity, it was possible to easily detune the phone’s antenna and significantly decrease signal reception by putting a finger on the gap between two parts of the metal frame. Understanding how an antenna tuner can help to resolve this situation requires an understanding of impedance and how it relates to antennas.

The first and inevitable question is what impedance is. To briefly summarize this topic, impedance is essentially resistance in an AC circuit. Impedance in an AC (alternating current, or what comes out of most power outlets) is determined by resistors, capacitors, and inductors present in the circuit. In antennas, what’s really happening is that electromagnetic waves in the air are causing the antenna to resonate, and as a result the waves are converted in electrical signals. While this is easy enough to understand, the crucial portion of this is where the antenna connects to the rest of the system. Antennas inherently have an impedance determined by natural resonant frequencies, the height above the ground, and the conductors used to construct the antenna. For the most part though, this is relatively easy to tune for at the factory such that the impedance mismatch is small.

The major problem is that the real world is not just the inside of a factory. As mentioned before, the hand detunes the antenna due to its capacitive effects. This means that the impedance changes. For those still following along with the physics, the reason why an impedance mismatch causes reception to worsen is because the electrical signal is still in the form of a wave in the AC circuit, parts of the wave will reflect just like how some light is reflected when crossing from one medium to another, which is why water can appear to be a mirror from one side but a window from another.

Now that we’ve gone over the physics, let’s get back to the Moto X. Motorola has developed their own custom antenna tuner. While Qualcomm has their own antenna tuner, the major differentiator is that this antenna tuner actually detects capacitance changes at the antenna and adjusts impedance accordingly. In practice, the antenna is retuned incredibly quickly, with next to no hesitation. Motorola demonstrated this by showing two Moto Xs that were identical except one had the antenna tuner disabled. The Moto X without this antenna tuner rapidly dropped from ~23 dBm output power to ~7 dBm output power. The unit with the antenna tuner managed to achieve around ~15 dBm output power after detuning. Remember, decibels are a logarithmic scale so this represents around a 6.3x increase in power output.

In addition, in discussions with Motorola’s engineering team they claimed that the new Moto X improves upon the receive sensitivity of the first Moto X. This is no small feat as the original Moto X was known to have some of the best radio reception amongst its peers. Once again, this makes sense as even though polycarbonate is RF transparent there will always be some level of reflection, just like how there is reflection with impedance mismatches, and I would once again refer to our article on materials in mobile devices to get a better understanding of this subject.

Introduction & The New Moto X Moto Voice, Display, Actions, Attentive Display, Sound, Camera, and Final Words
Comments Locked

108 Comments

View All Comments

  • brianc400 - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Correction: Motorola Mobility is still owned by Google. The sale to Lenovo has not closed yet. "Expected by year end."
  • StormyParis - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Darn. If only they made a phablet version of that.
  • techmaniac - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    <Sigh> still no microSD card slot. Looks like I'll have to pass on this one as well.
  • thejesse - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    "While Motorola has been acquired by Lenovo, it’s clear that the Motorola I saw today is still very much the same Motorola from the Google era."
    While Lenovo has agreed to acquire Motorola that acquisition has NOT taken place. This is still "the Google era."
  • lscarval - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Correction: the original Moto X also uses a Nano SIM.
  • Arbie - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    @techmaniac - ditto that on the lack of micro-SD. No interest here either.

    Also, I'm amazed that people think a metal phone is "better" when it so obviously makes the basic function (send & receive radio signals) less robust. Why would anyone favor a device that has to jump through *major* technological hoops just to get even with a simpler design? And, why doesn't AT point this out?

    But then, I also wonder why the first half of every AT phone article is about look & feel. To me these are almost insignificant compared to reliability, storage, battery life (and replacement) etc.

    Perhaps I should just be glad that among our leading concerns now is feeling the lip when you swipe your phone screen. Nirvana is imminent.

    Sorry to be snarky... you guys try hard, but I think you lose focus sometimes and can't see the forest for the gimmicks & gloss.
  • jeffkibuule - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Because when spending hundreds of dollars on a device, people don't like the feeling of *cheap* plastic.
  • Psybuster - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    Curious about this too...the plastic on the edges of the original X weren't bad at all IMO. Wouldn't signal quality be better off without the aluminum band, despite the additional tuner?
  • JoshHo - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    That's the surprising part. The external antenna ends up more sensitive than an internal antenna would be.
  • Zoomer - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link

    The leather band is a large antenna. The internal antenna would likely be closer to other electronics, as well as being physically smaller. Both no good.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now