PCIe SSD Faceoff: Samsung XP941 (128GB & 256GB) and OCZ RevoDrive 350 (480GB) Tested
by Kristian Vättö on September 5, 2014 3:00 PM ESTFinal Words
Since we are dealing with two fairly different drives, I will split the conclusion into two by beginning with the XP941. The XP941 is still the fastest client SSD and while the 256GB model does not provide the same performance as the 512GB one, it is still faster than any SATA 6Gbps SSD by a hefty margin. The 128GB XP941 is a different story, though. It is not really faster than the 128GB 850 Pro because at such small capacity the performance is mostly NAND limited, except for large sequential read transfers where the SATA 6Gbps interface is the bottleneck.
The good news is that RamCity has lowered its pricing since May. The XP941 still carries a premium over SATA SSDs, but it is now more competitive in price at less than a dollar per gigabyte. For US-based customers, finding the XP941 in stock can be a bit difficult; Newegg has both the 128GB and 256GB models listed, but they're on backorder; meanwhile the 512GB model is in stock at Amazon, but only at a highly inflated price of $750.
| Price Comparison (9/4/2014) | |||||||||
| 120/128GB | 240/256GB | 480/512GB | 960GB/1TB | ||||||
| Samsung SSD XP941 | $127 | $252 | $486 | - | |||||
| Plextor M6e | $120 | $220 | $420 | - | |||||
| OCZ RevoDrive 350 | - | $517 | $810 | $1,260 | |||||
| Samsung SSD 850 Pro | $130 | $200 | $400 | $700 | |||||
| SanDisk Extreme Pro | - | $180 | $350 | $570 | |||||
The RevoDrive is a totally different case. The performance is only better in some corner cases where the drive is fed with high queue depth or large transfer data, and in most typical scenarios it is outperformed by SATA 6Gbps SSDs. In the end, the RevoDrive 350 is nothing more than a pre-built 4-drive RAID array, so it is only faster in cases where RAID in general is a benefit (e.g. heavily parallel IO workloads).
Not only is the RevoDrive relatively slow, it is also super expensive. For the price of the 240GB RevoDrive 350, you could get four 128GB 850 Pros with twice the total capacity and higher performance since the 850 Pro is faster than any single SandForce drive. The same goes for higher capacity RevoDrives too -- it is simply way more affordable to buy a bunch of SATA SSDs and build your own RAID array. Even if you do not know how to create a RAID array, I am sure you can find someone to do it for $50, in which case you would still save money and get a faster RAID array with better drives.
All in all, for those who are in the market for a PCIe SSD, the XP941 is the only serious option. It is the fastest client SSD on the market and as long as your motherboard includes boot support for it, it is the best client drive that money can buy at the moment. I am very excited to get my hands on the SM951 (and other native PCIe SSDs) because the XP941 is already great, but when you add PCIe 3.0, NVMe, and V-NAND to the mix it will be one hell of a drive.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
47 Comments
View All Comments
vLsL2VnDmWjoTByaVLxb - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link
I understand that sentiment, but even in the release notes of 11 series of drivers, let alone 12, performance enhancements are claimed for some SSD scenarios and interfaces versus others. This chipset is 3+ years old. It does the reader a disservice not to give them realistic modern setups to give them the best idea of what they will realistically come across. PCIe SSDs were in their infancy when this testbed came out. Several of these drives might even have firmware updates that improves their standing.It just seems like this testing setup is ideal for the testing environment itself, not the reader.
Perhaps a compromise could be reached where the testbed is stabilized after maturity of a current or previous chipset and Operating system (say the first major service pack, or a year, whichever is sooner), so that errata/bugs can be worked out.
In any case, thanks for the efforts!
Kristian Vättö - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link
SSD firmware updates are something we look at, as long as they claim performance improvements (I'm not going to spend a few days on testing if it just fixes an unrelated bug).Keep in mind that while we always try to prioritize our readers, the benchmarking must be humane to us too. If I switched the drivers every time there is an update, we would only have a couple of comparison points, which wouldn't do service to anyone.
Like I said, we have a new testbed with the latest drivers and that will actually be used for our new enterprise SSD suite. Unfortunately, the new testbed doesn't play nice with our Storage Benches and PCIe drives, so I can't transition the client suite until we get that figured out. Otherwise we would lose a major part of our benchmarks and I don't think anyone would want that.
CrazyElf - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link
Do you think that in the future, we will see the level of choice with M.2 SSDs that we get with SATA 3 SSDs?Right now it looks like Micron, Samsung, Plextor, and a few others have M.2 SSDs. With Z97 and X99 offering M.2 slots, this looks like a lot of promise, especially considering X99 M.2s are shipping with 32 Gb/s interfaces through PCI-E 3.0 x4.
Maybe not Ram disk speed, but still very fast.
Sunburn74 - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link
Why is it that the manufacturers of the revodrive have figured out how to make it universally bootable, but everyone else can't seem to do it?Kristian Vättö - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link
Others can do it (like Plextor did with the M6e) but the XP941 is an OEM product, so there is no need for Samsung to provide an universal driver since technically it should only be available as a pre-installed drive.The Von Matrices - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link
From your wording in the article it sounds like the OCZ drive use an option ROM to become bootable. Is this true? If so that would be a huge disadvantage since these option ROMs slow down the boot process by 20-30 seconds, an eternity in the world of UEFI.Kristian Vättö - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link
That is true, the OROM definitely adds 10-15 seconds to the boot time. However, that is not an issue if you sleep your computer like many people do nowadays.The Von Matrices - Monday, September 8, 2014 - link
While I don't think you should add an OS boot benchmark, I think it is important to at least mention the extra time required for booting somewhere in the article since that will turn off a not inconsiderable of people from the product.KarlKaiser - Sunday, September 7, 2014 - link
er... the Revodrive won't boot OSX, so not really 'universally bootable'SantaAna12 - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link
Timely review. I too would like to know about its benefit to the average user: gaming, 7zip, video etc. I have read that these can run very hot? Some have placed a heatsink on the Samsung. Does this degrade the drive?