Capture Latency

Along with its own rear facing camera sensor, the GS5 adapts a dual-mode autofocus system. Traditional AF designs in smartphones rely on testing contrast differences in order to determine when a point is in focus. With GS5, Samsung introduces a second mode: phase detection auto focus. Instead of relying (primarily) on contrast to determine focus, PDAF splits incoming light and compares intensity patterns to determine focus direction.

Low light scenes and scenes that can't generate appropriate phase info will default to contrast AF. PDAF appears to work across the camera's FOV although I did notice that the fastest AF times almost always happened in the center of the display.

Samsung claims a 300ms AF time thanks to its phase detection AF. In order to validate that claim I pointed a camera at a bunch of phones and measured AE/AF latency while preparing our ISO 12233 target shots from the previous page. 

I measured from the moment I tapped the focus target to the time the image stopped moving (I didn't rely on the AF lock indicator as some devices report focus lock prematurely). There's a bit more variance than I'd normally like in these numbers due to the nature of the capture, although I'm working on getting a higher speed camera to smooth some of that out.

Camera AE/AF Latency (Shooting ISO 12233 Target)

The GS5 definitely runs its AE/AF routine quickly, basically tying the M8 at the top of the charts here. The improvement over the GS4 is substantial, and there's even a big advantage over Apple's iPhone 5s. Note that if you move to lower light conditions you can see this number at least double, but that's something that impacts all of the devices here.

The Z1s is pretty frustrating because it has a great imaging system but an absolutely terrible camera UI. Focus speed is pretty bad compared to anything else here, basically on par with the iPhone 5/5c. 

The shortest time to focus I was able to record on the GS5 was 450ms in a different test scene, compared to 516ms for the M8. The GS5 can definitely be a hair faster but I found the M8 to be comparable if not slightly quicker overall.

Focusing is just one piece of the puzzle, I also measured capture latency as well. Here I'm looking at the time between when I tapped the capture button on the screen and when the camera UI was ready to take another shot. 

Camera Shot Latency (Shooting ISO12233 Target)

The GS5 remains solid, but here Apple actually pulls ahead. The 5c (and 5 by extension) are actually at the top of the charts here. Apple does some more work upon capture on the 5s, which is the only reason I can think of for the discrepancy here. Either that or the NAND on my 5s is in a dirtier state, impacting capture performance. 

Either way there's a huge improvement in capture speed compared to the GS4. Capture latency is one area where the Nexus 5 is absolutely horrible in. The latest updates made AE/AF reasonably responsive, but the capture latency kills the experience on the N5. 

This next chart combines the previous two values to give an overall picture of capture latency on these devices:

Camera Latency (Shooting ISO12233 Target)

Samsung's PDAF and ISP companion seem to do their job well as the GS5 is substantially quicker than the GS4 at image capture. That being said, HTC's M8 is slightly faster by comparison. 

Camera Architecture & Still Image Analysis That Fingerprint Scanner, Again
Comments Locked

296 Comments

View All Comments

  • synaesthetic - Thursday, April 17, 2014 - link

    I wish phone reviewers would test audio quality. I really, really do. But more than that, I wish they would test the one thing that is absolutely most important to audio quality on headphones, the one thing that can ruin good sound quicker than anything if it's not within the correct ratio...

    Output impedance.

    Nobody does this except that Korean blog Golden Ears, and the English translations just don't keep up with the new devices coming out. I really, really wish someone, anyone, anandtech or otherwise, would break out the multimeter and test output impedance!
  • Streamlined - Sunday, April 20, 2014 - link

    I agree. They did do an audio comparison of smartphones a few months ago that included, I think the S4. I believe the iPhone came out as the best overall audio quality in those tests.
  • Zoide - Sunday, April 13, 2014 - link

    Is it me or is the LG G2 the clear winner in the photo comparisons? I wonder why there's no mention of that in the review.
  • rwalker - Monday, April 14, 2014 - link

    curious about why you used Chrome and not Samsung's Android browser
  • heomapnhat - Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - link

    The reason why manufacturers drop those skins is not so they "look different" only but because they can somehow rationalize not updating the software on the device later and force you into an upgraded device sooner.

    Anyone buying a non-nexus phone is in this boat unless they want to do some work on their own to keep the devices up to date and that doesn't always quite work out right in terms of stability.
  • Davidjan - Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - link

    Like it. Galaxy phones always support Meenova MicroSD reader to add storage: http://goo.gl/2iJ6gf
  • 4techlover - Wednesday, April 16, 2014 - link

    the latest and greatest..

    http://www.businessinsider.com/samsung-galaxy-s5-f...
  • 4techlover - Wednesday, April 16, 2014 - link

    the latest and greatest..

    http://www.businessinsider.com/samsung-galaxy-s5-f...
  • Tjoe - Saturday, April 19, 2014 - link

    I wonder, is it possible to do a review on the Oppo Find 7a? I think it'd be quite interesting to see it up against the giants of the mobile phone industry.
  • charliehill - Sunday, April 20, 2014 - link

    I gonna buy this when the price goes down a little bit , hope this works well on my WIWOFIT Wireless Charger bought from Amazon. of course I will get a receiver card
    www.amazon.com/dp/B00J2TEL28

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now