CPU, GPU & NAND Performance

It’s really tough to say much here on the CPU and GPU side, although it seems that since we first looked at the MSM8974 there has been quite a bit of optimization in general, based upon some browser benchmarks that I tested. Once again, Brian has covered this, so I would reference the Nexus 5 review.

SunSpider Javascript Benchmark 1.0 - Stock Browser

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark - 1.1

3DMark Unlimited - Physics Test

3DMark Unlimited - Physics

On GPU, absolutely nothing changes here as far as I can tell, the performance I get on T-Rex and on the 3DMark suite is effectively identical to the numbers I’ve seen on other 8974 platform devices.

GLBenchmark 2.7 - T-Rex HD (Offscreen 1080p)

GLBenchmark 2.7 - T-Rex HD

3DMark Unlimited - Ice Storm

3DMark Unlimited - Graphics Test 2

3DMark Unlimited - Graphics Test 1

3DMark Unlimited - Graphics

The real story here is that LG doesn’t seem to be running any benchmark optimizations, which is certainly a far cry from other devices that I’ve looked at recently. This is good to see, and I hope that this becomes a trend with OEMs as the year goes on.

I Can't Believe I Also Have To Update This Table
Device SoC Cheats In
    3DM AnTuTu AndEBench Basemark X Geekbench 3 GFXB 2.7 Vellamo
ASUS Padfone Infinity Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 N Y N N N N Y
HTC One Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Y Y N N N Y Y
HTC One mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Y Y N N N Y Y
HTC One max Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Y Y N N N Y Y
LG G2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 N Y N N N N Y
LG G Pro 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 N N N N N N N
Moto RAZR i Intel Atom Z2460 N N N N N N N
Moto X Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro N N N N N N N
Moto G Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 N N N N N N N
Nexus 4 Qualcomm APQ8064 N N N N N N N
Nexus 5 Qualcomm MSM8974 N N N N N N N
Nexus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 N N N N N N N
Samsung Galaxy S 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 N Y Y N N N Y
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Y Y Y Y Y N Y
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 Intel Atom Z2560 N Y Y N N N N
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Samsung Exynos 5420 Y(1.4) Y(1.4) Y(1.4) Y(1.4) Y(1.4) N Y(1.9)
NVIDIA Shield Tegra 4 N N N N N N N
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 (Sprint) Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (MSM8930AB) N Y Y N N Y Y

On NAND, LG seems to be going after Samsung with their relatively fast storage, although it doesn’t quite beat the Note 3 when it comes to random writes.

Sequential Write (256KB) Performance

Sequential Read (256KB) Performance

Random Write (4KB) Performance

Random Read (4KB) Performance

Unfortunately, I just haven’t had enough time with the phone to be able to run all the battery life tests that are normally run for these reviews, but based upon the WiFi battery life test, LG seems to be doing all the right things when it comes to battery life, seeing as how they’re now occupying the top spot for the one test I’ve been able to run.

AT Smartphone Bench 2013: Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

Currently I don’t have any particular equipment that lets me test dBA, but based upon some testing with my ears and listening to random video clips of choice, I think that the HTC One continues to be louder, but the speaker on the LG G Pro 2 far from bad, and is likely one of the better rear-facing speakers that I’ve heard. The bass is probably the best that I’ve heard on a smartphone, although for ideal acoustics the speaker really needs a cupped hand or something similar to help with resonance. I hope to be able to follow-up this review with actual data in the future, but I think that it’s still possible to make a good judgment on the LG G Pro 2 even without all the data.

Display & Camera Conclusion
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • fenneberg - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    Also, - Brian + AT do not like a spare battery in a shirt with larger, hidden cell phone pockets.
  • blzd - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    Did you fail to notice the whole chart indicating your phone cheats on benchmarks? It's included with ever phone review such as this one.
  • Gunbuster - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    I know it's trivial but who designs the charger so it covers up your own company logo? Total marketing fail.
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    Uh.... Pretty sure that pic above is the anti theft device put on by whatever show the pics are taken from. Same as you see in any mobile phone store so no-one walks off with the device.
  • Gunbuster - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    That makes it even worse. Would you show up at a trade show and then put black tape over your company logo?
  • kmmatney - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    I'm pretty sure their booth has a lot of large company logos, so I don't think anyone isn't going to know who makes the phone...
  • Scrote - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    On the first page, in the photo at the top what is that green light thing sticking out of the phone?
  • CoryS - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    That's the security cable connected to it at a booth. For some reason he used a picture they probably took when it was announced as the cover photo.
  • Scrote - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    Thanks ^________^
  • kmmatney - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 - link

    I have an LG Optimus Pro G and one big problem I have is that the buttons are far to easily pressed, so I find the phone unusable without a cover. So the glossy back cover plate doesn't matter, since you need a cover anyways. I don't now if the button pressing is due to bad design, or just the phone being so big.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now