Gaming Benchmarks

Metro2033

Our first analysis is with the perennial reviewers’ favorite, Metro2033.  It occurs in a lot of reviews for a couple of reasons – it has a very easy to use benchmark GUI that anyone can use, and it is often very GPU limited, at least in single GPU mode.  Metro2033 is a strenuous DX11 benchmark that can challenge most systems that try to run it at any high-end settings.  Developed by 4A Games and released in March 2010, we use the inbuilt DirectX 11 Frontline benchmark to test the hardware at 1440p with full graphical settings.  Results are given as the average frame rate from a second batch of 4 runs, as Metro has a tendency to inflate the scores for the first batch by up to 5%.

Metro 2033 - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Metro 2033 1 GPU 2 GPU 3 GPU
AMD
NVIDIA  

Dirt 3

Dirt 3 is a rallying video game and the third in the Dirt series of the Colin McRae Rally series, developed and published by Codemasters.  Dirt 3 also falls under the list of ‘games with a handy benchmark mode’.  In previous testing, Dirt 3 has always seemed to love cores, memory, GPUs, PCIe lane bandwidth, everything.  The small issue with Dirt 3 is that depending on the benchmark mode tested, the benchmark launcher is not indicative of game play per se, citing numbers higher than actually observed.  Despite this, the benchmark mode also includes an element of uncertainty, by actually driving a race, rather than a predetermined sequence of events such as Metro 2033.  This in essence should make the benchmark more variable, but we take repeated in order to smooth this out.  Using the benchmark mode, Dirt 3 is run at 1440p with Ultra graphical settings.  Results are reported as the average frame rate across four runs.

Dirt 3 - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Dirt 3 1 GPU 2 GPU 3 GPU
AMD
NVIDIA  

Having access to full native lanes in tri-crossfire helps get that extra 10-30 FPS in Dirt3, although moving from 200 to 230 FPS is actually not that noticeable.

Civilization V

A game that has plagued my testing over the past twelve months is Civilization V.  Being on the older 12.3 Catalyst drivers were somewhat of a nightmare, giving no scaling, and as a result I dropped it from my test suite after only a couple of reviews.  With the later drivers used for this review, the situation has improved but only slightly, as you will see below.  Civilization V seems to run into a scaling bottleneck very early on, and any additional GPU allocation only causes worse performance.

Our Civilization V testing uses Ryan’s GPU benchmark test all wrapped up in a neat batch file.  We test at 1080p, and report the average frame rate of a 5 minute test.

Civilization V - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Civilization V 1 GPU 2 GPU 3 GPU
AMD
NVIDIA  

Sleeping Dogs

While not necessarily a game on everybody’s lips, Sleeping Dogs is a strenuous game with a pretty hardcore benchmark that scales well with additional GPU power due to its SSAA implementation.  The team over at Adrenaline.com.br is supreme for making an easy to use benchmark GUI, allowing a numpty like me to charge ahead with a set of four 1440p runs with maximum graphical settings.

Sleeping Dogs - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Sleeping Dogs 1 GPU 2 GPU 3 GPU
AMD
NVIDIA  

 

Computation Benchmarks ASUS Rampage IV Black Edition Conclusion
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • Origin64 - Sunday, January 5, 2014 - link

    Thats some tasty pasta, my friend!
  • bcg27 - Sunday, January 5, 2014 - link

    After reading the article about smart phone audio analysis using the Audio Precision audio analyzer I was hoping to see some mobo audio results as well. Any chance of that happening?
  • IanCutress - Sunday, January 5, 2014 - link

    Top of page 5 for some basic audio tests using the board itself. I unfortunately do not have any AP hardware to do tests here. We're all scattered around the world, no big office to all draw on the same equipment.
  • AssBall - Sunday, January 5, 2014 - link

    The Gisele Blumchen of ivy bridge boards. So sexy. So out of my league. I struggle to justify Asus Deluxe series, which mind you are excellent. This is so over the top though.
  • cactusdog - Monday, January 6, 2014 - link

    Nice board but not for me. Intel should be shot for not upgrading the chipset. They expect you pay $1,000 for CPU and motherboard but the features are worse than 2 year old mainstream chipset.

    I always get the high end but sandy-e/ivy-e was a big letdown. Hopefully, Haswell-e will make the high end worthwhile again.
  • fluxtatic - Monday, January 6, 2014 - link

    As regards the comment about this board missing Thunderbolt - is it just me, or has TB support fallen off a cliff? I honestly can't remember the last motherboard review I saw where it was mentioned the board had TB ports.
  • Sabresiberian - Monday, January 6, 2014 - link

    TYVM for adding sound analysis to your testing. :)
  • toyotabedzrock - Tuesday, January 7, 2014 - link

    Dare I ask what AliWangWang is? On page 2 there is a list of processes for setting up network priority.
  • doggghouse - Tuesday, February 4, 2014 - link

    I had to look it up... it's a chat program used for Taobao, which is sort of like eBay in China.
  • sparkyuiop - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link

    I bought 2 x AMD R9290 graphics cards for this but they don't clear the raised SATA ports or the north bridge chipset heatsink. Bummer!
    Don't try and mount the board in the corsair cases that have a rounded corner on the motherboard mounting panel, it don't go in! You can put 3 x double stand-offs at the SATA end 3 x single stand-offs at the I/O end and miss out screwing the middle fixings so as to slant the board but that's a bit shit when spending out the money for this hardware. So that's what I did!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now