Camera

Although it’s sometimes used as one, I still don’t believe the majority of the population uses a tablet as their primary imaging device. That doesn’t however mean that it can’t be used as as a camera. In fact, I do see an increasing number of situations where tablets are being used as cameras in a pinch. Particularly on the productivity side of things where you may need to take a photo of something you’re studying on site (e.g. insurance adjuster taking photos of a claim). All of this is a long winded way of saying that tablet camera performance matters. It doesn’t perhaps matter as much as it would in a smartphone, but it still matters.

The Galaxy Note 8.0 comes with a fairly standard two camera setup. Around back there’s a raised bump to accommodate a 5MP camera module (2560x1920) with F2.7 lens. Up front there’s a 1.3MP sensor (1280x960) and F2.8 lens. Neither camera has a flash of any sort.

The Note 8.0’s size actually doesn’t make it ridiculous to take photos with. The camera UI is fairly standard for Samsung and includes a fairly typical set of customization options (ISO, exposure adjustment, JPEG compression, etc...). Shot to shot latency is about on par with the iPad mini, but considerably slower than the latest and greatest smartphones like the HTC One.

Camera preview is relatively smooth but clearly not anywhere near full resolution, as a result photos tend to look pretty bad during framing but can come out surprisingly decent once captured.

Samsung integrates optional voice recognition with its camera app. You can say smile, cheese, capture or shoot to activate the shutter. The process works surprisingly well but it does add additional latency to shooting since the voice recognition isn’t instant. Oddly enough some words worked better than others for me, although accuracy improved the closer my face was to the tablet.

Image quality outdoors was surprisingly decent. Both the Galaxy Note 8.0 and iPad mini did relatively well on camera duty. Samsung's auto white balance could definitely use some work, and in lower light scenarios the iPad mini seems to resolve details better than the Note 8.0.

  Outdoor 1 Indoor Outdoor Nature Macro Outdoor Low Light
Apple iPad mini
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0

Low light performance is horrible on both tablets. In well lit scenarios, the Note 8.0 is a competent shooter though the iPad mini seems to do better overall. I was personally surprised by how well these tablets performed at macro shots. Again, I wouldn't use either as a primary shooter, but if your job requires embedding photos in emails and all you're carrying is one of these tablets you can make it work (assuming there's plenty of light around).

Video recording performance was also surprisingly decent on the Galaxy Note 8.0:

Multi Window Support WiFi, GPS Performance
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • danstek - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    I just have to say that the background used for the photos looks awesome!
  • klatscho - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    just had the same thought - nice one anand
  • hagmamad - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    stole the words out of my mouth
  • onwudinjo,uzorchi - Wednesday, April 24, 2013 - link

    hey guy checkout this page www.phy.unn.edu.ng for amazing information as regards academic excellence
  • nerdstalker - Friday, April 19, 2013 - link

    Hey, c'mon Anand... This is AnandTech, the gathering place of geeks and nerds. It's not The Verge. :P
  • mmartel - Saturday, April 20, 2013 - link

    Another thumbs up on the photos - beautiful background and photography.
  • nerdstalker - Sunday, April 21, 2013 - link

    I bet the photos look awesome on an iPad 4/5, rMBP or late-2012 iMac. ;) BTW, for a long time I expected AnandTech to review the late-2012 iMacs; but it didn't happen. :( I hope they review, at least when those get the next speed bump.
  • jeffkibuule - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    It's an interesting tablet for sure, but eh, we know we're going to get the Nexus 7 II with a 1920x1200 display and Qualcomm Snapdragon 600/800 in a month for $249-299. I'd just sit back and wait for the inevitable.
  • thesavvymage - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    hell, it can keep the 1280x720 res if it stays at the 200/249 price point. Im just hoping the usb otg isnt totally neutered like it is on the Nexus 4. We shall see...
  • MonkeyPaw - Thursday, April 18, 2013 - link

    It's actually 1280x800, but I really hope Google doesn't overdo the specs of Nexus 7.2 and forsake battery life. More than anything, I wish my Nexus 7 got a few more hours on a charge, especially during games. I appreciate a boost in specs, but I hope they are sane about it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now