Subjective Evaluation: TECK It to the Limit (One More Time!)

Bad puns aside, let me be very clear at this point: the layout and arrangement of the keys on the TECK is very different, more so than you might imagine just by looking at the pictures. Logically and to my eyes, the TECK layout makes a lot of sense, but when you first sit down to use it you’re going to be in for a rude awakening. Truly Ergonomic recommends giving yourself at least a few days, maybe a week or two, or perhaps as long as a month to adapt to the changes in the layout. While there’s a huge difference between a few days and a month, some people adjust more quickly than others and there’s still going to be improvement past the one week mark.

Personally, the first day (and in particular the first hour) using the TECK was a nightmare, with my typing speed going from around 65-70WPM on “normal” keyboards to less than 10 WPM with the TECK. Yeah, it’s that different! I had a friend come by who can type around 80 WPM and told her to just sit down and try a one minute typing speed test (with no warm up) on the TECK. She managed 5 WPM on her first go, but with an average number of errors of 6 WPM, for an adjusted speed of… zero. That’s likely where everyone will start, and you’ll have to dedicate at least an hour or two to the TECK before you become anywhere near proficient. As I mentioned in my First Impressions piece, the initial learning curve can be extremely frustrating, so you should plan for that. If I could have accurately captured my typing speed every few minutes over the course of learning the TECK, I imagine the plot would look something like this:

I can’t say whether the ramp in typing speed will happen in minutes, hours, or days, but it will happen if you stick with it (and preferably don’t swap back and forth between keyboards). After a couple days of typing, I was able to reach about 90-95% of my normal typing speed, and by the time two weeks had passed I was at 100% and perhaps a bit faster. Now, I just took the same typing tests as I used in the initial article, and I’m clearly faster with the TECK than with my previous keyboard. My scores, if you’re interested, are 76WPM on test 1 (0 errors), 78 WPM (1 error = 77 WPM) on test 2, and 70 (1 error = 69 WPM) on test 3. All three scores are up 3-5 WPM compared to my initial results, presumably thanks to the improvement in the ergonomics and the reduced range of motion required for typing. I also recorded the following video, after I was acclimated to the TECK, to see if I could notice a difference in the way I type.

Obviously there are some major differences in the number of mistakes I make on the Rosewill, but more noticeable to me is how my hands just look a lot more natural and don't appear to work as hard on the TECK. I’m by no means an expert typist, but objectively my typing speed is up slightly while subjectively I also feel as though my hands manage better with extended typing than on a regular keyboard. That's enough reason for me to give serious consideration to using the TECK on an extended basis.

While my typing experience is improved in many ways, there are some aspects of the TECK that I still haven’t quite adjusted to, and still other areas where I definitely feel I’m missing something I’d rather like to have. The lack of a dedicated 10-key is one such complaint that I've already touched on; I understand the idea behind making the TECK narrower than a traditional keyboard and bringing your mouse in closer, but I just don’t find it particularly necessary (for me; others might feel differently). The times when I’m using a mouse, I’m often not using the keyboard much—or else I’m playing a game. The placement of the cursor keys and document navigation keys already would reduce the width by a couple inches, and while the 10-key would still add three inches that’s a compromise I’d prefer to make. The reason is simple: I can’t reach normal 10-key speed with the TECK, not even close, and I make far more errors than I’d like. To illustrate, here’s another set of typing results, without any real warm up on either keyboard:

Regular 10-key: 7036 keystrokes per hour with 0 mistakes
TECK 10-key: 2914 keystrokes per hour with 0 mistakes

Now, part of the speed reduction is because I intentionally worked hard to not make any mistakes; there were plenty of errors and I had to go back and correct them. If I were doing dedicated 10-key input looking at a sheet of paper rather than the display, I would have had numerous errors and it would take a significant amount of time to improve. Errors in numeric input tend to be a lot more alarming than errors in text (hello accounting!), so I simply wouldn’t feel comfortable recommending the TECK to someone who does that sort of work without also recommending a separate 10-key—which not only eliminates the space saving benefit of the TECK but actually ends up being worse as you now have a second device cluttering up your desk.

I have a couple of other stories that I also want to relate, one illustrating the potential for problems with a revamped keyboard layout and the second that may be more about how I type (or perhaps my review keyboard). The first comes from my typing up of a review, the Dell XPS 12 Ultrabook if you’re curious. I normally type a significant portion of each laptop review on the laptop, in order to evaluate the keyboard, but since I was in the middle of working on the TECK review I didn’t want to “corrupt” my adjustment and so I was using the TECK (though previously I had done a decent amount of typing on the XPS 12 so I knew I liked it compared to many other Ultrabook keyboards).

During the course of the review, I had written about two thirds of the text (around 3000-4000 words, including the specs table), and for whatever reason I simply hadn’t saved most of that content. One evening I sat down to write some of my thoughts on Windows 8; unfortunately, while typing I pressed the left Control key instead of the Shift key out of habit (remember that the Shift on the TECK is on home row instead of adjacent to the Z). Instead of “Windows”, that became: CTRL+W, “Do you want to save the changes to ‘XPS 12 Review.docx’?” No. I was typing fast, so the “n” in Windows came along right around the same time that the dialog asking if I wanted to save popped up. Poof! The document was gone without being saved, and the scream of agony that escaped my mouth caused my wife and children to jump in alarm. Sadly, despite using several undelete utilities to see if I could find the auto-recovery file I failed and ended up having to rewrite most of that content. Blame me, blame Word 2007 (I’m old school, unlike Vivek), blame the TECK, whatever. The fact is, stuff like this can potentially happen, so you’ve been warned (again). It’s like a game: remember to save your progress regularly.

The second item that’s on my annoyance list might be more from the way I use the TECK than anything, but try as I might I still encounter the problem on occasion. When I first started using the TECK, I didn’t notice this, so either I adapted in some incorrect fashion to the MX Brown keys, or I got a flaky unit—but I’m more inclined to think it’s the former than the latter. With certain keys, I now get a periodic doubling of the character. Initially, this was happening with the “E” key, and at one point it was happening about 25% of the time. That’s a problem when you’re dealing with the “most common letter in the English language”, and I even went so far as to remove the key cap to see if something looked wrong with the switch (it looked perfectly fine, though it did seem to work better afterwards so maybe there was some grit in the switch). One key out of 86 having a bad switch would be possible, but then I started getting the problem with the “I” key as well. In both cases, it’s my middle finger reaching up to hit the respective key, and at this point it probably only occurs about 1-3% of the time (depending on what I’m doing), but it can be irritating and it often comes in spurts. If the problem is actually with the switch, Truly Ergonomic would be happy to replace it, but I'm actually not sure that's the case.

Finally, just to comment on the TECK in general, the keys come with a slightly textured finish. This in itself isn’t particularly noteworthy, but after just one month of typing I’ve found that many of the keys are starting to get a glossy sheen—the right spacebar in particular has a noticeable glossy mark, which you can see in the picture above, and I expect other keys will develop the same wear markings over time. I wouldn’t necessarily want them to change the keys, and I’ve had the same thing happen on pretty much every keyboard I can think of in recent years, but if that sort of thing bothers you it will be a concern with the TECK.

TECK: Rethinking Ergonomics Closing Thoughts: A New Spin on Ergonomics
Comments Locked

126 Comments

View All Comments

  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    Perhaps I missed it, but the biggest issue with "modern" keyboards is the change in shape and size of the Enter/Return key. In the old days, when keyboards were man-sized, the key was reverse L shaped and considerably larger, and could be reached with the little finger without twisting the wrist.

    I see that the Enter key is for the thumb. How much of the CTS burden reduction is due just to reducing use of that finger?
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    Possibly a lot. It took several days, maybe even a week or two, before I was accustomed to the new location of the Enter key, but it does make sense when you adapt. I find that anything that requires the use of my pinkies just tends to be more of a stretch than the other fingers, so getting the pinky off of Enter key duty is good. Of course, the poor left pinky still gets a workout over there hitting Shift...For whatever reason, I always use my left pinky for Shift when typing, though on the other hand I always use my right thumb for space. Heh.
  • Manabu - Saturday, March 23, 2013 - link

    I and almost everyone that I know also uses only one thumb for hitting space (generally the right too). I aways wanted a keyboard with a split space key, with the other half being either a shift or a enter key, with some more keys a bit lower by the center also for the thumb to hit.

    Instead, manufactures keep doing those gigant, loud, some times hard to press, space keys. Why, why not split it in two buttons, even if by default both are mapped to space?
  • AmigaGeek - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    I've been a user of Kinesis for ~15 years now. I started with the traditional QWERTY and a few years back switched it out to Dvorak. From my own personal experience, the transition is painful. Extremely painful. There were times when I wanted to pick up my keyboard and smash it repeatedly. Imagine having to admin UNIX boxes and have 3 broken fingers on each hand. That's what I felt like. However, after about a year (not months) I can say that I'm back up to speed. Again, from my experience, Dvorak isn't about "speed", it's about comfort. I can still switch between QWERTY and Dvorak and when I go back to Qwerty I notice a huge difference in finger travel. Either gets the job done, but as an owner of 3 Kinesis's I can't say enough about them.
  • Sam Lord - Thursday, March 14, 2013 - link

    @amigageek:
    "...Dvorak isn't about "speed", it's about comfort. I can still switch between QWERTY and Dvorak and when I go back to Qwerty I notice a huge difference in finger travel..."
    It's about both. I have a Typematrix Dvorak and it's pretty good, but DVORAK itself never *properly* applied the kappa test (frequency of particular keystrokes), so a new approach would be ideal. Predictive typing combined with a good kappa algorithm would ease typing immensely, as would vocal correction of prediction mistakes, IMO.
  • fic2 - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    "Poof! The document was gone without being saved, and the scream of agony that escaped my mouth caused my wife and children to jump in alarm."

    In Word: Office Button->Word Options->Save->Save AutoRecovery information every X minutes.
    Check the box to enable it.
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    You don't understand: when you close a document and it asks if you want to save, and you say "no", all the AutoRecovery files get wiped clean as well. I tried to recover them with undelete -- they have to be out there somewhere, right? -- but could find nothing that resembled my missing document.
  • marc1000 - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    perhaps some file-recovery program? like Nero's recovery tool? (can't remember the name). with on you could find the deleted temporary word document and get it back.
  • fic2 - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    Ah, yeah you are right I missed that part. Sounds like something that would happen the night before a thesis is due.
  • TeamSprocket - Thursday, March 7, 2013 - link

    This is certainly a unique looking ergo keyboard, seems better than the stuff other companies put out. I'd be willing to give it a try.

    Does this come in Dvorak?

    Not trolling, I'm seriously asking. I use Dvorak full time when able (self taught over 13 years ago, able to maintain over 100 wpm on a government typing test), but I'm equally fluent in QWERTY (because the rest of the world is stubborn, maintain over 60wpm). It's easy enough to switch to Dvorak in software, but I'd like to have it built into hardware if possible.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now