Display Quality

As is customary with these smaller notebooks (and notebooks in general these days), it should come as no surprise that the display on the HP EliteBook 2170p is pretty terrible. HP at least enjoys a matte finish on their display, but at the 11.6" form factor we're actually very close to tablet territory. A higher quality option on the 2170p would at least have been appreciated.

LCD Analysis - Contrast

LCD Analysis - White

LCD Analysis - Black

LCD Analysis - Delta E

LCD Analysis - Color Gamut

The display on the ASUS ZenBook Prime UX21A is pretty much how a small form factor display should be done. HP's is poor quality by almost any standard, with dismal gamut, accuracy, and contrast. The panel is actually worse than the already poor one from AU Optronics in the Acer Aspire V5-171, albeit not by much.

Battery Life

Unfortunately, while the poor battery life was more excusable on the Acer, the HP EliteBook 2170p suffers badly from its chintzy 4-cell, 30Wh stock battery. HP also offers a 6-cell, 48Wh battery, but you'll see efficiency in the 2170p really could be a lot better.

Battery Life - Idle

Battery Life - Internet

Battery Life - H.264 Playback

Battery Life Normalized - Idle

Battery Life Normalized - Internet

Battery Life Normalized - H.264

Normalized battery efficiency is very iffy, but raw running time with just the 4-cell battery is unacceptable. For web surfing, you get roughly three hours of productive use at 100 nits. That means you'll need the 6-cell battery if you want to use the 2170p off the mains for any period of time, as it just doesn't have the juice to keep going.

Heat and Noise

Thankfully, the one place where the HP EliteBook 2170p seems to really excel is in heat and noise management. The thick chassis may be a bit unwieldy for an ultraportable, but it does allow the notebook enough real estate to handle its thermals without getting too loud or too hot.

The i7 never goes above 75C on a core, which is frankly just fantastic for any notebook. Fan noise is also minimal, if constant, but it makes me wonder if HP couldn't have possibly tuned the fan to run a bit slower and coax at least a little more juice out of the battery. Like I said, the fan is never particularly audible, but it's obvious they have some thermal headroom to work with.

Application and Futuremark Performance Conclusion: Mixing the Bag
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • jabber - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link

    ....lemon.
  • cbrownx88 - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link

    Agreed.
  • secretmanofagent - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link

    I agree, call it for what it is. It sucks on performance, efficiency, and a horrible horrible display (which HP usually screws up on). I'm stuck with a different horrible EliteBook for work, and I want to set the thing on fire half the time.
  • fic2 - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link

    I would never spend $1k on a laptop with a 1366x768 display.
  • Mumrik - Saturday, December 1, 2012 - link

    Seconded.
    I feel so out of contact with whatever market it is that doesn't care about resolution...
  • BellaLohan - Sunday, December 2, 2012 - link

    what Karen implied I'm shocked that a mom able to make $8024 in four weeks on the network. (Click on menu Home more information)
    http://goo.gl/EeD3j
  • retrospooty - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link

    "I would never spend $1k on a laptop with a 1366x768 display."

    I wouldnt spend $100 with a display of that res. Seriously HP 1366x768 must die!
  • ArteTetra - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link

    A resolution of 1366x768 is fine on a 11.6 inch display.

    A resolution of 1366x768 is fine on a 11.6 inch display.

    A resolution of 1366x768 is fine on a 11.6 inch display.
  • Midwayman - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link

    Nope. 768px tall makes it like view webpages through a tank-slit.. 16:9 is a terrible aspect ratio made worse by low resolution. The 900px tall 16:9 screens are about the lowest that are really useful.

    Besides you can get a tablet with 1080p or better for $400 these days. 1366x768 is inexcusable on a machine that cost that much anymore.
  • jabber - Wednesday, December 5, 2012 - link

    Yeah 1440x900 should be the barest minimum on any laptop under 15" today.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now