EVGA Z77 FTW Overclocking

Note: Ivy Bridge does not overclock like Sandy Bridge.  For a detailed report on the effect of voltage on Ivy Bridge (and thus temperatures and power draw), please read Undervolting and Overclocking on Ivy Bridge.

Experience with EVGA Z77 FTW

With no automatic overclock options, users are forced to use either the BIOS to adjust the CPU frequency, or an updated version of ELEET software from the EVGA website.  Typically as an overclocker I jumped straight in with the BIOS.

The EVGA overclocking methodology is a little strange, albeit a bit simpler than some other implementations.  All the important options such as the CPU multiplier and voltages are all contained within the main overclocking menu.  There is even an ‘OC Mode’ option which disables all non-essential onboard controllers and ports to promote stability for competitive overclocking.  Memory has its own menu, which allows for full adjustment of memory parameters, but for BCLK adjustment users have to navigate to a completely separate menu just for the single value.

With the pair of ClearCMOS buttons on board, recovering from a failed overclock that did not correct itself immediately was easy enough to do and implement again in the BIOS.  If the system is not happy with the memory settings at boot time, the motherboard would produce the error code ‘55’ and beep several times to indicate this.

However memory can be a bit of an issue – I found that my kit would not perform at XMP. EVGA have said to me that memory is a priority right now and their board will work with the majority of standard mainstream kits.

When the more severe overclocks were being performed (4.6 GHz and above), the system would sometimes reduce the CPU multiplier automatically.  I found that this is due to the power settings in the BIOS, which need to be raised.  I personally set these at 250W (a value of 2000 as it takes values in 1/8 of a watt) and never had an issue, though without direct instructions do this seems a little odd.

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).

Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.  We also are using Intel's All-in-one Liquid Cooler with its stock fan.  This is a 120mm radiator liquid cooler, designed to mimic a medium-to-high end air cooler.

Manual Overclock:

Our manual overclock testing was simple, starting at our standard 1.100 volts and 44x multiplier with Ivy Bridge.  For stability we adjusted the VDroop in the BIOS to Disabled fairly quickly, and at higher multipliers the power limits of the CPU were adjusted to stop the system reducing the CPU multiplier.  Here are our results:

At 44x, the BIOS was set to 1.100 volts on the CPU and VDroop left at Intel SPEC.  In the OS this produced a memory error during PovRay.  Thus VDroop was adjusted to ‘disabled’, which gave stability.  The system showed 1.138 volts at load, with peak temperatures of 71°C during PovRay and 74°C during OCCT.

At 45x, the system was stable at a minimum BIOS voltage setting of 1.100 volts, which showed 1.126 volts in the OS at load.  Peak temperatures observed were 72°C during PovRay and 73°C during OCCT.

At 46x, the system was stable at a minimum BIOS voltage setting of 1.125 volts, which showed 1.150 volts in the OS at load.  Peak temperatures observed were 77°C during PovRay and 80°C during OCCT.

At 47x, the TDP limits for the CPU were raised to 250W.  With this, the system was stable at a minimum BIOS voltage setting of 1.175 volts, which showed 1.197 volts in the OS at load.  Peak temperatures observed were 82°C during PovRay and 84° during OCCT.

When attempting to reach 48x, the system was still not stable at 1.275 volts set in the BIOS, causing PovRay to hang the system after a couple of minutes and temperatures to rise above 100°C.

EVGA Z77 FTW In The Box, Voltage Readings Test Setup, Power Consumption
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • Namesblank - Tuesday, July 26, 2022 - link

    10 years later, people be looking for how to build system with 20+ GPUs lmao
  • mayankleoboy1 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    Where are the GPGPU benchmarks? AFAIK, those are affected by the PCIE 3.0 bandwidth, as shown in the HD7970 review.

    Games are more or less happy with a PCIE2.0 x8 .
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link

    A few GP-GPU apps are affected, most aren't. Even PCIe 3 is slow as hell from the perspective of the GPU, so you try to avoid external communication as much as possible.
  • TimoKyyro - Wednesday, August 29, 2012 - link

    I was hoping to see some GPU rendering too. I'm using CUDA on Blender and I really need more GPU power. It would be nice to know if there is a difference between 4x 680 or 2x 690 on different PCIe setups.
  • extide - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    Thanks for providing the diagrams of lane routing. I wish ALL manufacturers would supply a diagram with their boards so you know how to set it up when you are building a system. Sadly, these diagrams are the exception, not the rule. :(
  • processinfo - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    For me only EVGA seems worth consideration (I don’t like a fan on chipset though).

    I have few requirements that others do not meet.

    I want PS/2 keyboard port (don’t care about mouse). I don’t see it as legacy. It is still superior to USB for keyboard. Works on interrupts instead of pulling, allows as many keys pressed without ghosting as you wish (know it probably does not matter in real life but I like that anyway).

    Display port output is mandatory for me these days. While it is true that this kind of mobo will run dedicated graphics card (or more than one for that matter) I like to have output here for possibility to use it with CPU graphics if my graphic cards breaks and needs replacement (I had that happen and waited almost two weeks for new one). HDMI is no go because does not support high enough resolution.

    Gigabyte is out for me because audio chip. Maybe it is better but it does not do 7.1 and I will lose two channels in my Tiamat 7.1 headset.
  • rwpritchett - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    You should check out some of the newer USB keyboards. I don't know how they do it, but some of them can now do full NKRO without PS/2. My Nighthawk X9 can do full NKRO over USB.
  • processinfo - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link

    Interesting but this is not possible with standard USB keyboard protocol. If it does that it has to use some tricks and most likely custom keyboard driver.

    Also I have Thermaltake Meka G1 that I like and I purchased because I got tired replacing membrane keyboards so I rather buy motherboard with PS/2 then new keyboard.

    My point is that at this price point and clearly meant for gamers (who else is using more than one graphic card in non-workstation pc) they should think about such details especially when they go overboard with other ports, e.g., who needs all 4 kinds of display output on gaming mobo, or 10 USB ports on back plate alone (if you need plenty you can have them on bracket connected to header).
  • MacGyverSG1 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    I loved the review. The G1.Sniper 3 was on my short list for a while. Could get back on, though.

    I'm waiting for the ASUS Maximus V Extreme to get tested next.

    I only need a motherboard to complete my new build. I plan on running this new rig for 6+ years so I want a board that can keep up with the times.
  • just4U - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link

    I am staying away from the Rampage/Maximus lines from Asus this time out as Gigabyte has pretty much brought better value accross the board on their gamer boards. I don't expect Asus to catch up till the next chipset..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now