AnandTech Storage Bench 2011, Light Workload

Our new light workload actually has more write operations than read operations. The split is as follows: 372,630 reads and 459,709 writes. The relatively close read/write ratio does better mimic a typical light workload (although even lighter workloads would be far more read centric). The I/O breakdown is similar to the heavy workload at small IOs, however you'll notice that there are far fewer large IO transfers:

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011—Light Workload IO Breakdown
IO Size % of Total
4KB 27%
16KB 8%
32KB 6%
64KB 5%

Light Workload 2011—Average Data Rate

Switching to Light suite doesn't change the story; the M3 Pro is still a brilliant performer. Only the Kingston HyperX 3K is faster, but once again the 0.6MB/s difference is insignificant.

Light Workload 2011—Average Read Speed

Light Workload 2011—Average Write Speed

Light Workload 2011—Disk Busy Time

Light Workload 2011—Disk Busy Time (Reads)

Light Workload 2011—Disk Busy Time (Writes)

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 Performance Over Time and TRIM
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • Coup27 - Sunday, July 1, 2012 - link

    I agree. I welcome another SSD toolbox into the mix, but with its current feature set, it is largely pointless. Manual TRIM for a toolbox utility is essential.

    I presume that Samsung make Toshiba's NAND for them? I did not know that.
  • Kristian Vättö - Sunday, July 1, 2012 - link

    Samsung and Toshiba both make their own NAND. Toshiba does have a joint venture with SanDisk though (similar to what Intel and Micron are doing).
  • Coup27 - Monday, July 2, 2012 - link

    "The NAND is once again from Toshiba and there are a total of eight NAND packages on the PCB. These are 32GiB quad-die packages and are manufactured using Samsung's 24nm process"

    I don't understand this then?
  • Kristian Vättö - Monday, July 2, 2012 - link

    That's a typo/error. Fixed now :-)
  • csroc - Sunday, July 1, 2012 - link

    At least the author knows who Plextor is this time!
  • pheadland - Sunday, July 1, 2012 - link

    OCZ also has an SSD toolbox, and it more functionality than the Plextor one.
  • Belard - Monday, July 2, 2012 - link

    Last time I checked... its just a ROM/FIRMWARE upgrade tool.

    Hence, I buy and tell friends to get Intel drives. I'll gladly pay the extra $20~30 for the reliability, support and upper-class performance. Sure its NOT #1, but I'll take a slight performance hit over BSODs and full out failures.

    I had to explain to a client his SSD that Dell installed in his high end Dell is a Samsung that doesn't support TRIM... its new enough to be SATA3/6Gbs - and yet its performance is already SLOWER than my own intel G2 M25 drive (SATA 2).

    The Intel tool box if full featured. 3.0x is quite nice.
  • KAlmquist - Sunday, July 1, 2012 - link

    I ask because the write performance of SSD's can vary a lot depending on how full the drive is. The Vertex 4 even uses a different block allocation algorithm if the drive is less than half full.
  • Kristian Vättö - Sunday, July 1, 2012 - link

    Storage Bench is run on a clean drive.
  • KAlmquist - Monday, July 2, 2012 - link

    So it measures how the drives perform when they have a lot of free space. Thanks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now