Sandy Bridge-E and X79 – The ASUS P9X79 PRO Review
by Ian Cutress on November 14, 2011 3:01 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Asus
- X79
3D Movement Algorithm Test
The algorithms in 3DPM employ both uniform random number generation or normal distribution random number generation, and vary in various amounts of trigonometric operations, conditional statements, generation and rejection, fused operations, etc. The benchmark runs through six algorithms for a specified number of particles and steps, and calculates the speed of each algorithm, then sums them all for a final score. This is an example of a real world situation that a computational scientist may find themselves in, rather than a pure synthetic benchmark. The benchmark is also parallel between particles simulated, and we test the single thread performance as well as the multi-threaded performance.
As expected, due to the 3960X, we have a clear lead on 3DPM. In single thread mode, we have a 3.9 GHz core taking top place, and the power of 12 threads at 3.6 GHz in multithreaded mode shows in the 914.76 score.
WinRAR x64 3.93 - link
With 64-bit WinRAR, we compress the set of files used in the USB speed tests. WinRAR x64 3.93 attempts to use multithreading when possible.
The more cores and threads for WinRar also play a role in providing some excellent times in comparison to other chipsets.
FastStone Image Viewer 4.2 - link
FastStone Image Viewer is a free piece of software I have been using for quite a few years now. It allows quick viewing of flat images, as well as resizing, changing color depth, adding simple text or simple filters. It also has a bulk image conversion tool, which we use here. The software currently operates only in single-thread mode, which should change in later versions of the software. For this test, we convert a series of 170 files, of various resolutions, dimensions and types (of a total size of 163MB), all to the .gif format of 640x480 dimensions.
In this single threaded workload, no real difference is seen compared to P67, showing that for FastStone, memory is not a limiting factor, and the move to SB-E doesn't make much of a difference.
Sorenson Squeeze 6.0 - link
Sorenson Squeeze is a professional video encoder, complete with a vast array of options. For this test, we convert 32 HD videos, each a minute long and approximately 42 MB in size, to WMV 512KBps format. Squeeze can encode multiple videos at once, one for each thread.
With Squeeze being a fully multithreaded test, we're comparing a 4 thread i5-2500K to a 12 thread 3960X, so it's no wonder that the 3960X comes out on top.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
55 Comments
View All Comments
markgerazzi - Saturday, November 19, 2011 - link
Also very important, will the Noctua D14 fan block or compromise any of the 8 DImm slots?THanks!
CodeToad - Friday, December 2, 2011 - link
I know my workstations... they had to pry my Sun 20 out of my dying hands! All the P9X79 lacks as a true workstation are SAS+SATA control and some Intel virtualization and net tech, at least on the WS model. That would have been easy to add, and I'm sorry Asus failed to go the extra step with the WS model.The P9X79 lacks nothing that I can see for the enthusiast - in fact there are huge possibilities for overclocking, tweeking, water cooling, and improvement via add-on boards.
There is the issue of threading in current games. Worry not! Every developer I know is urgently learning to improve their code at compile time, including deeply threading applications.
Yes, the board is expensive. So are all the rest in the Top Tech arena. I've looked for another board for the i7-3960X class, and can't find anything cheaper on balance. My experience with Asus build quality and their warranty are final decision factors for me.
I urgently need to build a machine for home office use. I do heavy OLAP and Data Mining research, and I contribute to open source -- the R project and others. I'm also a heavy WS virtualization user. Whatever I choose will be feed by two mid-range servers on a cheap switched 1K+ network, my total "IT Dept." Soon I will have to learn CUDA, and this board will serve will with the right video, since behind the visualization is a ton of computation.
Yes, I could build a server-like box, but I think this board, tons of fast switched memory, and the Core i7-3960X CPU may do better than a traditional dual machine. I'll have to add some boards, but that would be required with any motherboard.
So it's a bit of a risk, but I'm sold.
Thus to all -- if you want to "pee on the tall weeds with the big dogs," the P9X79 is the board and the Intel I7-39x0 is the CPU to do it.
InfiDELL - Thursday, December 8, 2011 - link
While X38 was really something over P35 and P45 from X58 to X79 eve I can't see a difference that will worth the money invested in 1366,1356 socket boards.The extra USB or the power to tweak a CPU that already doesn't have enough backbone for his power?
Or the extra bandwidth of VGA which is so small vs the high price of this boards and CPU.
Not to say it consume more Watts than sandy.
I really scrambled my brains to find the advantages of this boards in IO and ram latency over 1155 boards but, I can't really see but very small differences in performance and with what cost.
I expected that triple channel , quad channel and the native sata 6gb will really tell me something on so called enthusiastic boards. So the CPU and whole system will benefit from lower RAM latency and the rest need it for a big brain as latest CPUs are capable off.
I expected that SB on X79 will really get in flames of so much IO but no, it only burning your pocket for more multicolored heat-sink or some worthless shape.
In top of all extra expenses we get the power bill higher as this boards + their CPU consume quiet more.
Coming back to x38, yes is better than P45 and consume about 25 watts more but, easy taken by P965 in performance and power consumption and for me P965 remain the king of DDR 2 platforms as I tested Asus P5EWS pro X38 , Abit quad GT P965, asus P5K deluxe P965 and Maximus II P45.
History repeat itself.
I'll go prolly to a common 1155, is not worth to wait for X79 CPUs to go down in price as this boards are not shining for me and the same for 1366.
Very disappointing results but thank you for tests it's clear again for me10th time now is not really a deal but, a rip off.
dgingeri - Friday, January 13, 2012 - link
I have a need for lots of memory, even up to 32GB: virtual machines. My current virtual host system (Core i7 950) has 12GB, and I run several small virtual machines for my MCITP testing prep. I currently have 2 domain controllers, a SQL server, an Exchange server, a WDS and WSUS system, and 2 virtual workstations, all to practice for my MCITP tests. (Now I just need to get the money to actually take the tests. 9 tests are pretty expensive.) It's well worth the time and money to get a system like this for that purpose. It's even more cost effective than classes for me.candabi - Thursday, January 26, 2012 - link
I'm looking for a soho server for Virtualize several machines so, I like this Mobo for its 8 memoriy slots, but Is it possible to install Win2K8 w/o any problem?I want to use the teaming functionallity of my Synology iSCSI NAS with two LAN ports.
So, I am thinking on purchase one DUAL LAN card, or two separated LAN cards in order to connect them directly to NAS.
And the integrated LAN, it could be connected to the USERS SWITCH.
Do you think is possible? What DUAL LAN card do you recommend?
Tks