Test Setup

Processor AMD Fusion APU E-350 Dual-Core 1.6 GHz
Up to 2 "Bobcat" cores, FT1 BGA
80 Stream Processors, 500 MHz
Motherboards ASUS E35M1-M PRO
Cooling Standard Cooling
Power Supply Jeantech 250 W
Memory G.Skill RipjawsX F3-14900CL9Q-16GBXL
Memory Settings DDR3 1333MHz - 9-9-9-24 1T at 1.5 V
Hard Drive OCZ Vertex 3 240GB
Optical Drive Samsung SH-S223Q
Case Dimastech Bench Table
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
SATA Testing OCZ Vertex 3 240GB
USB 2/3 Testing Patriot 64GB SuperSonic USB 3.0

Many thanks to…

Before we go any further, I'd like to take the time to thank G.Skill for providing us with a set of their RipJawsX RAM for my future AMD reviews, in particular, the F3-14900CL9Q-16GBXL kit of which two sticks were used. It is a 16GB (4x4GB) kit which is rated at DDR3-1866MHz with 9-10-9-28 timings on as little as 1.5 volts. It is currently available from Newegg for $149.99.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system as a whole with a wall meter connected to the power supply, while in an IGP configuration.  This method allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency.  These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.  The power supply used for this test was a generic 250W model from JeanTech.

Power Consumption - IGP

Out of the A50M motherboards which we have had on test, the ASUS E35M1-M PRO has the lowest average power rating across the four tests which we ran.

CPU Temperatures

With most users running boards on purely default BIOS settings, we are running at default settings for the CPU temperature tests.  The results of a CPU Temperature test are not easily interpretable – if a motherboard vendor has buffered the amount of copper in the board between the power delivery and the CPU, this lowers the resistance and increases the CPU default voltage causing higher temperatures (but better stability).  However, a high temperature could result from using different types of onboard devices, FETs, or the quality of the CPU temperature sensor, so the overall interpretation is purely speculative.  The only thing a CPU test can say for sure is how warm the CPU is.

It could be argued that the CPU temperature is an indication of how well (or how adventurous) the vendor has their BIOS configured on automatic settings.  A certain number of vendors not making CPU voltage, turbo voltage or LLC options configurable to the end user, which would directly affect power consumption and CPU temperatures at various usage levels.

CPU Temperatures

The thermal tests were conducted without the included fan, just like the other Fusion motherboards. As you would expect,  the temperatures are significantly lower if you use the fan. For example, if you stress the system with OCCT, the temperatures come down from 54 °C to just 39 °C. The fan is whisper quiet during normal operation and should not be noticed in a HTPC environment - however, when the system is stressed and the fan speeds up to 100%, it does get quite loud.

Board Features, In The Box, Software System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

66 Comments

View All Comments

  • Aries1470 - Thursday, October 27, 2011 - link

    p.s. I Forgot to mention that although it is capable of blue-ray etc it is only a DX9 that they have paired it with. They did not use the other options that S3 provide for at least a DX10.1
  • silverblue - Thursday, October 27, 2011 - link

    Nano X2 is a very promising technology, but reviews (and comparisons) have been somewhat lacking thus far. Unlike the 65nm single core variants, these are 40nm, and from looking at them in comparison to the E-350 and Zacate, they're the fastest, if only slightly ahead of the AMD part. It would be good to see VIA and AMD do well in this market.

    There was a look here in the Brazos review:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/4134/the-brazos-revi...

    There's a video here of the 4350's power consumption and video playback:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FI4ctKzGnQ

    Here's one of the 4650 quad core variant:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXeROMRmqTA&fea...
  • Aries1470 - Sunday, October 30, 2011 - link

    Hi silverblue,

    Just wanted to say thank you for the links. Would have been great in the brazos review if they also had the power consumption, not just how powerful it is ;-)

    Great youtube links too.

    Just didn't know that the Nano X2 was better than the Brazos. You hear all about AMD but nearly nothing about VIA.
  • UrQuan3 - Wednesday, November 9, 2011 - link

    After Via sold S3 (their graphics group) I have heard very little from them. They had a good looking chipset in the works, but we probably won't see it now. I'm actually tempted to ask for one of the engineering samples like the one Anand reviewed.
  • Finraziel - Monday, October 31, 2011 - link

    Used this board's little mini-itx brother, the E35M1-I, in a build for my mom a while ago... Built into a mini-itx case with laptop power supply, a 500 GB WD Blue drive and a slimline DVD burner, along with one 120mm scythe fan (the slim version so it would fit), and it only used just over 20 watts in idle... Of course, it's not quite the same board, but I'm still guessing that 250 watt PSU is still pretty inefficient.
    My mom's completely happy with this system btw, she browses the web, plays some casual games, some minimal office work, and for that kind of usage this system offers plenty of power. Also with the 20-25 watt power draw, it doesn't matter that she never turns her PC off.
  • Harry Lloyd - Monday, October 31, 2011 - link

    How come this board has eSATA, and NOT ONE FM1 board does?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now