If you haven't gotten the hint, today is all about Llano. The big story is of course Llano's notebook appearance; however, in the coming weeks you'll be hearing a lot more about Llano on the desktop as well. This is AMD's Socket-FM1, the brand new socket that'll be used for desktop Llano parts:

If you read our Computex coverage, the socket should look pretty familiar. Motherboard manufacturers all over Taiwan are busy readying their Socket-FM1 boards for retail release. In fact, there was so much interest in desktop Llano on behalf of the motherboard manufacturers that a number of Socket-FM1 boards and CPUs made their way off the island as Computex ended.


Existing Socket-AM3 coolers will work on FM1 motherboards

By now you may have already seen a lot of information leaked from AMD's Llano presentations, as well as its desktop strategy. In the past few days performance numbers have been revealed as well. While we're hard at work on our full review of AMD's desktop Llano APU, we wanted to chime in with some thoughts on Llano's desktop performance.

AMD isn't ready to disclose pricing or the entire product matrix for Llano on the desktop, but what we do have is the high-end desktop Llano SKU: AMD's A8-3850.

The 3850 has four cores running at 2.9GHz and doesn't support Turbo Core. On the GPU side it has the full Radeon HD 6550D configuration with 400 shader processors running at 600MHz.

Sandy Bridge's GPU performance is the target, but how much better will AMD do on the desktop? Let's find out.

CPU Performance: Pretty Much an Athlon II X4
POST A COMMENT

131 Comments

View All Comments

  • ET - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    Also for gaming. Hopefully Llano prices will end up a little lower than rumoured, otherwise might as well buy an Athlon II X4 635 + Radeon HD 6570 ($160 together at Newegg). Reply
  • Exodite - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    What do you mean?

    That the general populace does/doesn't buy computer with gaming in mind?

    Because from these numbers Llano is as incapable of handling gaming as any other IGP. Aside from casual gaming, flash games and the like, but then again every IGP can handle that.

    The bare minimum for gaming is doing native resolution, meaning 1080p today, at low-medium settings with no AA at tolerable framerates.

    I'm not seeing that here.
    Reply
  • ET - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    I mean that Llano is also disappointing for gaming. I thought it was clear from context, but apparently it wasn't. I'm glad you've agreed with me.

    Still, I disagree with your assertion regarding bare minimum gaming. WoW at 720p is probably what separates a gaming capable PC from one that isn't.
    Reply
  • Exodite - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    Re: WoW, granted.

    I just feel WoW is a poor representation of the GPU prowess of Llano as the game is by far and large CPU-bound, as most MMOs, RPGs and RTSs are.

    Shooters are by far and large the common denominator for mainstream gaming.
    Reply
  • norwayishot - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    WoW is the single most mainstream game out there....

    Other titles I would consider mainstream are Call of Duty, Fifa, Portal, Minecraft...

    I'm pretty sure all of these titles would get 100 fps in Llano
    Reply
  • ET - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    By the way, I think Llano could have a place where space is a premium, such as nettops and all in ones. The main problem here is power consumption and heat, and I wonder if the desktop Llano will be good enough in these respects. Reply
  • Mathos - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    Whats the story on chipset plans for the Llano chips? Are they going to do a 990GX chipset that could be run in crossfire with the APU's GPU? Can these GPU's in the processor be used for hybrid crossfire the same as the GX chipset iGPU's can, for example with a discreet 6550? Reply
  • milli - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    "However Intel does have a history of building upon ideas that AMD introduced before their time (e.g. IMC, x86-64, Fusion), "

    AMD didn't invent IMC.
    AMD didn't invent 64bit computing.
    AMD didn't invent Fusion (well they did invent the brand name).

    So please, don't mix things up. Don't think that Intel only looks at the x86 market for ideas. Having some of the old Alpha & Elbrus people there, i don't think they're short on ideas. It's just when they want to implement them.
    Reply
  • ET - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    So who exactly invented x86-64 if not AMD? Perhaps it didn't invent "64 bit computing", which is a completely irrelevant argument, but it did invent the most far reaching enhancement of the x86. Reply
  • Lonbjerg - Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - link

    "but it did invent the most far reaching enhancement of the x86. "

    You say that like it's a good thing?
    x86 should have died years ago.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now