Test Setup
Processor Intel i5-2500K ES—3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz Turbo)
4 Cores, 4 Threads, 6MB L3
Motherboards ASUS P8Z68-V PRO ($210)
Cooling Corsair H50-1 Water Cooler
Power Supply Silverstone 1000W 80 PLUS Silver
Memory Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-2000 9-10-9-27 2x4GB Kit, 1.65V
Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 2x4GB Kit, 1.50V
G.Skill RipjawsX DDR3-2133 9-11-9-28 4x4GB Kit, 1.65V
Memory Settings DDR3-1333 9-9-9-24 1T 2x4GB
Video Cards XFX HD 5850 1GB
Sapphire HD 5850 1GB
Video Drivers Catalyst 10.12
Hard Drive Micron RealSSD C300 256GB
Optical Drive LG GH22NS50
Case Open Test Bed—CoolerMaster Lab V1.0
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit
SATA Testing Micron RealSSD C300 256GB
USB 2/3 Testing Patriot 64GB SuperSonic USB 3.0

Power Consumption

Power Consumption—Idle

Power Consumption—Video

Power Consumption—OCCT

Power Consumption—Metro 2033

CPU Temperatures

CPU Temperature—Idle

CPU Temperature—Video

CPU Temperature—OCCT

The ASUS P8Z68-V PRO doesn't do too badly in the temperature tests, but it is towards the bad end on our power consumption tests.

ASUS P8Z68-V PRO: UEFI and Overclocking System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • cybersans - Saturday, June 4, 2011 - link

    if you need us to write a proper english language to reply a posts, i think you reach at the wrong place, because this is not a classroom or english language test at the school ;)

    as long as a people around the world understand the message, thats fine for me.
  • BaCh - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    Is ASUS P8Z68-V PRO compatible with Intel Xeon E3-1275 processor?
  • cybersans - Saturday, June 4, 2011 - link

    xeon e3-1275 is based on socket 1155, so yes, it is compatible. but why you want to use server processor into workstation motherboard since it is lack of some features?
  • mattmc61 - Friday, May 13, 2011 - link

    I 'm sorry if this sounds like nit-picking, but after the fifth gramatical error on the first page of this article, I feel it necessary to point out the poor grammer, model number mistakes, and what seems like a lack of editing. I would think an article on such a high caliber tech site would be more careful.
  • austonia - Saturday, May 14, 2011 - link

    Anandtech, I am disappoint. You didn't even benchmark the Quick Sync video transcode function, which is the main reason I'm getting a Z68. Trading in my P67 (recall) for it.

    I know Anand has covered this feature before in a previous article (Jan. 31) but it would be reassuring to see the results of tests run on retail hardware. As did Tom's:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-z68-expr...
  • Googer - Wednesday, May 18, 2011 - link

    Looks like my favoritism for ASUS has just swung in the favor of Gigabyte.

    As a die hard keyboard fanatic, the complete lack of PS/2 support is a complete deal killer for me. I have tried USB PS/2 adapters and find they are loaded with problems, input latency, and incompatibilities (keystroke combinations, stops working after holding W down for 15 seconds, etc). I can sort of understand dropping PS/2 mouse support (even though I prefer a PS2 mouse). but keyboards just work much better on PS2 since its using dedicated hardware vs software for USB keys and mice.

    -Long Live PS2 and Good OLD Quality Clicky Keyboards.
  • Googer - Wednesday, May 18, 2011 - link

    *I've tried nearly all PS/2 to USB keyboard adapters, including the expensive ones from PI Engineering.
  • cybersans - Saturday, June 4, 2011 - link

    agree, switching to this motherboard from previous p8p67 caused me to get ps2 - usb converter. seems like the conversion give some problem, when i type seems like some words is mistype, not because of my broken fingers, but i suspect because of the conversion. another thing when i play a game for example need for speed undercover, the up arrow use to accelerate the car is not continously accelerating. when i press the up button on the keyboard, the car accelerate until several seconds, it stops. seems like i press the fuel paddle and several seconds the fuel stops.
  • ruzveh - Thursday, May 19, 2011 - link

    When these motherboard builders will wakeup and understand? We dont want to see those VGA ports on motherboards. AIt is of no use for anyone. Today whoever is buying a $150+ boards have monitors which support HDMI DVI or DP. We actually dont want to see limited resolution VGA port which is now really outdated like ur brains. If you want to provide with VGA option then do so via a DVI to VGA connector accessory. Dont waste the unnecessary space on the mdb. It can be used to provide us with that extra space for USB ports or eSATA.
  • Googer - Sunday, May 22, 2011 - link

    Many gamers and photoshoppers out there still use Analog CRT monitors. As far as connectivity goes, the VGA port is the most common denominator and almost any monitor can accept it's input.

    If you are a system builder, a board like this would be a good basis for a value added system and vga is ideal for that situation.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now