DigitalStorm's Take

I got in touch with DigitalStorm to discuss my concerns about the processor voltage, and after a bit of back and forth and discussion with Anand, we felt it would be best to include a statement from them:

Dear Dustin Sklavos,

Thank you for taking the time to recently review our Enix gaming system. We greatly appreciate your thorough attention to detail and are very interested in the voltage concern that you discovered while stressing the CPU.

After further testing at our facility, we were able to lower the offset voltage slightly while maintaining stability, but we quickly hit a stability wall while running our stress-test suite of LinX (AVX binaries with SP1) and Prime95. The Asus P8P67-M Pro does not have fine value adjustments for CPU Vcore, load line calibration, PLL overvoltage, phase control, and duty control. Without the option to enter exact values on these adjustments, a higher CPU offset voltage was needed in order to successfully pass our stress-test suite.

From our experience, the constant load voltage range of 1.45V to 1.48V from a Prime95 CPU burn-in test on the Enix at 4.7Ghz is an ideal range for the long term stability and performance of a system that is overclocked to almost 5GHz. In the past, when we’ve tried to use the absolute bare voltage necessary to achieve stability, a processor overclocked to 4.7GHz+ may become unstable after a month or two. Taking that into consideration, we want to ensure our customers receive a long-term stable system. The Enix is also configured to only supply that much voltage under the most extreme stress conditions. Under normal web browsing or gaming, a system will never experience the same stress conditions.

In addition, to ensure all of our current Enix customers are protected, we are automatically extending warranty coverage for any CPU related issues for up to 10 years from the date of purchase.

I am glad to hear that our Enix passed all of your tests with flying colors and that there were no issues with the stability of the system. I appreciate your feedback as it is always helpful in improving the customer experience at Digital Storm.

Regards,

Rajeev Kuruppu

Product Development

And there you have it. While I still have my reservations, at the very least DigitalStorm is willing to stand behind the overclocks on their Enix line and I'm not sure how much more we can really ask. Overclocking enthusiasts should be well aware of the long-term stability issues that frequently crop up, and as they point out they felt a bit more voltage would be best over the long haul. If you're comfortable doing the tweaking on your own, that's fine, but for a vendor that doesn't want to see flaky system returns after a few months we understand their approach.

Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption Conclusion: Too Hot to Handle
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Abix - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    Noise results?
  • crimson117 - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    Is a genius.
  • demonbug - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    Heh, I just watched that with my son the other day... great article title.
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    Still looks like a trash can... now with a red lid!
  • zero2dash - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    And a bad spraypaint job to boot! o.O

    Granted I'm not a modder extraordinaire, but that paint job is really bad; you can see splotches all over the place on the black. They either rushed it or they didn't do even coats.
  • TIGGAH - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    I think those splotches are finger/hand prints. I have the silver version and my daughter pawed it over with her grubby hands and I had to scrub it to get the metal to look even again.
  • DigitalStorm - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    @zero2dash.

    The black is actually just finger prints on the metal surface of the chassis. We only had the red trim pieces painted. I hope that clears it up. =]

    Warm Regards,
    Harjit
    Digital Storm
  • Omid.M - Thursday, May 12, 2011 - link

    Because of that awesome title.
  • xxtypersxx - Friday, May 13, 2011 - link

    Great Review.

    This system is very similar component wise to the 2600k/P8P67M-PRO system I built at launch except that I am running 2 gtx 470's. I can confirm the issues they describe with voltage stability, in order to ensure vcore never dropped below 1.39v while folding at 4.7ghz (it will blue screen if it does) I had to use a +.135v offset which would shoot the cpu-z voltage up to 1.48v if it was at full speed without a load. However, just a couple days ago I upgraded to a leaked 0708 bios dated early may (found it in a forum thread, google brings it right up) and the LLC is now rock solid. I only get a one increment warble now and it actually brings the board on part with the good full atx overclockers. While I don't expect you to upgrade to unofficially released bios versions for your review, I do recommend this for anyone running one of these boards.

    Still, seeing a boutique comfortable warrantying those sort of voltages makes me feel better about pushing mine a bit more...
  • DigitalStorm - Friday, May 13, 2011 - link

    That's awesome news. I'll share this with our team and hopefully Asus will publish an official BIOS update that will help achieve a stable overclock at lower offset settings.

    Cheers,
    Harjit

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now