Gateway ID49: Mixing the Bag
by Dustin Sklavos on September 23, 2010 2:46 AM ESTCan It Hit Gateway's Six Hour Claim?
Gateway claims a six hour battery life on their site for the ID49C, no small feat for a unit that boasts mainstream parts. To be fair, they do have a couple of aces up their sleeve: the GeForce GT 330M's Optimus technology allows it to power off completely while on the battery and let the Intel HD integrated graphics do the work, and the notebook can shut off power to the optical drive.
Also included is power optimization software that threatened to ruin our benchmarking sessions: with this software installed, even if you set the screen not to dim or turn off, it still will. The best part? There's no control panel to tweak those settings! Hot on the heels of the dismal keyboard comes my next pet peeve with the ID49C: software that takes control of the computer completely out of your hands and leaves you no recourse other than to uninstall it. Mercifully, this software is separate from the software that handles turning off the optical drive while running on the battery.
Well, if you leave it completely idle and don't touch anything, you can scrape nearly six hours out of the battery, and that's not too shabby. Once you start using the ID49C for other tasks, the battery life becomes somewhat less exciting. Internet usage knocks it down to a decent if unexciting 216 minutes, or about three and a half hours. That's not bad at all, but it's not great either, and it places the ID49C near the bottom of our charts.
Things do pick up when HD playback is introduced, where the ID49C is able to cull nearly three hours of running time: more than enough for most movies unless you were aching to watch The Lord of the Rings on a 14" screen. In fact, under this metric the ID49C ranks near the top of our charts and is only bested by notebooks that have the privilege of bigger batteries.
When you talk about battery life and power consumption, just how much a notebook needs to run the fan is introduced. Units like the Lenovo ThinkPad X100e will let the processor run uncomfortably hot to keep fan speed and noise down, so how does the ID49C fare?
To test thermals, we set the ID49C to loop 3DMark06 for more than an hour and left HWMonitor running in the background. There's a lot of information to break down here.
First, the good news is it's nice to see a notebook that doesn't threaten to cook the GPU: the 71C full load temperature for the 330M is actually pretty good comparatively speaking. If you remember, the ID49C also keeps the memory and hard disk under the palm rests, and while the hard disk isn't very fast, thermals remained excellent: a top temperature of 33C is fantastic, and you could install a faster 7200 RPM disk without worrying about making your palms sweat.
The bad news is that the processor is peaking awfully high. 92C is very hot, near spec for the chip. Fan noise when the system is under load is a little obtrusive although not as bad as some of the other units (the Studio 17 can get pretty loud, for example.) The real thermal issue is where that heat localizes. The exhaust is located on the left side of the unit, right under the keyboard, and the surface of the notebook can get uncomfortably hot. This hot surface is also perilously close to the WASD keys, meaning that while you're gaming you may find your left hand getting hot after prolonged gaming sessions. When the system is idling or not doing much, it's fine, but place a gaming load on it and it starts to become a real issue.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
43 Comments
View All Comments
xype - Thursday, September 23, 2010 - link
"MBP's screen are decent, but no where near the best in term of "high-res" and "uniformity" and "view angel"."Erm, ever heared of "context"? We're talking consumer laptops here, not $4k tablets or whatever. Obviously you could get a better panel if you spent $20k on a laptop...
"just because you are in "lame-hipster-web-app-and-design business" doesn't mean you need a good screen."
Actually it does mean that, at least if you're dealing with the design side of things (which I do).
But, yeah, tablets are a different story—the iPad has an IPS screen, too. Doesn't mean anything in the context of consumer 13-17" laptops, though—which is what I am interested in.
seanleeforever - Thursday, September 23, 2010 - link
i did not take it out of context. review your own post and think before posting.most would agree that MBP is not a cheap consumer laptop. it is their pro line and cost 1.8k to 4.1k. so exactly how did i take it out of context? (i did not consider the 13 inch because their screen is just as average as any panel in Dell/HP, their 15/17 are the only ones using 6-bit TN with 3 color LED backlit, as an apple PRO owner that does web design, you should at least know that, right?)
out of the three examples i pointed out, the HP dreamcolor is NOT a tablet. it is on their elitebook and it is 10 bit IPS screen. it is on their 15 and 17 inch elitebooks, and that is exactly within the context of 13~17" laptop, which is what YOU interested in.
allow me to say this: LCD screen, even regular TN screens look pretty damn nice under ideal condition. but what separately pro/business from consumer is 1: price tag 2: performance under all conditions.
lastly, i did say Apple screens are noticeably better than average screen, but to say it is the BEST is simply a display of your ignorance. it is the same part used in other laptops and perform the same. i fail to see how screen is the reason for you to justify your choice.
JarredWalton - Thursday, September 23, 2010 - link
For the record, the 13.3" MBP has a good screen as well (just no matte option). The regular MacBook on the other hand has a crappy ~200:1 contrast ratio. We'll have something of a comparative review in the near future for some fun.... :-)xype - Friday, September 24, 2010 - link
"most would agree that MBP is not a cheap consumer laptop. it is their pro line and cost 1.8k to 4.1k"Yeah, except that the standard configurations (which is what most people buy) are 1.2 to 2.3K. If a "pro line" starts at 1.2 then that means that the people's expectations of laptops and computers in general got pretty weird lately. And I guess the 3k HP EliteBook is, what, space technology?
"lastly, i did say Apple screens are noticeably better than average screen, but to say it is the BEST is simply a display of your ignorance"
Can you point me to where I claimed they were the best?
" i fail to see how screen is the reason for you to justify your choice."
It's not the sole reason, but a very important one none the less. If you fail to see how it might be a reason to justify a laptop, feel free to get the Gateway and enjoy the shitty screen.
Ivan Karkour - Monday, September 27, 2010 - link
What happened to reading what the person comments? Seanleefore mentions laptops too, and he mentions a good selection. Talk about disregarding what the person says..Seanleefore, although quite biased, mentioned the Dell Studio XPS line, along with the M4500. They all have the resembling screen as the mac book pros have. It's true.
Look for yourself. You can grab the Studio XPS 16 for about 1,200 dollars, and recieve the Core i5 450, an ATI HD 5730, (which whoops the hell out of a MBP 13" graphics card), and all the rest of same specs with HD audio, and 2 year service---with the SAME screen.
The only downfall---not as light as the 13" MBP, and not as battery efficient. Oh, and of course the sturdiness of that mac book is pretty much kick ass. --but there. Seanleefore called you out, and he was correct. Sorry.
You speak of apple as if they are affordable. Maybe to you, but 1,300 dollar laptops, ( excluding tax), that rise all the way to 2,000 dollars isn't technically consumer friendly for the majority of people either. Although, you are right about 4,000 dollars being a bit steep. ha ha
Aircraft123 - Thursday, September 23, 2010 - link
The notebooks that come the closest to competing with the MBPs would have to be the HP ENVY series. I have the Envy 15 and it has the best LCD panel I have ever seen on a notebook. 1920x1080 AND an anti glare coating.They get much flak for running hot, however, the MBPs do too.
I also get a Mobility Radeon 5830 graphics card, a Core i5, 4GB RAM and a very well designed and built magnesium/aluminum chassis for much less than the MBP.
Don't get me wrong, Apple makes some very impressive hardware and the Envys are not without their faults.
If you are looking for a PC that has a chance of competing with Apple for less money, they are worth taking a look at.
kmmatney - Friday, September 24, 2010 - link
I had a look at the Envy 15. Seems nice, except that there is no internal optical drive, which is kind of odd for a 15" laptop.You can get a slot load DVD with the Dell Studio 15, along with a 1080P true-life display, 6 GB of RAM, back-lit keyboard for $1025, which is less than the ENVY, although the video card is not as good. So I'd recommend the Dell studio line also as a good overall laptop.
Roland00 - Friday, September 24, 2010 - link
while you can still order these products from the HP website, the HP envy 15 and 13 inch are winding down. Pretty much from suppliers that aren't HP you will only find clearance models or refurbished options.The HP envy 14 and 17 inch have replaced the 13 and 15 inch. The HP envy 14 and 17 inch have dvd/blu ray options.
The HP envy uses a metal case and has a much better video card.
Ivan Karkour - Monday, September 27, 2010 - link
Your definitely right about the Envy, but no slot loading drive :( Kinda lame for a 15", huh? Although I think there are the newer lines that came out. I believe they have slot loading.Hey, don't forget about the Dell Studio XPS 16. That's a kick ass piece of machinery. --and hey, a slot loading drive. ha ha
Although, it doesn't compare to the Envy with the 5830. The XPS has the 5730. You can get a higher grade one, but more money is needed of course.
Minion4Hire - Thursday, September 23, 2010 - link
Okay. I'm not going to come in here and sing Gateway's praises or pretend that this is a fantastic laptop, but I think your negativity is a little overzealous Dustin. I have used both the ID49 and ID59 series and did not view it nearly as negatively as yourself (certainly not so emphatically anyhow)This is a mainstream laptop. You yourself make note of this fact. This is a laptop being produced for the masses. MOST people want a computer that performs well (even if they don't quite know where said performance comes from or what they're paying for) but at the same time a lot of people want something stylish. Gateway is clearly trying to meet the consumer halfway; they're offering an above-entry-level product with a higher-end STYLE at a reasonable price. Their product page reeks of this: "Metal-like keys match the slender and stylish profile of the arctic silver cover and make typing an experience of ultimate smoothness. A cool-blue illuminated touchpad creates an inviting effect that draws your fingers". Sorry, but the average consumer will eat that up.
Speaking of the average consumer, most are not very picky about their keyboard, they haven't the slightest clue about screen quality, and do not use navigation keys of any kind. The AVERAGE consumer deletes highlighted text before typing, are confused and/or are barely aware of Fn keys, and wildly whirl their mouse cursor around the screen in an attempt to click "Google Search" instead of just pressing enter. So for these people dedicated volume keys are a good thing, and anorexic arrow keys which double as navigation aren't a detriment. The keyboard flex could and should definitely be improved, but at least it doesn't have a more annoying layout; small backspace key, the left Fn key on the outside of the Ctrl key, etc...
I'm not saying that the average consumer doesn't deserve a better product, but at the higher pricepoint required to offer those consumers that better product they will invariably end up looking at a different, cheaper model of laptop. I think it's hard to offer an "inbetween" laptop when the lower and higher ends of the market seem to be alienating each other more and more, so in some ways I think Gateway has hit their target audience beautifully; it's just not the Anandtech audience. If I want a well built laptop I'll buy Lenovo. If I want an inexpensive not-complete-piece-of-crap for my parents, or their parents, then I would look at mainstream offerings like this Gateway.