Final Words

For those who have a need for it, the OCZ RevoDrive performs very well. For a little more than the cost a single SandForce drive you get much better performance; as much as double depending on the situation.

Most desktop users would find it difficult to realize a measurable performance difference between the RevoDrive and a single Vertex 2. While the jump from a HDD to SSD is significant enough in most day to day tasks to tell the difference, application launch times and most conventional desktop uses won’t be affected by the RevoDrive. This product falls into that category of if you have to ask why, it’s not for you. Thankfully at OCZ's aggressive price points, you may not really have to ask why.

As far as the architecture of the drive goes, there doesn’t appear to be any downside to OCZ’s PCI-X to PCIe solution. The Sil3124 controller does appear to be, on average, slower than Intel's ICH10R however not by a degree that would be noticeable in most real world scenarios. It all boils down to price. If OCZ is able to deliver a single 120GB RevoDrive at $369.99 this is going to be a very tempting value. Cheaper than a pair of Vertex 2s in RAID, you could get twice the performance of a single SandForce drive for only $20 more. That’s huge. While OCZ tells me that at least initially the Revo will be cheaper than a pair of smaller Vertex 2s in RAID, you'll have to keep an eye on pricing before making any purchasing decisions. It's really the cost that makes the RevoDrive so appetizing.

The kinks I encountered would obviously need resolving first. If a selling point of the drive is to be a simplified solution for those who want more performance than a single SSD, it needs to work like a black box. While I appreciate OCZ allowing the end user the insight into what’s going on with the RAID array, I want to see something that just works like a normal SSD. I’ll give it another look once mass production hardware is available and see if these lingering issues have been resolved.

While SandForce’s architecture is particularly resilient, I would encourage OCZ to continue to push for TRIM support on its PCIe SSDs. I’ve been using SandForce drives without TRIM under OS X for the past few months now without any sign of slowdown. Even for the most strenuous desktop workloads I don’t believe the lack of TRIM would be noticeable on the RevoDrive. It’s the corner case scenarios that I’m most concerned about. If you are too, then waiting for some sort of a TRIM tool makes sense.

Ultimately I believe there is a future in these PCIe based SSDs. If we ever find ourselves in a situation with 6Gbps SATA where we are bandwidth limited, turning to PCIe as an alternative for high speed storage might make a lot of sense. OCZ showed us that it's possible to drive the cost down, now it's just a matter of improving controller and NAND performance.

No TRIM, No Idle Garbage Collection
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrBrownSound - Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - link

    Should I be worried putting my OS on this drive? Also I have two steamy hot graphics cards, will a fan be needed?
  • diqster - Sunday, September 26, 2010 - link

    While you claim these PCIe SSDs are aimed at the enterprise market (they are), you didn't hit very many enterprise benchmarks or concerns. I'd like to see these things reviewed in any PCIe SSD review:

    1) Form factor. Can they fit in a half height or half length PCI slot? Putting this in tandem with spinning metal HD's in a 1U server would be ideal. Flashcache setups come to mind. The previous OCZ offerings failed miserably in this department as they're as long as some GPU cards.

    2) You mentioned RAID controller, but no mention of a BBWC. A BBWC (like on the old OCZ R-Drive) would drastically speed up random writes. Enterprises are looking at flash to solve 2 problems, either random reads or random writes.

    3) Enterprises don't care much about sequential I/O here. Very few things in a datacenter environment would use sequential I/O. For things like databases or key value stores, it's all random. Sure, video editing is sequential but it's neither enterprise (in most senses) nor is it very popular (number of DB's installed worldwide dwarfs number of video editors).

    4) Addressing write lifetimes. Consumers can swap and replace these cards one at a time if they fail every 2 years. Doing that over installations of hundreds or thousands of these cards is rather hard. People want to know if they'll last. Again, a BBWC would help address some of these issues -- only letting the last write of 100 writes to a block go through.

    If you want to be taken seriously, start reviewing stuff in an enterprise manner. As of now, these are consumer-based reviews of enterprise gear.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now