ASUS Maximus III Extreme - P55 for $349
by Rajinder Gill on April 26, 2010 1:32 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Testbed Setup
Testbed Setup Overclocking / Benchmark Testbed |
|
Processor |
1 x Intel i5-870 ES CPU, 2.93GHz, 8 Threads, 8MB Cache Intel i5-750 Retail, 2.66GHz, 4 Threads, 8MB Cache Intel I7 920 D0, 2.66GHz, 8 Threads, 8MB Cache |
CPU Voltage | Various |
Cooling | Intel air cooler, Heatkiller 3.0 waterblock, PA120.2 radiator and DDC ultra pump (with Petra top). 1/2 ID tubing for watercooling. |
Power Supply | Corsair HX950 |
Memory |
Corsair Dominator GT 8-8-8-24 2200MHz 4GB kit (X2 for 8GB) G.Skill Perfect Storm 8-8-8-24 2200MHz 4GB kit |
Memory Settings | Various |
Video Cards | MSI 275 Lightning (stock clocks) |
Video Drivers | nVidia 195.62 WHQL |
Hard Drive |
Western Digital 7200RPM 1TB SATA 3/Gbps 32MB OCZ Vertex 120GB SSD |
Optical Drives | Plextor PX-B900A, Toshiba SD-H802A |
Case |
Open Test Bed - Dimastech Benching Station Lian-Li V2110 |
Operating System | Windows 7 64-bit |
. |
We utilized memory kits from Corsair and G.Skill to verify memory compatibility on our test boards. Our OS and primary applications are loaded on the OCZ Vertex 120GB SSD drive and our games operate off the WD Caviar Black 1TB drive. We did a clean install of the OS and applications for each motherboard.
We used Intel's stock cooler for the stock comparison testing, while water-cooling via the superlative Heat Killer 3.0 water block was utilized for overclocking. For graphics duty, we used MSI's 275 Lighting GPUs to provide performance comparisons between boards and to test SLI scaling in our gaming benchmarks.
For our test results we set up each board as closely as possible in regards to memory timings. Otherwise all other settings are left on auto. The P55 utilized 8GB of DDR3, while the X58 platform contained 6GB. The P55 and X58 DDR3 timings were set to 7-7-7-20 1T at DDR3-1600 for the i7-920 and i7-870 processors at both stock and overclocked CPU settings.
We used DDR3-1333 6-6-6-18 1T timings for the i5-750 stock setup for all system benchmarks (non gaming tests) as DDR3-1600 is not natively supported at a stock BCLK setting of 133.
Power Consumption
Our power consumption testing utilizes the same batch of components under similar circumstances in a bid to monitor variances between idle and CPU load conditions. We install the vendor supplied power saving utilities on each board and enable power saving modes that don't involve any kind of underclocking or CPU core frequency modulation in order to run an apples to apples comparison.
ATX PSU switching losses are absent from our figures because we monitor power consumption directly at the DC rails of the PSU. These figures measure only the CPU, motherboard and memory DC power draw and exclude any other peripherals such as 12V ATX power draw for the graphics card, or any power for case cooling fans and hard drives etc. Actual AC power consumption for the motherboard will be anywhere from 15~40% higher than these figures depending upon the efficiency of your power supply.
The M3E holds a 10 watt advantage at idle, but seems to draw more power than the EVGA Classified 200 when under full load.
22 Comments
View All Comments
Nickel020 - Tuesday, April 27, 2010 - link
Thanks for the reply Raja!I think you got me wrong though, I did not mean to say your benchmarking was sloppy, I meant to say that I fully trust your numbers! AT is one of the few sites that I trust to make a sanity check of their benchmark numbers before posting them^^
The numbers did not really make sense to me before because I did not know what you just explained, but now they do make sense, thanks again :)
Rajinder Gill - Tuesday, April 27, 2010 - link
HiNo worries. When I first saw this it had me scratching my head (and other areas of my body). You caught me at a time where I was in an overly self-protective mood (gotta get some sleep)..lol
later
Raja