ASUS G73Jh: Today's Top Gaming Laptop
by Jarred Walton on April 17, 2010 2:25 AM ESTG73Jh: Midrange Gaming Comparison
As stated, we're also providing a comparison with some of the faster midrange laptops that we've tested just to give you an idea of the difference. While the G73Jh costs twice as much as the Acer 5740G, it's only a few hundred dollars more than the Alienware M11x configuration we tested and 50% more than the ASUS N61J. All three of those will easily beat the G73Jh senseless when it comes to battery life comparisons, but for gaming there's another massive performance gap.
The Acer 5740G is the fastest midrange laptop we've tested (except for Batman where the M11x just edges it out); meanwhile the G73Jh manages to double (and often more than double) the performance of the 5740G in most titles. Running at midrange settings, there are a few titles where the gap is quite a bit smaller; Crysis: Warhead only shows a 31% advantage for the G73Jh at Mainstream settings, Empire: Total War shows a 52% advantage at Medium, and Left 4 Dead 2 is 60% faster with all settings other than antialiasing maxed out. At every other test setting the difference ranges from just over 90% (Empire: TW Very High) to 140% (Mass Effect 2). The Acer 5740G is no gaming slouch, and with a 1366x768 native resolution it really doesn't need anything more potent than the HD 5650. However, if you want to run games at higher quality settings and you want to have a 1080p LCD, you'll definitely want something as powerful as the HD 5870.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
72 Comments
View All Comments
anishannayya - Monday, April 19, 2010 - link
Just though you might want to know.JarredWalton - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Added a new link to a laptop drive. They're hard to find in stock! :-)layman_user - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Can you guys also test the laptops for thermals? My friend bought a laptop recently and it "burns" when running games. Can you include some tests in your analysis to measure temperatures of chassis and cpu? It would be nice to know the "cool" laptops out thereJarredWalton - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Page 2 has the temperature information. If the exhaust is cool and the noise levels are low, it's pretty safe to say that the CPU and GPU aren't running hot.layman_user - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Thanks Jered. Can you guys do a comparision of 5 popular laptops for thermals? It would be interesting to see which laptop out there is the "coolest" .. Thermals is a huge factor these days and we hardly see any comparisions across notebooks for thermalsjfmeister - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Sorry to come in late, I haven't gone all the way through the comments, but I would really like to see a MSI GX640 Review or at least some comparison. It seems to be a great compromise in size, battery life & performance.Thanks!
FesterSilently - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Um...what about the Toshiba Qosmio Q870?http://www.google.com/products/catalog?q=qosmio+q8...
Same price (~$1,400), slightly different specs:
Intel Core i7 720qm
2 x 2GB PC 10666
nVidia 360m (1GB GDDR5)
1680 x 945 native resolution*
1 x Hitachi 500GB HDD (7200rpm)
Mitsumi Blu-Ray burner
I mention this as an alternative/comparison gaming laptop...well, mainly because it IS! ;-D
I'm curious as to how the 360m compares (in general) to the mobile 5870, though...DX11 aside.
*I understand the (aesthetic and practical) difference between 1920 x 1080 and 1680 x 945, but I think of it as a benefit: a) that's some TINY goddamned font, etc. on that hi-res/tiny 17" screen, vs. b) better GPU performance because of the slightly lower resolution on the Toshiba, neh?
JarredWalton - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
It's not just the resolution that changed, though. That LCD may be a good contrast ratio or it may not. By and large, 95% of LCD panels for laptops right now are crap, so the odds are against it. For $1400, it's not a bad laptop, and the Blu-ray drive makes it a viable alternative. As a gaming laptop, though, the G73Jh is clearly the superior choice based on specs alone. Even if the LCD is the same quality, I'd still go for the ASUS.As far as performance, the GT360M is a 96 SP part with 128-bit RAM, so the GTX 280M in the Clevo W870CU is going to perform about 30% faster at a guess. Whether the particular unit has GDDR5 or GDDR3 is going to be pretty important... The Toshiba has 1GB GDDR5, so all told it's about the same bandwidth as the GTX 280M but still nowhere near as much shader processing power. It will be slower than the GTX 260M as well, and we have results for that on 3DMark at least (page 6).
FesterSilently - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
Interesting (and, if you hadn't guessed, I *own* said Qosmio, and, I lovelovelove it...except for the dark, murky screen...you are correct) - thanks for the reply, sir.jjcpa - Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - link
I am not a gamer and use laptop for photo editing (photoshop). Is G73 a good buy for my purpose? The spec and price is very attractive. Only concern is display. Other laptops meet my need are Dell M6500/M17, Lenovo W701, HP Elitebook 8740p, but cost for them over $3000 if the displays are RGBLED or IPS. The only option left in my price range is Dell XPS 16 (1645). But XPS 16 with RGBLED and similar spec as G73 are over $2000. And I can get G73 at $1550 Canadian dollar. I saw your comparison for display. Except gamut, compared to XPS 16, G73's display is ok. I would like to hear your opinion in this area.My current laptop is Lenono T61 with WUXGA. Any opinion how this compared to G73's screen
thank you very much