Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 Layout



Considering the limited board space, Gigabyte did a very good job fitting all of the peripherals onto this board. About the only negatives we can think of is the continued inclusion of the floppy drive port, lack of passive cooling for the MOSFET area, and only two fan headers. The board does support CrossFireX operation although we highly recommend against this setup as the second PCIe x16 slot is actually an x4 electrical slot running off the P55 chipset with performance suffering up to 30% depending on the choice of video card and game.

The UD2 features Gigabyte's UltraDurable 3 technology that features their 2oz. copper based PCB, solid capacitors, low RDS(on) MOSFETs, and ferrite core chokes.



Gigabyte utilizes a high quality four-phase plus one PWM setup on this board. The CPU area is open for the most part and will accommodate larger coolers like the Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme. Large push/pull coolers like the Vigor Monsoon III LT will block the first DIMM slot and potentially can interfere with the first PCIe x16 slot.

We originally thought additional airflow across the MOSFETs would be required to ensure 24/7 stability when overclocking. However, the MOSFETs only reached 58.6C under full load with our i7/860 operating at 4.2GHz. We ran the board for 200 hours in with this overclock setting with the case fans turned off. This left just the Corsair 750HX providing air exhaust capabilities.



The IDE port, 24-pin ATX power connector, and the four DIMM slots are located in the lower right hand corner of the board. This board supports dual channel memory configurations and 16GB of DDR3 memory when using 4GB DIMMS. Installing the memory with a video card inserted in the first slot is difficult but not impossible.



There are five (blue) SATA 3Gb/s ports provided by the P55 chipset that support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10. The sixth port available on the P55 (under the blue heatsink) is utilized on the I/O panel for eSATA. Gigabyte includes the JMicron JMB363 3Gb/s SATA chip that drives the two white SATA ports and provides IDE support. The front panel header, two USB headers, and the IEEE 1394a header are located at the edge of the board.



Gigabyte includes two PCIe x16 slots (x16 operation for the first slot, x4 operation for the second slot) and two PCI slots. The first PCI slot will be unavailable when utilizing a dual slot video card.



Last but not least is the I/O panel. We have ten USB 2.0 ports (total of fourteen on the board), combination PS/2 port, single eSATA port from the P55, IEEE 1394a port offered by the TI TSB43AB23 chipset, Gigabit Ethernet LAN port via the Realtek RTL8111D chipset, optical out/coaxial out S/PDIF ports, and the audio panel that provides 8-channel audio output via the Realtek ALC 888B HD audio codec.



Tech

One of the highlighted features that Gigabyte implemented in the GA-P55M-UD2 motherboard is the Ultra Durable 3 technology. Ultra Durable 3 features lower ESR solid capacitors, lower RDS(on) MOSFETs, and ferrite core chokes. Gigabyte now rates the longevity of the solid capacitors at 50,000 hours or approximately 6 years of continuous use.

The second major improvement cited by Gigabyte in their Ultra Durable 3 design is the introduction of a 2-ounce copper PCB for both the Power and Ground layers compared to the typical 1-ounce layers found in most consumer boards. Gigabyte claims this technology offers substantially lower system temperatures, superior energy efficiency, and improved overclocking. We can verify the temperature and energy efficiency claims; at least compared to other boards in this price sector at idle conditions.

DPC Latency


We get a lot of requests for DPC latency results on each board we test. The latency variations between manufacturers utilizing the same chipset vary more than one might imagine. In the past, Gigabyte has had problems in this area when others did not. We are happy to report that it appears those problems are thing of the past. All of our P55 boards so far have exhibited the same behavior in this benchmark. Our test used the Core i5/750 at stock settings with 8GB of memory installed with timings set to 6-6-6-18 at DDR3-1333.

Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 Features Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 Software
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • yehuda - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    Slow POST is a minor annoyance, but it adds up as part of the computing experience IMO. I don't get why Gigabyte is so slow compared to other brands like MSI and ASRock. Just getting the video signal online takes about 4 seconds here (commenting on G31 and G41-based boards). It feels like a 486 until the OS takes over.
  • yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    Much more interested in the MSI uATX board and the higher-level Gigabyte one that actually has all the features on it. These two may be entry-level but they also skip some features most discerning enthusiasts would want.
  • Gary Key - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    The MSI just arrived, they were late to market for that one. The P55M-UD4 is coming up shortly, but it does not clock any better than the UD2. ;) The lack of passive MOSFET cooling was not a problem on either board under full load. The bigger problem is that the 4+1 PWM setup is not going to handle high current draws. The UD4, GD45, and MIII GENE boards are designed for that audience.
  • MadMan007 - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    That's simple enough to understand in a basic way but could you elaborate on what *high* current means, and what the difference in ovreclocking might be? In the context of 24/7 overclocks as you go on about in this article would be best...you seem to imply in the article that the UD2 will be as good as any at 24/7-type settings but it would be nice to clarify when 'high' current is an advantage.
  • yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    Cool, looking forward to that UD4 review =)
    I wonder if the extra features will be considered worth the price difference, although it sounds like you do not believe so.

    The onboard audio is one area i've heard several complaints for cheapest Gigabyte boards compared to the mid-level and upper-tier boards.
  • MadMan007 - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    What exactly were the issues or differences in the audio? Features or sound quality?
  • yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    at the moment i can't find either of the reviews i read a couple weeks ago, but both stated sound quality issues with the onboard solution, which is a lower grade than what is included on the other boards.
  • philosofool - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    I have one of these boards and the sound is great. I'm listening to Little Milton (Grits Ain't Groceries) right now: I can hear every horn, bass string, cymbal crash like I'm sitting on stage. Okay, maybe that's an exaggeration, but there's nothing wrong with the audio on this board.
  • yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    To be more specific, there are reviews on other sites mentioning the particularly crappy onboard audio solution on the UD2 compared to the UD4, and there's also the lack of cooling on the VRMs.

    On the upside, sure, it uses slightly less operating power, and that can be important to users interested in uATX, but overall I'd rather spend another $20 or whatever to get the UD4 with better cooling and audio (and whatever else it adds).

  • yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    Awesome work with the review, Gary. I do wish the uATX boards would stop carrying legacy ports like others have noted. Floppy is definitely archaic, IDE should be the next item tossed, and PCI could probably go as well. FireWire is also something 99% of us could live without on a uATX board that offers USB and eSATA.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now