Gaming Performance

The gaming performance of Intel’s basic Atom platform is a joke. I’ll put aside debates of whether or not you would want to game on an Atom for a moment. World of Warcraft does a great job of straddling the line between casual and hardcore gaming and thus makes a good candidate for looking at gaming performance of Ion vs. Intel’s standard Atom platform.

I tested by running through a small outdoor section at 800 x 600 (24-bit color, no AA) using WoW’s built in “Good” visual quality settings. This is the same chart from the Pentium 4 section but I'm repeating it here so you have something to look at while we discuss the gaming potential of Ion:

World of Warcraft - 800 x 600 - Good Quality

The Ion platform managed just under 18 fps, which wasn’t incredibly smooth to play on but it was close. If I dropped the settings even lower I could easily get a smooth experience. The Intel D945GCLF2 managed a whopping 3 fps. I didn’t even bother benchmarking the single core version; I’m not that fond of single digits.

Most modern FPS games will show worse performance than what we just saw under WoW. Far Cry 2 and Crysis Warhead will give you under 7 fps for Zotac’s Ion platform, but other, more mainstream titles will perform similarly if not better.

I still maintain that the Atom CPU is not fast enough for a good gaming experience on far too many modern titles, but to NVIDIA’s credit, the Ion platform does make it fast enough in games that it otherwise wouldn’t be.

PAR2, WinRAR, Sony Vegas, Sorenson & Excel Performance Power Consumption & Final Words
Comments Locked

93 Comments

View All Comments

  • ahmshaegar - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    Greater power consumption = more heat. Where's that energy going to go?
  • marshylucas - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    You were faster, I was about to reply something similar.

    Thumbs up for the fanless design!
  • Jeffk464 - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    Yes, but my laptop is very quiet, even with being severely limited on space for a heat sink and fan. If you had more rooms to put a large heat sink on it with a large low rpm fan, I think it would be near silent.
  • trabpukcip - Friday, May 15, 2009 - link

    A laptop does not make the best HTPC though. Connectivity is too limited and is generally inconvenient.
  • GeorgeH - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    "a single Gigabit Ethernet port (just like on the Intel boards)"

    Actually, only the D945GCLF2 has Gigabit Ethernet. The D945GCLF is stuck with 10/100, which is kind of a deal killer for me.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    Thanks for the correction :)

    Take care,
    Anand
  • DrLudvig - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    I'm confused here, most places it says that the hole ION thing is a 9400 chip, while some other places, like now here, says 9300?
    What is it really?
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    The 9300 and 9400 are the same chip, the difference is GPU clock. Take a look at the table on this page:

    http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3432">http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3432

    The GF9300 on the Zotac board actually runs a bit slower than the stock GeForce 9300. It runs its core at 450MHz and its shaders at 1.1GHz instead of 450/1.2.

    Take care,
    Anand
  • Badkarma - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    Anand,

    Can you please confirm/deny if the Zotac Ion boards support wake-on-usb? The Zotac 9300 mini-itx board does not support wake-on-usb and therefore powering the system on from standby from the MCE remote does not work without physical workarounds.

    Thanks.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Tuesday, May 12, 2009 - link

    I'm out of the office right now but I'll try it this weekend :) Drop me an email to remind me if you don't see something by the end of next week :)

    Take care,
    Anand

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now