General System Performance

Winstones 2004 and the PCMark products provide a reasonable look at overall system performance (minus games). Honestly, any modern dual core system is basically "fast enough" when it comes to these tasks. Anyone looking to buy an XPS system would have to be interested in gaming, or at least some more graphics intensive applications, or else they would be far better off ditching the high-powered graphics chip. Still, let's see how the systems compare.

System Performance - WinStones 2004


System Performance - WinStones 2004


System Performance - Futuremark


System Performance - Futuremark


Encoding Performance - AutoGK 1.96


Encoding Performance - AutoGK 1.96


The M1710 delivers an impressive start, basically winning five of the six tests. The only benchmark that it doesn't win is Business Winstones, where it finishes last place. That particular test has very little that will take advantage of multiple processors, and of all the tests we'll run today, it represents applications that are most dependent on user input. PCMark05 has the M1710 in the middle of the pack, but the faster graphics cards of the desktop systems are the only thing keeping it from a first-place finish.

Test Setup Synthetic Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • ElFenix - Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - link

    'since' indicates passage of time, while 'because' indicates some form of causation. So, rather than, 'Since this is the very first notebook...,' the sentence would read, 'Because this is the very first notebook....'

    Fairly disappointing that this notebook will have a problem with watching many DVDs. Considering the size and weight it's amazing that there isn't a larger capacity battery.

    17" LCDs must suck down a ton of juice.
  • Trisped - Friday, April 21, 2006 - link

    http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/...">Actually it can be used both ways.http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/...
  • yacoub - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link

    so wait, why was it unable to run FEAR or Quake4?
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link

    I will be running those in part two; delaying the article for another day or two just for those two applications didn't seem to make much sense, especially since there's so much to say about this laptop that it would have ended up a monolithic single review. Heck, the laptop can even run Oblivion at a reasonable speed even at 1920x1200 -- but there are still some areas in the game that really kill performance.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link

    I should mention that part of the reason some benchmarks weren't run yet is because they require more manual intervention. Quake 4 used to work okay with my automated script, but with the latest beta patch it always crashes on exit. FEAR, Lost Coast, Oblivion, Call of Duty 2... all of those require you to sit down in front of the system and manually execute each benchmark. When you're trying to benchmark several systems at once, especially with a looming deadline, that can be problematic.
  • yacoub - Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - link

    ah ok, thanks :)
  • DarkForceRising - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link

    Is this tested right out of the box, or was some software disabled/removed? I read an article recently about one of the XPS desktops, and it had major issues playing games with the included software. The games that did play had a major hit in performance.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link

    I did disable/uninstall some software, chief among those being McAfee Internet Security. Many benchmarks like Winstones and SysMark basically require a "clean" OS if you want to have any chance of them running without difficulties. In fact, I couldn't get SysMark to complete either, because one of the scripts kept on failing. There are still quite a few icons in the system tray -- more than I'd really like to have there -- but none of them seem to really affect performance.
  • Trisped - Friday, April 21, 2006 - link

    You should probable include a disclamer them. Otherwise readers will be upset when they have the product and it doesn't perform up to you specs.

    Personally I find it easier to build a custom desktop then remove software from premade systems due to all the "optimizations" done. Plus, since it is a Dell you can't just wipe it and start with a fresh install (since they didn't include the drivers so you have to recover it back to system shipped status).

    While I am at it, I would like to see a comparision with a similarly priced desktop (to keep it in perspective) and one of the new mac desktop and laptops. Since both of the macs are basied on similar laptop tech they should make a good comparison.
  • Odeen - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link

    What's up with the narrow 87-key keyboard layout? The laptop is a sizeable 15.5" across, which is enough room to include the regular 87 keys plus a separate numeric keypad.

    Not everyone plays WASD-controlled FPS'es on a gaming laptop, y'know, a numeric keypad helps with a game such as the Civilization series.

    Granted, there are certain "economies of scale" that comes with recycling a keyboard part from the budget-ish 6000-series Inspiron, but when every other part of the laptop is stamped with a glowing XPS logo, and the machine costs $3400, it's only fair to splurge on a more functional keyboard that takes advantage of the widescreen aspect of the notebook. Fujitsu does it on their 17" laptops that cost far less than this XPS.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now