ASRock Industrial has been a key player in the ultra-compact form-factor (UCFF) PC space over the last few years. They have managed to release 4"x4" systems based on the latest AMD and Intel platforms well ahead of other vendors. The company's NUC(S) BOX-1300 series was launched along with Intel's introduction of Raptor Lake-P in January. The NUCS BOX-1360P/D4 was made available in early February because it broadly carried over the same board components and DDR4 support of the previous generation (NUC BOX-1200 series) product.

The NUC BOX-13xxP/D5 series was introduced in January, but has taken a couple of quarters to appear in retail. The system supports DDR5 SODIMMs and uses a Hayden Bridge retimer on the Thunderbolt 4 port in order to enable USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 support in the front panel's Type-C ports.

Our review of the NUCS BOX-1360P/D4 already brought out the performance benefits of Raptor Lake-P over the previous generation -P series offerings. We also took a second deep dive into Raptor Lake-P in our review of the Arena Canyon NUC. Both systems used DDR4-3200 SODIMMs. Does DDR5 make a difference in Raptor Lake-P performance over DDR4? This review provides a comprehensive look at the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 and attempts to answer that question at different power limits for the processor.

Introduction and Product Impressions

Intel's Raptor Lake-P is an evolved version of Alder Lake-P in a more efficient manufacturing process. It retains the heterogeneous computing architecture with a mixture of performance and efficiency cores. Desktop Raptor Lake is equipped with improved cache sizes for the performance cores and more number of efficiency cores compared to desktop Alder Lake. However, the improvements in the -P series come entirely from the updated V-F curves. The turbo clocks are higher, allowing for better performance and power efficiency within the same nominal TDP of Alder Lake-P. Raptor Lake-P also includes additional Thunderbolt 4 ports and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 support, subject to the adoption of specific board components.

ASRock is a well-known vendor in the consumer motherboard and mini-PC market. In 2011, the company set up the ASRock Industrial business unit to focus on industrial motherboards. The division branched out in 2018 as an independent vendor with exclusive focus on B2B products. The company has products for deployment in small businesses (offices), automation, robotics, security, and other industrial / IoT applications. As a company with a B2B focus primarily, the focus is on the development and sales of motherboards to various system integrators who can do their own value additions. The company also sells mini-PCs based on the developed motherboards into the retail channel. We have taken a close look at the performance profile of various ASRock Industrial UCFF PCs before, including that of the NUC BOX-1260P based on the Core i7-1260P Alder Lake-P processor and the NUCS BOX-1360P/D4 based on the Core i7-1360P Raptor Lake-P processor.

The company provided us with a barebones sample of the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 a few months back. It is their first Intel-based UCFF PC with DDR5 support. Unlike the NUCS BOX-1360P/D4 slim version without 2.5" drive support, the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 falls back to the I/O and chassis design seen in the NUC BOX-1200 series. Users get a 2.5" SATA drive bay, dual LAN capabilities, and both HDMI and DisplayPort display output options. The key differences compared to the NUCS BOX-1360P/D4 are summarized below.

  • Replacement of DDR4-3200 SODIMM slots with DDR5-4800 SODIMM slots
  • Additional 2.5 GbE RJ-45 port
  • Replacement of a HDMI 2.0a port with a full-sized DisplayPort 1.4a port
  • USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) support on both Type-C ports
  • Hayden Bridge retimer for the Thunderbolt 4 port (compared to Burnside Bridge in the NUCS BOX-1360P/D4)

ASRock Industrial delivers the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 in a non-descript box (with no inkling of the model inside the package). In addition to the main unit, the company includes a VESA mount with screws, M.2 mounting screws, a quick guide for assembling the system, and a 120W (19V @ 6.32A) adapter with a geo-specific power cord within that.

ASRock Industrial markets their mini-PCs in a barebones configuration, with the choice of RAM and SSD left to the end user. Installing these components involves removing four screws from the underside of the unit and slotting in the SODIMMs and affixing the M.2 SSD with a screw. Like the previous members in the NUC BOX series, the screw slot for the M.2 2280 SSD is on a separate plastic tab. The side of the chassis are perforated for air intake and the rear has the air vent that allows the laptop-style blower fan to exhaust air after passing it through the heat spreader. Pictures of the chassis as well as the board are available in the gallery below.

The barebones version of the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 needs DDR5-4800 SODIMMs and a M.2 SSD or 2.5" SATA drive to complete the build. We opted to install 2x 16GB of G.Skill's RipJaws DDR5-4800 SODIMMs along with a 500 GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO M.2 2280 NVMe SSD.

Windows 11 Enterprise 21H2 along with the latest updates was installed prior to proceeding with the performance evaluation. Similar to other UCFF PCs from ASRock Industrial, the NUC BOX-1360P also allows the CPU operation mode to be set to either 'Normal' (default) or 'Performance'. The fan is set to full speed at all times in the latter setting, but has the advantage of a higher PL1 limit (40W vs. 28W) for the processor. The full specifications of the review sample in both modes are provided in the table below.

Systems Specifications
(as tested)
  ASRock NUC BOX-1360P-D5 (Performance) ASRock NUC BOX-1360P-D5 (Normal)
Processor Intel Core i7-1360P
Raptor Lake 4P + 8E / 16T, up to 5.0 GHz (P) up to 3.7 GHz (E)
Intel 7, 18MB L2, Min / Max / Base TDP: 20W / 64W / 28W
PL1 = 40W, PL2 = 64W
Intel Core i7-1360P
Raptor Lake 4P + 8E / 16T, up to 5.0 GHz (P) up to 3.7 GHz (E)
Intel 7, 18MB L2, Min / Max / Base TDP: 20W / 64W / 28W
PL1 = 28W, PL2 = 64W
Memory G.Skill RipJaws F5-4800S3434A16GA2-RS DDR5-4800 SODIMM
34-34-34-76 @ 4800 MHz
2x16 GB
G.Skill RipJaws F5-4800S3434A16GA2-RS DDR5-4800 SODIMM
34-34-34-76 @ 4800 MHz
2x16 GB
Graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics
(96EU @ 1.50 GHz)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
(96EU @ 1.50 GHz)
Disk Drive(s) Samsung SSD 980 PRO
(500 GB; M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe;)
(Samsung 128L V-NAND 3D TLC; Samsung Elpis Controller)
Samsung SSD 980 PRO
(500 GB; M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe;)
(Samsung 128L V-NAND 3D TLC; Samsung Elpis Controller)
Networking 1x 2.5 GbE RJ-45 (Intel I226-LM)
1x 2.5 GbE RJ-45 (Intel I226-V)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (2x2 802.11ax - 2.4 Gbps)
1x 2.5 GbE RJ-45 (Intel I226-LM)
1x 2.5 GbE RJ-45 (Intel I226-V)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (2x2 802.11ax - 2.4 Gbps)
Audio Realtek ALC256 (3.5mm Audio Jack in Front)
Digital Audio with Bitstreaming Support over HDMI and Display Port
Realtek ALC256 (3.5mm Audio Jack in Front)
Digital Audio with Bitstreaming Support over HDMI and Display Port
Video 1x HDMI 2.0b (Rear)
1x DisplayPort 1.4a (Rear)
1x DisplayPort 2.1 (Front / USB4)
1x Display Port 1.4a over Type-C Alt-Mode
1x HDMI 2.0b (Rear)
1x DisplayPort 1.4a (Rear)
1x DisplayPort 2.1 (Front / USB4)
1x Display Port 1.4a over Type-C Alt-Mode
Miscellaneous I/O Ports 1x USB4 / Thunderbolt 4 Type-C (Front, up to 40 Gbps)
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C (Front, with DP Alt Mode)
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (Front)
2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (Rear)
1x USB4 / Thunderbolt 4 Type-C (Front, up to 40 Gbps)
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C (Front, with DP Alt Mode)
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (Front)
2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (Rear)
Operating System Windows 11 Enterprise (22000.2124) Windows 11 Enterprise (22000.2124)
Pricing US $670 (barebones)
US $810 (as configured, no OS)
US $670 (barebones)
US $810 (as configured, no OS)
Full Specifications ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1360P/D5 Specifications ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1360P/D5 Specifications

The next section takes a look at the various BIOS options and follows it up with a detailed platform analysis.

Setup Notes and Platform Analysis
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • ganeshts - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    Any links to such a 'NUC' ?

    I do have a Phoenix-based GTR7 from Beelink here in my testbed, but driver issues are preventing it from completing our benchmark suite. I am waiting for a new driver release from AMD.
  • lemurbutton - Friday, July 21, 2023 - link

    And any M2 Mac Mini would destroy any Zen4 NUC.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, July 24, 2023 - link

    Until you have to run something not in the MAC ecosystem. OOPS!
  • PeachNCream - Friday, July 21, 2023 - link

    I don't think destruction is quite the right to articulate your apparent thoughts. Perhaps "result in higher scores on benchmarks" or maybe "complete compute workloads sooner" would fit better in this case. Computer nerds appear to be rather detached from reality when expressing thoughts which gives all of them a bad reputation among the better positioned and more intelligent normal population.
  • Samus - Saturday, July 22, 2023 - link

    The problem with AMD enterprise and industrial products has always been management adoption. Intel has IT depts hooked on vPro, iME, AMT, etc.
  • nicolaim - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    It's 2023. Only two USB-C ports, none on the back.
  • Samus - Thursday, July 20, 2023 - link

    That was my gripe. Replace the HDMI and DP ports with two TB4-compliant USB-C ports on the rear would be the minimum modification for such an 'industrial' appliance. Seriously, why do you have to plug something into the front to use Thunderbolt?
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, July 20, 2023 - link

    Probably because nobody uses or cares about Thunderbolt. Sure it has that usual small, insane rabid fanbase that any obscure computer standard had in the past, but outside of the inevitable idiots that inflate its utility, no one cares and no one profits from it.
  • abufrejoval - Monday, July 24, 2023 - link

    That's a bit harsh.

    Yes, using TB to its full potential is somewhat expensive but given a choice, I'll always opt for the TB variant over pure USB, if only for 10Gbit Ethernet.

    Front vs. back: I guess they have done their studies on how people use TB and unfortunately habits vary between people.

    Most of my dual TB systems have one TB in the front, the other in the back and that works pretty well for me. The 10GBase-T NIC goes into the back port and the front port is open to anything transient, which could be just some USB media (these native SATA 10Gbit USB sticks are hard to beat via anything native TB), a temporary display (Alt-DP handy there) and in theory to things like TB networking, which is typically transient.

    The older systems just have a single TB and expect a hub connected on the back, which seems sensible.

    Two in the front and two in the back would be better still, even if you couldn't use all four at full speed for lack of PCIe lanes or a cheap enough switch.

    Yet again, when your NUC is stuck to the back of a display, who cares what's front or back, because it's all behind the screen anyway and it's only people like me, wo use clusters of these NUCs as µ-servers in a "tiny-rack" who get bothered by the orientation of those ports.

    Changing port orientation in a NUC means a mainboard redesign and few would want to pay for that. So I guess their asked their volume customers and this is what those came up with.

    Very few vendors want to aggravate the customers.
  • sjkpublic@gmail.com - Thursday, July 20, 2023 - link

    Performance comparison says it all. 1360P DOA. 7735U $100-200 cheaper for ASROCK. Even cheaper if you look at other companies.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now