Basic Features: Asus A8R-MVP

 Asus A8R-MVP
CPU Interface Socket 939 Athlon 64
Chipset ATI RD480 Northbridge - ULi M1575 Southbridge
Bus Speeds 200 to 400MHz in 1MHz Increments
Memory Speeds DDR200, 266, 333, 400
(433, 466, 500 with Rev. E AMD)
PCIe Speeds 100 to 150MHz in 1MHz Increments
PCI/AGP Fixed at 33/66
Core Voltage Auto, 0.8V to 1.45V in 0.025V increments
PLUS 0.2V with vCore Over-voltage
(Maximum vCore 1.65V)
CPU Clock Multiplier 4X-25.5X in 0.5X increments
DRAM Voltage Auto, 2.65V to 3.2V in .05V to .1V increments
HyperTransport Frequency 1000MHz (1GHz)
HyperTransport Multiplier Auto, 1X to 5X
PCI Express Voltage 1.2V, 1.3V, 1.4V, 1.5V
Southbridge Overvoltage Enabled (+0.1v)
PEG Link Mode Auto, Disabled, Normal, Fast, Faster
PEG Bugger Length Auto, Short, Long, Longer, Longest
AI Overclocking Manual, Auto*, Standard*, Overclock Profile
*Set CPU Frequency and Other Parameters Automatically
Overclock Profile Options 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%
Memory Slots Four 184-pin DDR DIMM Slots
Dual-Channel Configuration
Regular Unbuffered or ECC Memory to 4GB Total
Expansion Slots 2 PCIe x16
1 PCIe x1
3 PCI Slots
1 Asus MVP Switch Card in Secondary (Black) PCIe Slot
Onboard SATA/RAID 4 SATA2 Drives by ULi M1575
(RAID 0, 1, 1+0, 5, JBOD)
Onboard IDE/IDE RAID Two Standard ATA133/100/66 (4 drives)
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports supported by ULi M1575
2 1394 Firewire by TI 1394
Onboard LAN 1 Gigabit Ethernet
PCI Ethernet by Marvel Yukon 88E8001
Onboard Audio Azalia HD Audio by ADI AD1986A Soundmax codec
BIOS Revision AMI 0037 (11/17/05) Beta

While the BIOS adjustments are not as extensive as the Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe or the DFI RDX200, most of the adjustments needed for overclocking control are definitely here.

This includes memory voltage to 3.2V – much wider than most boards and the equal of the Asus A8N32-SLI. Memory voltage does not extend to 4.0V as it does on the DFI, but the only memory requiring these high voltages is OCZ VX and Mushkin Redline, both of which have been discontinued.

After our initial testing showed the A8R-MVP to be an excellent overclocker, we suggested to Asus that they support the higher memory ratios of the Revision E and above AMD Memory Controller and include additional adjustments for memory. Asus added the ratios and a few more memory controls, which will be available on-line as the board begins shipping this week.

The arrangement of options in AMI BIOS has not always been the most intuitive. You will find memory adjustments under “Advanced”, “CPU Configuration”, “Memory Configuration”, and “Memory Timing Configuration”. The logic of this menu nesting is obscure, but once you drill down to memory timing adjustments, you will find a fairly complete range of options. In most cases, you will need to change from “Auto” to “Manual” to bring up the adjustments.

Asus A8R-MVP: Board Layout Overclocking & Memory Stress Testing: Asus A8R-MVP
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • AllanLim - Sunday, December 11, 2005 - link

    What I should have said is that the BIOS memory option maxes out at 200, so why is there a need to raise memory timings to 3-4-3-8 when at 325x9.


  • Wesley Fink - Sunday, December 11, 2005 - link

    200 is the starting point (400DDR) in BIOS, and memory clock floats with the CPU frequency. Thus at 325 Clock Speed the memory set at 200 is running DDR650. Memory floats with clock frequency on almost every board we test.

    If you start memory at 166 (333), it would run at about 270 (DDR540) with the Clock Frequency set to 325. You may want to do some reading or ask some questions in our Forums to better understand how this works.
  • AllanLim - Sunday, December 11, 2005 - link

    Got it, checked out Zebo's article in forums, my bad for not checking this out earlier. Thus begins my foray into AMD64 overclocking.

    Many thnx for help.
  • EnlightenedOne - Monday, December 12, 2005 - link

    K great. Thanks for the quick reply wes :D

    Final question I promise, lol.

    At the 325 x 9 setting, how stable do you think the CPU would be @ load? For example, I'm going to be playing alot of BF2 and Quake 4 with this new set up. I was wondering if it will be atleast 6 hours stable in those games at load.

    What do you think?
  • EnlightenedOne - Monday, December 12, 2005 - link

    I'm also trying to see if I can tighten those dram timings a bit by adding more voltage. What are the tighest/stable that you got with a higher ram voltage?
  • EnlightenedOne - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - link

    Hey Wesley, Great Review!

    I was wondering a few things with this motherboard and the setup.
    First, do you think the clawhammer 4000+ would overclock better than the Diego?
    What voltage are you feeding your ram to reach such a high frequency?
    Do you suggest using the 246 x 12 or the 325 x 9 set up for games?
    Finally, what voltage are you feeding the PCIe slot? Also, why haven't you upped the voltage to your cpu core to maintain stability and go beyond 2 days? :)
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, December 9, 2005 - link

    Our San Diego clocks almost exactly the same as the Clawhammer 4000+, but it runs cooler. I would choose San Diego. We tested both on this board, as we have done for the last few reviews, found performance very similar (we had a fantastic Clawhammer that may not have been typical), and moved to the 90nm CPU for future reviews.

    The OCZ TCCD RAM was only getting 2.75V-2.8V. My pairs really don't like or need more voltage to reach high overclocks.

    Which you use depends on your RAM. In most cases you can get tighter timings at 246 than at 325. The best speed is a balance of highest RAM clock consistent with tightest timings. There is no cut-and-dried answer to your question.

    I did not overclock PCIe, but the chipset and/or PCIe sometimes reauires a small voltage boost at extreme overclocks.

    If you check the OC page I am using 1.45V vCore which is a modest OC of .05V from the default 1.4V. It didn't reboot after 2 days, we had to move on to other reviews. It might still be running fine at 325x9 for all we know.
  • EnlightenedOne - Sunday, December 11, 2005 - link

    Awesome. 1 Quick last simple question. Did you slowly up the FSB through the bios and reboot, then up it again? Or did you use a windows based overclocker program that asus provided? If using the reboot method.. how long did you let it run before rebooting and upping the fsb a little more. If windows method, how long did you wait before upping the FSB little by little? Thanks :D
  • Wesley Fink - Sunday, December 11, 2005 - link

    I rebooted and upped the frequency a bit, went into windows, then rebooted and upped frequency again.
  • abakshi - Wednesday, December 7, 2005 - link

    Hmm...this is looking pretty good. But GigE performance is pretty important for me -- if I get a separate PCI-E 1x GigE card, can I match the throughput of the integrated PCI-E chipsets, like the Marvel, etc.?

    Any recommendations for a card? From a quick look around, I've seen an expensive D-Link ($80), some assorted others (SysKonnect, etc.) at varying ranges. Any benches of these for reference?

    And if I put in two X1800XT's, I wouldn't be able to fit a 1x card in between, right? What about with single-slot cards like the X1800XL?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now