ATI Radeon X850 XT

Compared to the Radeon X850 XT Platinum Edition:

The $50 for the Platinum Edition looks like it'll give you between a 1 and 5% performance boost at 1600 x 1200 over the not-so-platinum Radeon X850 XT, not a huge improvement.

Compared to the Radeon X800 XT:

Compared to the X800 XT, the X850 XT is about 0 - 5% faster, which isn't bad considering it's at the same price point as the now "old" X800 XT. While it is unlikely, if the introduction of the X850 XT drives X800 XT prices down further then we're all for picking up a X800 XT instead. The problem is that the X800 XT was quite rare to begin with, so it's more likely that stock of the X800 XT will just dry up and will be replaced by the X850 XT.

Compared to NVIDIA's GeForce 6800 Ultra:

Things don't look as balanced when you compare the X850 XT to the 6800 Ultra. Once again we see that Half Life 2 and Battlefield go to ATI, while Doom 3 continues to be a staunch NVIDIA supporter.

ATI's Radeon X850 XT Platinum Edition ATI Radeon X850 Pro
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • IdahoB - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    I just hope that the large increase in the variety of cards means that a couple of them which actually be available to buy. It seems that they have more model numbers than physical stock these days. I would have loved a X800 of some description but couldn't find one anywhere in the UK so settled for the still slightly unreliable 6800GT.
  • Araemo - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    #7: At least it's less confusing than intel's new numbering system. yeesh.
  • StrangerGuy - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    X800SE,
    X800,
    X800 Pro,
    X800 XL,
    X800 XT,
    X800 XT PE,
    X850 Pro,
    X850 XT
    and X850 XT PE

    9 models of high-end ATI cards? Oh man that is really confusing even for enthusiasts and geeks...
  • Araemo - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    #4 The 'video processing unit' isn't for playback, it's for encode, and as far as I'm aware, ATI's non-AIW cards don't have hardware encode either.
  • Araemo - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    I guess my 9700 Pro is safe for another 8-12 months...


    hopefully.
  • LoneWolf15 - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    No-one is mentioning the one thing ATI almost certainly has in its favor: video playback. The GeForce 68xx's "video processing unit" still does not have drivers that take advantage of it, whyever the case may be. ATI has always had a strong tradition of video playback performance. I'd really like to see Anandtech bench CPU usage with these cards with 1080 HD .WMV files, as well as with MPEG-2/MPEG-4. This would be truly useful for enthusiasts and help round out our buying decisions.
  • gibhunter - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    Ati is looking desperate with this release. Their fastest part is what, 3% faster then their previous champ. On top of that, you still can't find these fastest cards. If they were trying to confuse the customer, they might as well consider it mission accomplished.

    Personally, I'd just stick with 6800GT and have an upgrade path with an SLI Nforce4 board and another 6800GT in the future.
  • segagenesis - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    The X850 Pro is somewhat disappointing vs. its competition, does nVidia even have refresh parts planned for winter? I was looking at the $400 price range myself :(
  • Cat - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    If it means more cards are available for less cost, than I'm all for this. It's still kinda disappointing, though.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now